肝动脉输注化疗加或不加Lenvatinib治疗不可切除肝癌的疗效分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY European Surgical Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000529475
Wei Yuan, Wenchao Yue, Huabing Wen, Xueqin Wang, Qi Wang
{"title":"肝动脉输注化疗加或不加Lenvatinib治疗不可切除肝癌的疗效分析。","authors":"Wei Yuan,&nbsp;Wenchao Yue,&nbsp;Huabing Wen,&nbsp;Xueqin Wang,&nbsp;Qi Wang","doi":"10.1159/000529475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a common and mature treatment, but the safety and efficacy of HAIC combined with lenvatinib for advanced HCC patient treatment remains unclear. Therefore, this study compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with or without lenvatinib in unresectable HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 13 unresectable advanced HCC patients who received HAIC monotherapy or combination therapy of HAIC and lenvatinib. Overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), incidence of adverse events (AEs), and changes in liver function were compared between the two groups. We applied a Cox regression analysis to evaluate the independent risk factors affecting survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ORR in the HAIC+lenvatinib group was markedly increased compared to the HAIC group (p &lt; 0.05), while the DCR in the HAIC group was higher (p &gt; 0.05). No notable difference was found between the two groups in median OS and PFS (p &gt; 0.05). Compared to the HAIC+lenvatinib group, more patients had improved liver function in the HAIC group after treatment, but the difference was not dramatical (p &gt; 0.05). The AEs incidence was 100.00% in both groups, which was relieved with corresponding treatment. Besides, Cox regression analysis did not identify independent risk factors related to OS and PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combination therapy of HAIC and lenvatinib notably performed better than the HAIC monotherapy in patients with unresectable HCC in terms of ORR and was well tolerated, which deserves further investigation with large-scale clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":"64 2","pages":"268-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis on Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy with or without Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Yuan,&nbsp;Wenchao Yue,&nbsp;Huabing Wen,&nbsp;Xueqin Wang,&nbsp;Qi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a common and mature treatment, but the safety and efficacy of HAIC combined with lenvatinib for advanced HCC patient treatment remains unclear. Therefore, this study compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with or without lenvatinib in unresectable HCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 13 unresectable advanced HCC patients who received HAIC monotherapy or combination therapy of HAIC and lenvatinib. Overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), incidence of adverse events (AEs), and changes in liver function were compared between the two groups. We applied a Cox regression analysis to evaluate the independent risk factors affecting survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ORR in the HAIC+lenvatinib group was markedly increased compared to the HAIC group (p &lt; 0.05), while the DCR in the HAIC group was higher (p &gt; 0.05). No notable difference was found between the two groups in median OS and PFS (p &gt; 0.05). Compared to the HAIC+lenvatinib group, more patients had improved liver function in the HAIC group after treatment, but the difference was not dramatical (p &gt; 0.05). The AEs incidence was 100.00% in both groups, which was relieved with corresponding treatment. Besides, Cox regression analysis did not identify independent risk factors related to OS and PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combination therapy of HAIC and lenvatinib notably performed better than the HAIC monotherapy in patients with unresectable HCC in terms of ORR and was well tolerated, which deserves further investigation with large-scale clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Surgical Research\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"268-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Surgical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529475\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者,肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)是一种常见且成熟的治疗方法,但HAIC联合lenvatinib治疗晚期HCC患者的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。因此,本研究比较了HAIC加lenvatinib或不加lenvatinib治疗不可切除HCC患者的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析13例接受HAIC单药或HAIC与lenvatinib联合治疗的晚期HCC不可切除患者。比较两组患者的总生存期(OS)、疾病控制率(DCR)、客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、不良事件发生率(ae)和肝功能变化。我们应用Cox回归分析来评估影响生存结局的独立危险因素。结果:与HAIC组相比,HAIC+lenvatinib组的ORR明显升高(p <0.05),而HAIC组的DCR更高(p >0.05)。两组患者的中位OS和PFS无显著差异(p >0.05)。与HAIC+lenvatinib组相比,HAIC组治疗后肝功能改善的患者较多,但差异不显著(p >0.05)。两组ae发生率均为100.00%,经相应治疗后缓解。Cox回归分析未发现与OS和PFS相关的独立危险因素。结论:HAIC联合lenvatinib治疗不可切除HCC患者的ORR明显优于HAIC单药治疗,且耐受性良好,值得进一步开展大规模临床试验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis on Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy with or without Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Introduction: For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a common and mature treatment, but the safety and efficacy of HAIC combined with lenvatinib for advanced HCC patient treatment remains unclear. Therefore, this study compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with or without lenvatinib in unresectable HCC patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 13 unresectable advanced HCC patients who received HAIC monotherapy or combination therapy of HAIC and lenvatinib. Overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), incidence of adverse events (AEs), and changes in liver function were compared between the two groups. We applied a Cox regression analysis to evaluate the independent risk factors affecting survival outcomes.

Results: The ORR in the HAIC+lenvatinib group was markedly increased compared to the HAIC group (p < 0.05), while the DCR in the HAIC group was higher (p > 0.05). No notable difference was found between the two groups in median OS and PFS (p > 0.05). Compared to the HAIC+lenvatinib group, more patients had improved liver function in the HAIC group after treatment, but the difference was not dramatical (p > 0.05). The AEs incidence was 100.00% in both groups, which was relieved with corresponding treatment. Besides, Cox regression analysis did not identify independent risk factors related to OS and PFS.

Conclusion: Combination therapy of HAIC and lenvatinib notably performed better than the HAIC monotherapy in patients with unresectable HCC in terms of ORR and was well tolerated, which deserves further investigation with large-scale clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.
期刊最新文献
Intestinal mucosal perfusion and integrity are maintained in hypotensive brain dead mice. Rationale and Trial Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to assess the Impact of a Concomitant Crural Repair during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with a Lax Gastroesophageal Junction without Frank Hiatal Hernia (REPAIR trial protocol). Recycling transplanted organs: An exceptional case and literature review. Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: The Future is Now. The Effect of Oral Fluid Administration 1 Hour before Surgery on Preoperative Anxiety and Gastric Volume in Pediatric Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1