对血源性病原体传播的病毒感染危险因素态度的横断面研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en
Sunčica Ivanović, Sanja Trgovčević, Milena Cvetković Jovanović, Biljana Kocić, Suzana Milutinović
{"title":"对血源性病原体传播的病毒感染危险因素态度的横断面研究。","authors":"Sunčica Ivanović,&nbsp;Sanja Trgovčević,&nbsp;Milena Cvetković Jovanović,&nbsp;Biljana Kocić,&nbsp;Suzana Milutinović","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper was threefold: To assess risk factors of blood-borne pathogen exposure and viral infection for employees at their workplace, to spot the differences between groups of respondents without exposure and those exposed to blood-borne infections, and to identify main risk predictors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Cross-Sectional Study was conducted, surveying 203 employees, at the Institute for Emergency Medical Services in Serbia, which were eligible to enter the study and surveyed by Previously Developed Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97.60% of respondents have perceived risk at their workplace, but there were low numbers of HIV, HbcAg, and Anti-HCV testing and poor percent of vaccination for hepatitis B. There were no statistically significant differences between spotted groups of respondents in their attitudes. Three variables were predictors: accidental usedneedle stick injuries (OR = 90.34; 95% CI, 8.79-928.03), contact with the blood of patientsthrough the skin (OR = 176.94; 95% CI, 24.95-1254.61), and the years of service (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significance of this study is that it points to a double risk, because not only health workers are endangered, but also citizens who receive first aid.</p>","PeriodicalId":21229,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081622/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cross-Sectional Study of attitudes towards risk factors of viral infections transmitted by blood-borne pathogens.\",\"authors\":\"Sunčica Ivanović,&nbsp;Sanja Trgovčević,&nbsp;Milena Cvetković Jovanović,&nbsp;Biljana Kocić,&nbsp;Suzana Milutinović\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper was threefold: To assess risk factors of blood-borne pathogen exposure and viral infection for employees at their workplace, to spot the differences between groups of respondents without exposure and those exposed to blood-borne infections, and to identify main risk predictors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Cross-Sectional Study was conducted, surveying 203 employees, at the Institute for Emergency Medical Services in Serbia, which were eligible to enter the study and surveyed by Previously Developed Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97.60% of respondents have perceived risk at their workplace, but there were low numbers of HIV, HbcAg, and Anti-HCV testing and poor percent of vaccination for hepatitis B. There were no statistically significant differences between spotted groups of respondents in their attitudes. Three variables were predictors: accidental usedneedle stick injuries (OR = 90.34; 95% CI, 8.79-928.03), contact with the blood of patientsthrough the skin (OR = 176.94; 95% CI, 24.95-1254.61), and the years of service (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significance of this study is that it points to a double risk, because not only health workers are endangered, but also citizens who receive first aid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的有三个方面:评估工作场所员工血源性病原体暴露和病毒感染的危险因素,发现未暴露人群与血源性感染人群之间的差异,并确定主要风险预测因素。方法:采用横断面研究方法,对塞尔维亚紧急医疗服务研究所203名符合研究条件的员工进行调查,并采用先前开发的问卷进行调查。结果:97.60%的应答者意识到其工作场所存在风险,但HIV、HbcAg和Anti-HCV检测数量较少,乙肝疫苗接种率较低。各应答者对乙肝的态度差异无统计学意义。三个变量为预测因子:意外使用针头刺伤(OR = 90.34;95% CI, 8.79-928.03),通过皮肤接触患者血液(OR = 176.94;95% CI, 24.95-1254.61)和服务年限(OR = 0.92;95% ci, 0.86-1.00)。结论:这项研究的意义在于它指出了双重风险,因为不仅卫生工作者受到威胁,接受急救的公民也受到威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Cross-Sectional Study of attitudes towards risk factors of viral infections transmitted by blood-borne pathogens.

Objective: The objective of this paper was threefold: To assess risk factors of blood-borne pathogen exposure and viral infection for employees at their workplace, to spot the differences between groups of respondents without exposure and those exposed to blood-borne infections, and to identify main risk predictors.

Method: The Cross-Sectional Study was conducted, surveying 203 employees, at the Institute for Emergency Medical Services in Serbia, which were eligible to enter the study and surveyed by Previously Developed Questionnaire.

Results: A total of 97.60% of respondents have perceived risk at their workplace, but there were low numbers of HIV, HbcAg, and Anti-HCV testing and poor percent of vaccination for hepatitis B. There were no statistically significant differences between spotted groups of respondents in their attitudes. Three variables were predictors: accidental usedneedle stick injuries (OR = 90.34; 95% CI, 8.79-928.03), contact with the blood of patientsthrough the skin (OR = 176.94; 95% CI, 24.95-1254.61), and the years of service (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00).

Conclusion: The significance of this study is that it points to a double risk, because not only health workers are endangered, but also citizens who receive first aid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The University of São Paulo Nursing School Journal (Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, REEUSP) is a bimonthly periodical revised by fellow nurses, which has the objective of publishing empirical or theoretical articles that represent a significant advance for the professional practice or for the fundaments of Nursing Mission: to stimulate knowledge production and dissemination in Nursing and related areas, focusing on international interlocution to advance Nursing science. Areas of Interest: Nursing and Health Its abbreviated title is Rev Esc Enferm USP, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Intensity and frequency of moral distress in mental health nurses in Brazil. Misinformation about COVID-19 among middle-aged and older migrants residing in Brazil and Portugal. Access to health services for international migrants during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Pejotização and implications for nursing work in Brazil: repercussions of neoliberalism. Parental stress during pregnancy and maternity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1