手指受伤时自粘弹力绷带可能造成的先天性损伤。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS HAND Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1177/15589447231160208
Henry H Yu, Jason Nadeau, Jenna Powell, Charles Fox, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi
{"title":"手指受伤时自粘弹力绷带可能造成的先天性损伤。","authors":"Henry H Yu, Jason Nadeau, Jenna Powell, Charles Fox, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi","doi":"10.1177/15589447231160208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of a self-adherent, elastic bandage is a practical way to dress finger injuries. Multiple reports describe iatrogenic injuries from elastic bandages, ranging from skin necrosis to finger gangrene, necessitating amputations. This study investigated whether elastic bandages can compromise digital perfusion by occluding arterial blood flow in healthy volunteers and evaluated the utility of pulse oximetry as a monitoring tool for digital perfusion. A technique for safe bandage application is proposed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A commercially available elastic bandage was wrapped around the index finger of 20 healthy volunteers at varying degrees of stretch. Digital perfusion measurements were carried out using photoelectric pulse transduction, laser Doppler flowmetry, and pulse oximetry. Intracompartmental pressure measurements were recorded using a separate in vitro experimental model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elastic bandages applied at maximum stretch did not change digital brachial index or pulse oximetry values, suggesting arterial blood flow was preserved distal to the bandage. Intracompartmental pressure measurements at maximum stretch remained below the systolic digital pressure. In contrast, superficial dermal perfusion fell to 32% of normal as measured by laser Doppler flow, at 100% bandage stretch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests a risk for iatrogenic injury when using elastic bandages for finger dressings. While arterial inflow was never compromised, pressures were high enough to occlude superficial venous outflow, which may begin at 20% bandage stretch. Pulse oximetry failed to detect changes distal to applied dressings, and we do not recommend it to detect digital vascular compromise in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"1138-1145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Iatrogenic Injury Potential of Self-adherent, Elastic Bandages in Finger Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Henry H Yu, Jason Nadeau, Jenna Powell, Charles Fox, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447231160208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of a self-adherent, elastic bandage is a practical way to dress finger injuries. Multiple reports describe iatrogenic injuries from elastic bandages, ranging from skin necrosis to finger gangrene, necessitating amputations. This study investigated whether elastic bandages can compromise digital perfusion by occluding arterial blood flow in healthy volunteers and evaluated the utility of pulse oximetry as a monitoring tool for digital perfusion. A technique for safe bandage application is proposed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A commercially available elastic bandage was wrapped around the index finger of 20 healthy volunteers at varying degrees of stretch. Digital perfusion measurements were carried out using photoelectric pulse transduction, laser Doppler flowmetry, and pulse oximetry. Intracompartmental pressure measurements were recorded using a separate in vitro experimental model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elastic bandages applied at maximum stretch did not change digital brachial index or pulse oximetry values, suggesting arterial blood flow was preserved distal to the bandage. Intracompartmental pressure measurements at maximum stretch remained below the systolic digital pressure. In contrast, superficial dermal perfusion fell to 32% of normal as measured by laser Doppler flow, at 100% bandage stretch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests a risk for iatrogenic injury when using elastic bandages for finger dressings. While arterial inflow was never compromised, pressures were high enough to occlude superficial venous outflow, which may begin at 20% bandage stretch. Pulse oximetry failed to detect changes distal to applied dressings, and we do not recommend it to detect digital vascular compromise in this setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1138-1145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231160208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231160208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用自粘弹力绷带包扎手指损伤是一种实用的方法。多份报告描述了弹力绷带造成的先天性损伤,从皮肤坏死到手指坏疽,导致必须截肢。本研究调查了弹性绷带是否会通过阻断健康志愿者的动脉血流而影响数字血流灌注,并评估了脉搏血氧仪作为数字血流灌注监测工具的实用性。本文提出了一种安全使用绷带的技术:方法:在 20 名健康志愿者的食指上缠绕不同拉伸程度的市售弹力绷带。使用光电脉冲传导、激光多普勒血流测量仪和脉搏血氧仪进行数字灌注测量。使用单独的体外实验模型记录了瓣膜内压力测量结果:结果:在最大拉伸状态下使用弹性绷带不会改变数字肱动脉指数或脉搏氧饱和度值,表明绷带远端动脉血流保持不变。最大拉伸时的椎间隙内压测量值仍低于数字收缩压。相反,根据激光多普勒血流测量,在绷带拉伸100%时,真皮浅层的血流灌注下降到正常值的32%:这项研究表明,使用弹力绷带包扎手指存在先天性损伤的风险。虽然动脉血流从未受到影响,但压力高到足以堵塞浅静脉流出,这可能从绷带拉伸 20% 开始。脉搏血氧仪无法检测到敷料远端的变化,因此我们不建议在这种情况下使用脉搏血氧仪检测数字血管受损情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Iatrogenic Injury Potential of Self-adherent, Elastic Bandages in Finger Injuries.

Background: The use of a self-adherent, elastic bandage is a practical way to dress finger injuries. Multiple reports describe iatrogenic injuries from elastic bandages, ranging from skin necrosis to finger gangrene, necessitating amputations. This study investigated whether elastic bandages can compromise digital perfusion by occluding arterial blood flow in healthy volunteers and evaluated the utility of pulse oximetry as a monitoring tool for digital perfusion. A technique for safe bandage application is proposed.

Methods: A commercially available elastic bandage was wrapped around the index finger of 20 healthy volunteers at varying degrees of stretch. Digital perfusion measurements were carried out using photoelectric pulse transduction, laser Doppler flowmetry, and pulse oximetry. Intracompartmental pressure measurements were recorded using a separate in vitro experimental model.

Results: Elastic bandages applied at maximum stretch did not change digital brachial index or pulse oximetry values, suggesting arterial blood flow was preserved distal to the bandage. Intracompartmental pressure measurements at maximum stretch remained below the systolic digital pressure. In contrast, superficial dermal perfusion fell to 32% of normal as measured by laser Doppler flow, at 100% bandage stretch.

Conclusion: This study suggests a risk for iatrogenic injury when using elastic bandages for finger dressings. While arterial inflow was never compromised, pressures were high enough to occlude superficial venous outflow, which may begin at 20% bandage stretch. Pulse oximetry failed to detect changes distal to applied dressings, and we do not recommend it to detect digital vascular compromise in this setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of 2 Types of Local Anesthetic Techniques in the Reduction of Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study. Ischemia Time in Extremity Allotransplantation: A Comprehensive Review. The Super-Turbocharged End-to-Side Abductor Digiti Minimi and Anterior Interosseous Double Nerve Transfer Is Associated With Improved Ulnar Intrinsic Function. Chatbot Demonstrates Moderate Interrater Reliability in Billing for Hand Surgery Clinic Encounters. Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Traumatic Finger Amputation: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1