器械辅助软组织技术与主动软组织治疗对上斜方肌潜在触发点的影响:随机临床研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1002/pri.1859
{"title":"器械辅助软组织技术与主动软组织治疗对上斜方肌潜在触发点的影响:随机临床研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/pri.1859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo compare the effects of active soft tissue therapies versus Graston technique in chronic neck pain patients with latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle.\n\n\nMETHODS\nDesign of the study was randomized clinical study. Forty-five female chronic neck pain patients with latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle were randomly assigned into equal groups of 15 subjects. Group (A) received stretching exercise and active soft tissue therapy, group (B) received stretching exercise and Graston technique and group (C) received stretching exercise only. Pain pressure threshold and cervical ranges of motions were obtained before and after treatment in each group.\n\n\nRESULTS\nMixed MANOVA revealed that there was a significant interaction of treatment and time (F [14, 72] = 8.97, p = .001). There was a significant main effect of time (F [7, 36] = 699.15 p = .001). There was a significant main effect of treatment (F [14, 72] = 5.34, p = .001). Within-group comparison revealed a significant increase in PPT and cervical ROM in the three groups post treatment compared with that pretreatment (p < .001). Between groups comparisons pretreatment revealed a no significant difference in all parameters (p > .05). Comparison between groups post treatment revealed a significant increase in PPT and cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation toward affected and non-affected side of group A and B compared with that of group C (p < .01). While there was no significant difference in in PPT and all cervical ROM between group A and B post treatment (p > .05).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe current study does not support the efficacy of IASTM in increasing pain pressure threshold and range of motion in chronic neck pain patients with latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle when compared with other treatments.","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"28 2","pages":"e1859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1859","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Withdrawn: Influence of instrument assisted soft tissue techniques versus active soft tissue therapies on latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle: Randomized clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.1859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nTo compare the effects of active soft tissue therapies versus Graston technique in chronic neck pain patients with latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nDesign of the study was randomized clinical study. Forty-five female chronic neck pain patients with latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle were randomly assigned into equal groups of 15 subjects. Group (A) received stretching exercise and active soft tissue therapy, group (B) received stretching exercise and Graston technique and group (C) received stretching exercise only. Pain pressure threshold and cervical ranges of motions were obtained before and after treatment in each group.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nMixed MANOVA revealed that there was a significant interaction of treatment and time (F [14, 72] = 8.97, p = .001). There was a significant main effect of time (F [7, 36] = 699.15 p = .001). There was a significant main effect of treatment (F [14, 72] = 5.34, p = .001). Within-group comparison revealed a significant increase in PPT and cervical ROM in the three groups post treatment compared with that pretreatment (p < .001). Between groups comparisons pretreatment revealed a no significant difference in all parameters (p > .05). Comparison between groups post treatment revealed a significant increase in PPT and cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation toward affected and non-affected side of group A and B compared with that of group C (p < .01). While there was no significant difference in in PPT and all cervical ROM between group A and B post treatment (p > .05).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe current study does not support the efficacy of IASTM in increasing pain pressure threshold and range of motion in chronic neck pain patients with latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle when compared with other treatments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"e1859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pri.1859\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Withdrawn: Influence of instrument assisted soft tissue techniques versus active soft tissue therapies on latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle: Randomized clinical study.
OBJECTIVES To compare the effects of active soft tissue therapies versus Graston technique in chronic neck pain patients with latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. METHODS Design of the study was randomized clinical study. Forty-five female chronic neck pain patients with latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle were randomly assigned into equal groups of 15 subjects. Group (A) received stretching exercise and active soft tissue therapy, group (B) received stretching exercise and Graston technique and group (C) received stretching exercise only. Pain pressure threshold and cervical ranges of motions were obtained before and after treatment in each group. RESULTS Mixed MANOVA revealed that there was a significant interaction of treatment and time (F [14, 72] = 8.97, p = .001). There was a significant main effect of time (F [7, 36] = 699.15 p = .001). There was a significant main effect of treatment (F [14, 72] = 5.34, p = .001). Within-group comparison revealed a significant increase in PPT and cervical ROM in the three groups post treatment compared with that pretreatment (p < .001). Between groups comparisons pretreatment revealed a no significant difference in all parameters (p > .05). Comparison between groups post treatment revealed a significant increase in PPT and cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation toward affected and non-affected side of group A and B compared with that of group C (p < .01). While there was no significant difference in in PPT and all cervical ROM between group A and B post treatment (p > .05). CONCLUSION The current study does not support the efficacy of IASTM in increasing pain pressure threshold and range of motion in chronic neck pain patients with latent trigger point of upper trapezius muscle when compared with other treatments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Efficacy of Action Observation Therapy on Gait, Balance and Mobility Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Individuals Post Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1