球度指数及其他多探头ct表现对穿孔性急性阑尾炎的预测价值。

Özlem Akıncı
{"title":"球度指数及其他多探头ct表现对穿孔性急性阑尾炎的预测价值。","authors":"Özlem Akıncı","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2023.45383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early radiological prediction and diagnosis of perforated acute appendicitis remain controversial. In the current study, it was aimed to examine the predictive value of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings in perforated acute appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients (n=542) who underwent appendectomy between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups as non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Preoperative abdom-inal MDCT findings, appendix sphericity index (ASI) scores, and laboratory findings were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 427 cases in the non-perforated group and 115 cases in the perforated group, with a mean age of 33.88±12.84 years. The mean time until admission was 2.06±1.43 days. Appendicolith, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, free air, and retroperitoneal space (RPS) involvement were all found to be significantly higher in the perforated group (P<0.001). The mean long axis, short axis, and ASI values were found to be higher in the perforated group (P<0.001; P=0.004; and P<0.001, respectively). C-reac-tive protein (CRP) was found to be significantly higher in the perforated group (P=0.008), but the mean white blood count was found to be similar between the groups (P=0.613). Among MDCT findings, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, high CRP, long axis, and ASI were observed to be predictive values for perforation. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, ASI had a cut-off value of 1.30, a sensitivity of 80.87%, and a specificity of 93.21%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDCT findings, namely, appendicolith, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, free air, and RPS involvement are significant findings for perforated appendicitis. With a high sensitivity and specificity, the ASI appears to be a key predictive parameter for perfo-rated acute appendicitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49398,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","volume":"29 5","pages":"590-595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/29/TJTES-29-590.PMC10277335.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive value of sphericity index and other multidetector computed tomography findings in perforated acute appendicitis.\",\"authors\":\"Özlem Akıncı\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/tjtes.2023.45383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early radiological prediction and diagnosis of perforated acute appendicitis remain controversial. In the current study, it was aimed to examine the predictive value of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings in perforated acute appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients (n=542) who underwent appendectomy between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups as non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Preoperative abdom-inal MDCT findings, appendix sphericity index (ASI) scores, and laboratory findings were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 427 cases in the non-perforated group and 115 cases in the perforated group, with a mean age of 33.88±12.84 years. The mean time until admission was 2.06±1.43 days. Appendicolith, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, free air, and retroperitoneal space (RPS) involvement were all found to be significantly higher in the perforated group (P<0.001). The mean long axis, short axis, and ASI values were found to be higher in the perforated group (P<0.001; P=0.004; and P<0.001, respectively). C-reac-tive protein (CRP) was found to be significantly higher in the perforated group (P=0.008), but the mean white blood count was found to be similar between the groups (P=0.613). Among MDCT findings, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, high CRP, long axis, and ASI were observed to be predictive values for perforation. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, ASI had a cut-off value of 1.30, a sensitivity of 80.87%, and a specificity of 93.21%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDCT findings, namely, appendicolith, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, free air, and RPS involvement are significant findings for perforated appendicitis. With a high sensitivity and specificity, the ASI appears to be a key predictive parameter for perfo-rated acute appendicitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"590-595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/29/TJTES-29-590.PMC10277335.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.45383\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.45383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:穿孔性急性阑尾炎的早期影像学预测和诊断仍有争议。本研究旨在探讨多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)对穿孔性急性阑尾炎的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年12月期间行阑尾切除术的患者(n=542)。将患者分为无穿孔阑尾炎和穿孔阑尾炎两组。评估术前腹部MDCT表现、阑尾球形指数(ASI)评分和实验室检查结果。结果:未穿孔组427例,穿孔组115例,平均年龄33.88±12.84岁。平均入院时间为2.06±1.43天。阑尾结肠炎、游离液、肠壁缺损、脓肿、游离气、腹膜后间隙(RPS)受累在穿孔组均明显增高(p结论:MDCT表现为阑尾结肠炎、游离液、肠壁缺损、脓肿、游离气、RPS受累是穿孔阑尾炎的重要表现。具有高敏感性和特异性,ASI似乎是穿孔急性阑尾炎的关键预测参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive value of sphericity index and other multidetector computed tomography findings in perforated acute appendicitis.

Background: Early radiological prediction and diagnosis of perforated acute appendicitis remain controversial. In the current study, it was aimed to examine the predictive value of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings in perforated acute appendicitis.

Methods: The patients (n=542) who underwent appendectomy between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups as non-perforated appendicitis and perforated appendicitis. Preoperative abdom-inal MDCT findings, appendix sphericity index (ASI) scores, and laboratory findings were evaluated.

Results: The sample consisted of 427 cases in the non-perforated group and 115 cases in the perforated group, with a mean age of 33.88±12.84 years. The mean time until admission was 2.06±1.43 days. Appendicolith, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, free air, and retroperitoneal space (RPS) involvement were all found to be significantly higher in the perforated group (P<0.001). The mean long axis, short axis, and ASI values were found to be higher in the perforated group (P<0.001; P=0.004; and P<0.001, respectively). C-reac-tive protein (CRP) was found to be significantly higher in the perforated group (P=0.008), but the mean white blood count was found to be similar between the groups (P=0.613). Among MDCT findings, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, high CRP, long axis, and ASI were observed to be predictive values for perforation. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, ASI had a cut-off value of 1.30, a sensitivity of 80.87%, and a specificity of 93.21%.

Conclusion: MDCT findings, namely, appendicolith, free fluid, wall defect, abscess, free air, and RPS involvement are significant findings for perforated appendicitis. With a high sensitivity and specificity, the ASI appears to be a key predictive parameter for perfo-rated acute appendicitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (TJTES) is an official publication of the Turkish Association of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. It is a double-blind and peer-reviewed periodical that considers for publication clinical and experimental studies, case reports, technical contributions, and letters to the editor. Scope of the journal covers the trauma and emergency surgery. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in their fields in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent reviewer to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye. The comparison of the suture materials on intestinal anastomotic healing: an experimental study. Research of Importance of Thiol, CRP and Lactate in Diagnosing Mesenteric Ischemia At An Early Stage: Animal Model. Trauma in pregnancy: An analysis of the adverse perinatal outcomes and the injury severity score. Is diagnostic laparoscopy necessary in the management of left thoracoabdominal stab wounds?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1