苯甲酸埃维菌素树干注射对邻近白蜡树防绿灰螟及已有生物防治剂的影响。

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Economic Entomology Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1093/jee/toad074
Jian J Duan, Ryan S Crandall, Donald M Grosman, Jonathan M Schmude, Nicole Quinn, Jennifer L Chandler, Joseph S Elkinton
{"title":"苯甲酸埃维菌素树干注射对邻近白蜡树防绿灰螟及已有生物防治剂的影响。","authors":"Jian J Duan,&nbsp;Ryan S Crandall,&nbsp;Donald M Grosman,&nbsp;Jonathan M Schmude,&nbsp;Nicole Quinn,&nbsp;Jennifer L Chandler,&nbsp;Joseph S Elkinton","doi":"10.1093/jee/toad074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, is the most destructive invasive pest on ash (Fraxinus spp.) in the United States. We determined whether ash trees injected with emamectin benzoate (EB) could protect untreated neighboring ash trees. We also determined whether the selective treatment of ash trees with EB injections had adverse effects on the establishment of introduced larval parasitoids Tetrastichus planipennis Yang and Spathius galinae Belokobylskij & Strazenac. In experiment one, trees were treated with EB and then retreated 3 years later. Five years post initial treatment, we found that 90% of treated ash trees retained healthy crowns, significantly higher than those of untreated control ash trees (16%). For experiment two, trees only received one treatment of EB and after 2 years 100% of treated ash trees retained healthy crowns, significantly higher than those of untreated ash trees (50%). In both experiments, we found that distance from the central EB-treated tree was not a significant predictor for tree health or presence of EAB exit holes. Although distance from the EB-treated trees appeared to have a significant positive relationship with woodpecker feeding signs on neighboring trees, such relationships did not result in significant differences in the proportion of neighboring ash trees retaining healthy crowns between EB treatment and control plots. The introduced EAB parasitoids appeared to have established equally well between treatment and control plots. Findings are discussed in the context of integration of EB trunk injection with biological control for protection of North American ash against EAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":15632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Entomology","volume":"116 3","pages":"848-854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of emamectin benzoate trunk injections on protection of neighboring ash trees against emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and on established biological control agents.\",\"authors\":\"Jian J Duan,&nbsp;Ryan S Crandall,&nbsp;Donald M Grosman,&nbsp;Jonathan M Schmude,&nbsp;Nicole Quinn,&nbsp;Jennifer L Chandler,&nbsp;Joseph S Elkinton\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jee/toad074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, is the most destructive invasive pest on ash (Fraxinus spp.) in the United States. We determined whether ash trees injected with emamectin benzoate (EB) could protect untreated neighboring ash trees. We also determined whether the selective treatment of ash trees with EB injections had adverse effects on the establishment of introduced larval parasitoids Tetrastichus planipennis Yang and Spathius galinae Belokobylskij & Strazenac. In experiment one, trees were treated with EB and then retreated 3 years later. Five years post initial treatment, we found that 90% of treated ash trees retained healthy crowns, significantly higher than those of untreated control ash trees (16%). For experiment two, trees only received one treatment of EB and after 2 years 100% of treated ash trees retained healthy crowns, significantly higher than those of untreated ash trees (50%). In both experiments, we found that distance from the central EB-treated tree was not a significant predictor for tree health or presence of EAB exit holes. Although distance from the EB-treated trees appeared to have a significant positive relationship with woodpecker feeding signs on neighboring trees, such relationships did not result in significant differences in the proportion of neighboring ash trees retaining healthy crowns between EB treatment and control plots. The introduced EAB parasitoids appeared to have established equally well between treatment and control plots. Findings are discussed in the context of integration of EB trunk injection with biological control for protection of North American ash against EAB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Entomology\",\"volume\":\"116 3\",\"pages\":\"848-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

绿灰螟虫(Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire)是美国最具破坏性的入侵害虫。研究了注射苯甲酸埃维菌素(emamectin benzoate, EB)的白蜡树是否能保护周围未处理的白蜡树。我们还研究了EB注射剂选择性处理白蜡树是否会对引进幼虫寄生蜂Tetrastichus planipennis Yang和Spathius galinae Belokobylskij & Strazenac的建立产生不利影响。试验1施用EB, 3年后退场。初步处理5年后,我们发现90%的处理过的白蜡树保留了健康的树冠,显著高于未处理的对照白蜡树(16%)。试验2只处理1次EB, 2年后,处理过的白蜡树100%保留了健康树冠,显著高于未处理的50%。在这两个实验中,我们发现与eb处理树中心的距离并不是树木健康或EAB出口孔存在的重要预测因子。虽然与EB处理过的树木的距离与啄木鸟在邻近树木上的取食迹象呈显著正相关,但这种关系并未导致EB处理过的树木与对照地之间邻近白蜡树保留健康树冠的比例存在显著差异。引入的EAB类寄生物在处理区和对照区之间似乎同样良好。研究结果在EB树干注射与生物防治结合的背景下进行了讨论,以保护北美白蜡树免受EAB的侵害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of emamectin benzoate trunk injections on protection of neighboring ash trees against emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and on established biological control agents.

The emerald ash borer (EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, is the most destructive invasive pest on ash (Fraxinus spp.) in the United States. We determined whether ash trees injected with emamectin benzoate (EB) could protect untreated neighboring ash trees. We also determined whether the selective treatment of ash trees with EB injections had adverse effects on the establishment of introduced larval parasitoids Tetrastichus planipennis Yang and Spathius galinae Belokobylskij & Strazenac. In experiment one, trees were treated with EB and then retreated 3 years later. Five years post initial treatment, we found that 90% of treated ash trees retained healthy crowns, significantly higher than those of untreated control ash trees (16%). For experiment two, trees only received one treatment of EB and after 2 years 100% of treated ash trees retained healthy crowns, significantly higher than those of untreated ash trees (50%). In both experiments, we found that distance from the central EB-treated tree was not a significant predictor for tree health or presence of EAB exit holes. Although distance from the EB-treated trees appeared to have a significant positive relationship with woodpecker feeding signs on neighboring trees, such relationships did not result in significant differences in the proportion of neighboring ash trees retaining healthy crowns between EB treatment and control plots. The introduced EAB parasitoids appeared to have established equally well between treatment and control plots. Findings are discussed in the context of integration of EB trunk injection with biological control for protection of North American ash against EAB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
198
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Economic Entomology the most-cited entomological journal – publishes articles on the economic significance of insects and other arthropods and includes sections on apiculture & social insects, insecticides, biological control, household & structural insects, crop protection, forest entomology, and more. In addition to research papers, Journal of Economic Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, Short Communications, and Letters to the Editor. The journal is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December.
期刊最新文献
Reviewers for Journal of Economic Entomology (November 2022–October 2023) 2-Methoxybenzaldehyde effectively repels ants Phenolic secondary metabolites from Acorus calamus (Acorales: Acoraceae) rhizomes: the feeding deterrents for Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Sampling Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) in 2 coffee bean warehouses in New Jersey. Biology and management of hemp russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1