混合式人际心理治疗治疗重度抑郁症的初步研究。

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210061
Digna J F van Schaik, Amrah Y Schotanus, Els Dozeman, Marcus J H Huibers, Pim Cuijpers, Tara Donker
{"title":"混合式人际心理治疗治疗重度抑郁症的初步研究。","authors":"Digna J F van Schaik,&nbsp;Amrah Y Schotanus,&nbsp;Els Dozeman,&nbsp;Marcus J H Huibers,&nbsp;Pim Cuijpers,&nbsp;Tara Donker","doi":"10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Blended-format interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is an integrated approach consisting of alternating face-to-face (in person or videoconferencing) and online sessions, and this format may increase access to care, empower patients, and improve quality and cost-effectiveness of care. This study, conducted in the Netherlands, was one of the first to investigate the feasibility of blended-format IPT in specialized mental health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (ages 18-64, N=21) with a unipolar depressive episode were recruited at an outpatient mood disorder clinic. In this pre-post nonrandomized pilot study, the blended IPT consisted of six online sessions alternated with six to 10 in-person or videoconferencing sessions. Feasibility (defined as >60% of the participants having completed >50% of the online sessions), usability (via the System Usability Scale [SUS]), satisfaction (via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 [CSQ-8] and qualitative interviewing), and symptom reduction (via the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 90% (95% CI=70%-99%) completed all online sessions. Mean±SD scores were 25.12±3.55 (of 32) on the CSQ-8 and 66.0±12.4 (of 100) on the SUS. PHQ-9 scores (N=21) decreased significantly, from 17.48±5.41 at baseline to 11.90±6.45 postintervention, indicating improvement (t=4.86, df=20, p=0.001). Hedges' g was 0.90 (95% CI=0.44-1.41), indicating a large effect size. The treatment response rate was 33% (95% CI=15%-57%); the remission rate was 19% (95% CI=6%-42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blended-format IPT was feasible, and patients were satisfied with the intervention. The therapy described here may serve as a starting point for cost-effectiveness research on this promising format.</p>","PeriodicalId":46822,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":"76 2","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Study of Blended-Format Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Digna J F van Schaik,&nbsp;Amrah Y Schotanus,&nbsp;Els Dozeman,&nbsp;Marcus J H Huibers,&nbsp;Pim Cuijpers,&nbsp;Tara Donker\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Blended-format interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is an integrated approach consisting of alternating face-to-face (in person or videoconferencing) and online sessions, and this format may increase access to care, empower patients, and improve quality and cost-effectiveness of care. This study, conducted in the Netherlands, was one of the first to investigate the feasibility of blended-format IPT in specialized mental health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (ages 18-64, N=21) with a unipolar depressive episode were recruited at an outpatient mood disorder clinic. In this pre-post nonrandomized pilot study, the blended IPT consisted of six online sessions alternated with six to 10 in-person or videoconferencing sessions. Feasibility (defined as >60% of the participants having completed >50% of the online sessions), usability (via the System Usability Scale [SUS]), satisfaction (via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 [CSQ-8] and qualitative interviewing), and symptom reduction (via the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 90% (95% CI=70%-99%) completed all online sessions. Mean±SD scores were 25.12±3.55 (of 32) on the CSQ-8 and 66.0±12.4 (of 100) on the SUS. PHQ-9 scores (N=21) decreased significantly, from 17.48±5.41 at baseline to 11.90±6.45 postintervention, indicating improvement (t=4.86, df=20, p=0.001). Hedges' g was 0.90 (95% CI=0.44-1.41), indicating a large effect size. The treatment response rate was 33% (95% CI=15%-57%); the remission rate was 19% (95% CI=6%-42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blended-format IPT was feasible, and patients were satisfied with the intervention. The therapy described here may serve as a starting point for cost-effectiveness research on this promising format.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY\",\"volume\":\"76 2\",\"pages\":\"69-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20210061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:混合格式人际心理治疗(IPT)是一种由面对面(亲自或视频会议)和在线会议交替组成的综合方法,这种格式可以增加获得护理的机会,赋予患者权力,并提高护理的质量和成本效益。这项研究是在荷兰进行的,是第一个调查混合形式IPT在专业精神卫生保健中的可行性的研究之一。方法:在一家情绪障碍门诊招募有单相抑郁发作的参与者(年龄18-64岁,N=21)。在这个前后非随机的试点研究中,混合IPT包括6个在线课程和6到10个面对面或视频会议课程。评估了可行性(定义为>60%的参与者完成了>50%的在线会话)、可用性(通过系统可用性量表[SUS])、满意度(通过客户满意度问卷-8 [CSQ-8]和定性访谈)和症状减轻(通过9项患者健康问卷[PHQ-9])。结果:在参与者中,90% (95% CI=70%-99%)完成了所有在线课程。CSQ-8的平均±SD评分为25.12±3.55(32分),SUS的平均±SD评分为66.0±12.4(100分)。PHQ-9评分(N=21)显著下降,由基线时的17.48±5.41分降至干预后的11.90±6.45分(t=4.86, df=20, p=0.001)。Hedges' g为0.90 (95% CI=0.44-1.41),表明效应量很大。治疗有效率为33% (95% CI=15%-57%);缓解率为19% (95% CI=6% ~ 42%)。结论:混合形式的IPT是可行的,患者对干预满意。这里描述的疗法可以作为对这种有前途的形式进行成本效益研究的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pilot Study of Blended-Format Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder.

