All-Inside Versus Outside-in Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Peripheral Tears

Purpose

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) peripheral tears with persistent wrist pain can be treated with arthroscopic surgical repair owing to vascularization of the peripheral region. The safety and efficacy of all-inside repair has been shown in prior case series. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of arthroscopic peripheral TFCC repair: all-inside vertical mattress and outside-in horizontal mattress.

Methods

A 5-year retrospective review was performed on patients treated from 2016 to 2021 with wrist arthroscopy and TFCC repair for Palmer 1B tears. Patients with ulnar extrinsic ligament repair, distal radioulnar joint instability, concomitant ulnar shortening osteotomy, and extensor carpi ulnaris instability were excluded. Patient therapy and office visit records were reviewed. Outcomes including Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH); range of motion; grip strength; immobilization time; complications; and need for revision procedures were compared.

Results

Fifty-two patients were included in the study, 32 in the outside-in group and 20 in the all-inside group. The average follow-up length was 24.8 weeks, with similar range of motion and strength in both groups. The average postoperative QuickDASH score was 13 in the outside-in group and 9 in the all-inside group at 43.5 months, compared with the preoperative QuickDASH scores of 47 and 50, respectively. Mean immobilization time was longer for outside-in than for all-inside (5.25 vs 2.0 weeks, respectively).

Conclusions

All-inside arthroscopic peripheral TFCC repair showed range of motion, grip strength, complications, revisions, and postoperative improvement in QuickDASH scores similar to those with the outside-in technique.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV; retrospective comparative study.