吸气肌训练对COVID-19感染后持续性呼吸困难患者的可行性:一项初步研究

Romain Collet, Maarten VAN Egmond, Marike VAN DER Schaaf, Mel Major
{"title":"吸气肌训练对COVID-19感染后持续性呼吸困难患者的可行性:一项初步研究","authors":"Romain Collet,&nbsp;Maarten VAN Egmond,&nbsp;Marike VAN DER Schaaf,&nbsp;Mel Major","doi":"10.2340/jrmcc.v6.6507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the feasibility of delivering inspiratory muscle training as part of the physical therapy treatment for patients with post-COVID dyspnoea.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-methods pilot study.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Patients with complaints of dyspnoea after COVID-19 infection and their physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences and the Amsterdam University Medical Centers conducted this study. Participants performed daily inspiratory muscle training at home for 6 weeks, consisting of 30 repetitions against a pre-set resistance. The primary outcome was feasibility assessed as acceptability, safety, adherence and patient- and professional experience obtained through diaries and semi-structured interviews. The secondary outcome was maximal inspiratory pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients participated. Nine patients and 2 physical therapists partook in semi-structured interviews. Two patients dropped out before initiating the training. Adherence was 73.7%, and no adverse events occurred. Protocol deviations occurred in 29.7% of the sessions. Maximal inspiratory pressure changed from 84.7% of predicted at baseline to 111.3% at follow-up. Qualitative analysis identified barriers to training: 'Getting acquainted with the training material' and 'Finding the right schedule'. Facilitators were: 'Support from physical therapists' and 'Experiencing improvements'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delivering inspiratory muscle training to patients with post-COVID dyspnoea seems feasible. Patients valued the simplicity of the intervention and reported perceived improvements. However, the intervention should be carefully supervised, and training parameters adjusted to individual needs and capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/16/71/JRMCC-6-6507.PMC10262391.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FEASIBILITY OF INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING FOR PATIENTS WITH PERSISTENT DYSPNOEA AFTER COVID-19 INFECTION: A PILOT STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"Romain Collet,&nbsp;Maarten VAN Egmond,&nbsp;Marike VAN DER Schaaf,&nbsp;Mel Major\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/jrmcc.v6.6507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the feasibility of delivering inspiratory muscle training as part of the physical therapy treatment for patients with post-COVID dyspnoea.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-methods pilot study.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Patients with complaints of dyspnoea after COVID-19 infection and their physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences and the Amsterdam University Medical Centers conducted this study. Participants performed daily inspiratory muscle training at home for 6 weeks, consisting of 30 repetitions against a pre-set resistance. The primary outcome was feasibility assessed as acceptability, safety, adherence and patient- and professional experience obtained through diaries and semi-structured interviews. The secondary outcome was maximal inspiratory pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients participated. Nine patients and 2 physical therapists partook in semi-structured interviews. Two patients dropped out before initiating the training. Adherence was 73.7%, and no adverse events occurred. Protocol deviations occurred in 29.7% of the sessions. Maximal inspiratory pressure changed from 84.7% of predicted at baseline to 111.3% at follow-up. Qualitative analysis identified barriers to training: 'Getting acquainted with the training material' and 'Finding the right schedule'. Facilitators were: 'Support from physical therapists' and 'Experiencing improvements'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delivering inspiratory muscle training to patients with post-COVID dyspnoea seems feasible. Patients valued the simplicity of the intervention and reported perceived improvements. However, the intervention should be carefully supervised, and training parameters adjusted to individual needs and capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/16/71/JRMCC-6-6507.PMC10262391.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v6.6507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v6.6507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨将吸气肌训练作为新冠肺炎后呼吸困难患者物理治疗的一部分的可行性。设计:混合方法试点研究。研究对象/患者:COVID-19感染后出现呼吸困难的患者及其物理治疗师。方法:阿姆斯特丹应用科学大学和阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心进行了这项研究。参与者每天在家进行吸气肌训练,为期6周,包括30次重复,对抗预先设定的阻力。主要结局是可行性评估,包括可接受性、安全性、依从性以及通过日记和半结构化访谈获得的患者和专业经验。次要终点为最大吸气压。结果:16例患者参与。9名患者和2名物理治疗师参加了半结构化访谈。两名患者在训练开始前就退出了。依从性为73.7%,无不良事件发生。29.7%的会话出现了协议偏差。最大吸气压力从基线预测的84.7%变为随访时的111.3%。定性分析确定了培训的障碍:“熟悉培训材料”和“找到合适的时间表”。辅助因素是:“来自物理治疗师的支持”和“体验改善”。结论:对新冠肺炎后呼吸困难患者进行吸气肌训练是可行的。患者重视干预的简单性,并报告了感知到的改善。然而,干预应仔细监督,并根据个人需要和能力调整培训参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FEASIBILITY OF INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING FOR PATIENTS WITH PERSISTENT DYSPNOEA AFTER COVID-19 INFECTION: A PILOT STUDY.

Objective: This study investigates the feasibility of delivering inspiratory muscle training as part of the physical therapy treatment for patients with post-COVID dyspnoea.

Design: Mixed-methods pilot study.

Subjects/patients: Patients with complaints of dyspnoea after COVID-19 infection and their physical therapists.

Methods: The Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences and the Amsterdam University Medical Centers conducted this study. Participants performed daily inspiratory muscle training at home for 6 weeks, consisting of 30 repetitions against a pre-set resistance. The primary outcome was feasibility assessed as acceptability, safety, adherence and patient- and professional experience obtained through diaries and semi-structured interviews. The secondary outcome was maximal inspiratory pressure.

Results: Sixteen patients participated. Nine patients and 2 physical therapists partook in semi-structured interviews. Two patients dropped out before initiating the training. Adherence was 73.7%, and no adverse events occurred. Protocol deviations occurred in 29.7% of the sessions. Maximal inspiratory pressure changed from 84.7% of predicted at baseline to 111.3% at follow-up. Qualitative analysis identified barriers to training: 'Getting acquainted with the training material' and 'Finding the right schedule'. Facilitators were: 'Support from physical therapists' and 'Experiencing improvements'.

Conclusion: Delivering inspiratory muscle training to patients with post-COVID dyspnoea seems feasible. Patients valued the simplicity of the intervention and reported perceived improvements. However, the intervention should be carefully supervised, and training parameters adjusted to individual needs and capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EXPLORING THE FEASIBILITY OF PLATELET-RICH PLASMA INJECTIONS FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCOPATHY: A PILOT STUDY. FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH POST COVID-19 CONDITION AFTER A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ASSESSMENT: A PILOT STUDY. TIMELY MUNICIPALITY REHABILITATION AFTER HOSPITALISATION REDUCES READMISSION AND EARLY MORTALITY. LONG-TERM REPEATED BOTULINUM TOXIN A TREATMENT OVER 12 YEARS GRADUALLY CHANGES GAIT CHARACTERISTICS: SINGLE-CASE STUDY. INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN FOR NEUROFIBROMATOSIS RELATED SPINAL CORD INJURY WITH SPASTICITY - A CASE REPORT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1