Objective: Blended-format interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is an integrated approach consisting of alternating face-to-face (in person or videoconferencing) and online sessions, and this format may increase access to care, empower patients, and improve quality and cost-effectiveness of care. This study, conducted in the Netherlands, was one of the first to investigate the feasibility of blended-format IPT in specialized mental health care.

Methods: Participants (ages 18-64, N=21) with a unipolar depressive episode were recruited at an outpatient mood disorder clinic. In this pre-post nonrandomized pilot study, the blended IPT consisted of six online sessions alternated with six to 10 in-person or videoconferencing sessions. Feasibility (defined as >60% of the participants having completed >50% of the online sessions), usability (via the System Usability Scale [SUS]), satisfaction (via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 [CSQ-8] and qualitative interviewing), and symptom reduction (via the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]) were assessed.

Results: Of the participants, 90% (95% CI=70%-99%) completed all online sessions. Mean±SD scores were 25.12±3.55 (of 32) on the CSQ-8 and 66.0±12.4 (of 100) on the SUS. PHQ-9 scores (N=21) decreased significantly, from 17.48±5.41 at baseline to 11.90±6.45 postintervention, indicating improvement (t=4.86, df=20, p=0.001). Hedges' g was 0.90 (95% CI=0.44-1.41), indicating a large effect size. The treatment response rate was 33% (95% CI=15%-57%); the remission rate was 19% (95% CI=6%-42%).

Conclusions: Blended-format IPT was feasible, and patients were satisfied with the intervention. The therapy described here may serve as a starting point for cost-effectiveness research on this promising format.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Founded in 1939, the American Journal of Psychotherapy (AJP) has long been a leader in the publication of eclectic articles for all psychotherapists. Transtheoretic in reach (offering information for psychotherapists across all theoretical foundations), the goal of AJP is to present an overview of the psychotherapies, subsuming a host of schools, techniques, and psychological modalities within the larger domain of clinical practice under broad themes including dynamic, behavioral, spiritual, and experiential.
期刊最新文献
Guarding the Guidelines: Objectivity in Treatment Recommendations. Trauma-Focused ACT: A Practitioner's Guide to Working With Mind, Body, and Emotion Using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents: Examining Preliminary Pretreatment Expectations and Preferences. Implementing a Problem-Oriented Integrative Therapy: Flexible Care for Patients Experiencing Complex Psychiatric Conditions. Problem-Oriented Integrative Therapy: Maximizing Clinical Flexibility in Treating Complex Psychiatric Conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1