使用患者教育移动应用程序提高肠道准备质量的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMJ Open Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001107
Hang Viet Dao, Quan Viet Dao, Hoa Ngoc Lam, Long Bao Hoang, Van Thi Nguyen, Thuy Thi Nguyen, Dat Quoc Vu, Christopher S Pokorny, Hoa Lan Nguyen, Jeroan Allison, Robert Joel Goldberg, An Thi Minh Dao, Toan Thanh Thi Do, Long Van Dao
{"title":"使用患者教育移动应用程序提高肠道准备质量的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Hang Viet Dao,&nbsp;Quan Viet Dao,&nbsp;Hoa Ngoc Lam,&nbsp;Long Bao Hoang,&nbsp;Van Thi Nguyen,&nbsp;Thuy Thi Nguyen,&nbsp;Dat Quoc Vu,&nbsp;Christopher S Pokorny,&nbsp;Hoa Lan Nguyen,&nbsp;Jeroan Allison,&nbsp;Robert Joel Goldberg,&nbsp;An Thi Minh Dao,&nbsp;Toan Thanh Thi Do,&nbsp;Long Van Dao","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of a mobile application (app) in improving the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An endoscopist-blinded randomised controlled trial enrolled patients who were undergoing a colonoscopy on the same day of bowel preparation. The intervention used a Vietnamese mobile app that provides instructions on bowel preparation while patients in the comparison group received conventional instructions. Outcomes included the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) to assess the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study recruited 515 patients (256 in the intervention group). The median age was 42 years, 50.9% were females, 69.1% high school graduates and higher, and 45.2% from urban area. Patients in the intervention group had higher adherence to instructions (60.9% vs 52.4%, p=0.05) and longer length of taking laxatives (mean difference 0.17 hours, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.27). The intervention did not reduce the risk of poor bowel cleansing (total BBPS<6) in both overall (7.4% vs 7.7%; risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.76) and subgroup analysis. PDR and ADR were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mobile app providing instructions on proper bowel preparation improved the practice during bowel preparation but did not improve the quality of bowel cleansing or PDR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/a8/bmjgast-2023-001107.PMC10255132.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of using a patient education mobile application to improve the quality of bowel preparation: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hang Viet Dao,&nbsp;Quan Viet Dao,&nbsp;Hoa Ngoc Lam,&nbsp;Long Bao Hoang,&nbsp;Van Thi Nguyen,&nbsp;Thuy Thi Nguyen,&nbsp;Dat Quoc Vu,&nbsp;Christopher S Pokorny,&nbsp;Hoa Lan Nguyen,&nbsp;Jeroan Allison,&nbsp;Robert Joel Goldberg,&nbsp;An Thi Minh Dao,&nbsp;Toan Thanh Thi Do,&nbsp;Long Van Dao\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of a mobile application (app) in improving the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An endoscopist-blinded randomised controlled trial enrolled patients who were undergoing a colonoscopy on the same day of bowel preparation. The intervention used a Vietnamese mobile app that provides instructions on bowel preparation while patients in the comparison group received conventional instructions. Outcomes included the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) to assess the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study recruited 515 patients (256 in the intervention group). The median age was 42 years, 50.9% were females, 69.1% high school graduates and higher, and 45.2% from urban area. Patients in the intervention group had higher adherence to instructions (60.9% vs 52.4%, p=0.05) and longer length of taking laxatives (mean difference 0.17 hours, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.27). The intervention did not reduce the risk of poor bowel cleansing (total BBPS<6) in both overall (7.4% vs 7.7%; risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.76) and subgroup analysis. PDR and ADR were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mobile app providing instructions on proper bowel preparation improved the practice during bowel preparation but did not improve the quality of bowel cleansing or PDR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/a8/bmjgast-2023-001107.PMC10255132.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定移动应用程序(app)在提高结肠镜检查肠道准备质量方面的有效性。方法:一项内镜盲法随机对照试验纳入了在肠准备当天进行结肠镜检查的患者。干预使用越南移动应用程序,该应用程序提供肠道准备指导,而对照组患者则接受常规指导。结果包括波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评估肠准备质量、息肉检出率(PDR)和腺瘤检出率(ADR)。结果:共纳入515例患者(干预组256例)。年龄中位数为42岁,女性占50.9%,高中及以上学历占69.1%,城镇人口占45.2%。干预组患者对医嘱的依从性更高(60.9% vs 52.4%, p=0.05),服用泻药的时间更长(平均差异0.17小时,95% CI 0.06 ~ 0.27)。干预并没有降低排便不良的风险(总bbps)。结论:提供适当排便指导的移动应用程序改善了排便过程中的做法,但没有提高排便或PDR的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of using a patient education mobile application to improve the quality of bowel preparation: a randomised controlled trial.

Aims: To determine the effectiveness of a mobile application (app) in improving the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Method: An endoscopist-blinded randomised controlled trial enrolled patients who were undergoing a colonoscopy on the same day of bowel preparation. The intervention used a Vietnamese mobile app that provides instructions on bowel preparation while patients in the comparison group received conventional instructions. Outcomes included the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) to assess the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR).

Results: The study recruited 515 patients (256 in the intervention group). The median age was 42 years, 50.9% were females, 69.1% high school graduates and higher, and 45.2% from urban area. Patients in the intervention group had higher adherence to instructions (60.9% vs 52.4%, p=0.05) and longer length of taking laxatives (mean difference 0.17 hours, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.27). The intervention did not reduce the risk of poor bowel cleansing (total BBPS<6) in both overall (7.4% vs 7.7%; risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.76) and subgroup analysis. PDR and ADR were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions: The mobile app providing instructions on proper bowel preparation improved the practice during bowel preparation but did not improve the quality of bowel cleansing or PDR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Seasonal variations in peptic ulcer disease incidence in Taiwan, a country spanning both tropical and subtropical regions: a real-world database analysis. Predictors for colectomy in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qualitative service evaluation of a multimodal pilot service for early detection of liver disease in high-risk groups: 'Alright My Liver?' Development of a nomogram for predicting pancreatic portal hypertension in patients with acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study. Exploring the feasibility of home-delivered capsule endoscopy with 5G support: innovations and carbon footprint insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1