医院急诊科的药剂师护理:西班牙医院药剂学和急诊医学协会的共识文件。

Jesús Ruiz Ramos, Beatriz Calderón Hernanz, Yolanda Castellanos Clemente, Manuel Bonete Sánchez, Emili Vallve Alcon, M ª Rosario Santolaya Perrin, M ª Ángeles García Martín, Ana de Lorenzo Pinto, José Manuel Real Campaña, Javier Ramos Rodríguez, Cristina Calzón Blanco, Milagros García Peláez, Héctor Alonso Ramos, Joan Altimiras Ruiz, Paloma Sempere Serrano, María Martín Cerezuela, Leonor Periañez Parraga, Ana María Juanes Borrego, Beatriz Somoza Fernández, Juan Manuel Rodríguez Camacho, Mireia Puig Campmany, Iria Miguens Blanco, Santiago Tomás Vecina, Catalina Nadal Galmes, Javier Povar Marco
{"title":"医院急诊科的药剂师护理:西班牙医院药剂学和急诊医学协会的共识文件。","authors":"Jesús Ruiz Ramos, Beatriz Calderón Hernanz, Yolanda Castellanos Clemente, Manuel Bonete Sánchez, Emili Vallve Alcon, M ª Rosario Santolaya Perrin, M ª Ángeles García Martín, Ana de Lorenzo Pinto, José Manuel Real Campaña, Javier Ramos Rodríguez, Cristina Calzón Blanco, Milagros García Peláez, Héctor Alonso Ramos, Joan Altimiras Ruiz, Paloma Sempere Serrano, María Martín Cerezuela, Leonor Periañez Parraga, Ana María Juanes Borrego, Beatriz Somoza Fernández, Juan Manuel Rodríguez Camacho, Mireia Puig Campmany, Iria Miguens Blanco, Santiago Tomás Vecina, Catalina Nadal Galmes, Javier Povar Marco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To draft a list of actions and quality indicators for pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments, based on consensus among a panel of experts regarding which actions to prioritize in this setting.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) evaluated a preliminary list of potential actions and quality of care indicators. The experts used a questionnaire to assess the proposals on the basis of available evidence. In the first round, each expert individually assessed the importance of each proposed action based on 4 dimensions: evidence base, impact on clinical response and patient safety, ease of implementation, and priority. In the second round the experts attended a virtual meeting to reach consensus on a revised list of proposals; suggestions and comments that had been made anonymously in the first round were included. The group then prioritized each action as basic, intermediate, or advanced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experts evaluated a total of 26 potential actions and associated quality indicators. No items were eliminated in the analysis of scores and comments from the first round. After the second round, 25 actions survived. Nine were considered basic, 10 intermediate, and 6 advanced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expert panel's list of pharmacist actions and care quality indicators provides a basis for developing a pharmacist care program in Spanish emergency departments on 3 levels of priority. The list can serve as a guide to pharmacists, managers, physicians, and nurses involved in the effort to improve drug therapy in this hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11644,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 3","pages":"205-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments: a consensus paper from the Spanish hospital pharmacy and emergency medicine associations.\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Ruiz Ramos, Beatriz Calderón Hernanz, Yolanda Castellanos Clemente, Manuel Bonete Sánchez, Emili Vallve Alcon, M ª Rosario Santolaya Perrin, M ª Ángeles García Martín, Ana de Lorenzo Pinto, José Manuel Real Campaña, Javier Ramos Rodríguez, Cristina Calzón Blanco, Milagros García Peláez, Héctor Alonso Ramos, Joan Altimiras Ruiz, Paloma Sempere Serrano, María Martín Cerezuela, Leonor Periañez Parraga, Ana María Juanes Borrego, Beatriz Somoza Fernández, Juan Manuel Rodríguez Camacho, Mireia Puig Campmany, Iria Miguens Blanco, Santiago Tomás Vecina, Catalina Nadal Galmes, Javier Povar Marco\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To draft a list of actions and quality indicators for pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments, based on consensus among a panel of experts regarding which actions to prioritize in this setting.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) evaluated a preliminary list of potential actions and quality of care indicators. The experts used a questionnaire to assess the proposals on the basis of available evidence. In the first round, each expert individually assessed the importance of each proposed action based on 4 dimensions: evidence base, impact on clinical response and patient safety, ease of implementation, and priority. In the second round the experts attended a virtual meeting to reach consensus on a revised list of proposals; suggestions and comments that had been made anonymously in the first round were included. The group then prioritized each action as basic, intermediate, or advanced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experts evaluated a total of 26 potential actions and associated quality indicators. No items were eliminated in the analysis of scores and comments from the first round. After the second round, 25 actions survived. Nine were considered basic, 10 intermediate, and 6 advanced.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expert panel's list of pharmacist actions and care quality indicators provides a basis for developing a pharmacist care program in Spanish emergency departments on 3 levels of priority. The list can serve as a guide to pharmacists, managers, physicians, and nurses involved in the effort to improve drug therapy in this hospital setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"205-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在专家小组就医院急诊科优先采取哪些行动达成共识的基础上,起草一份医院急诊科药剂师护理行动和质量指标清单:由西班牙医院药学协会 (SEFH) 和西班牙急诊医学协会 (SEMES) 专家组成的专家小组评估了一份潜在行动和护理质量指标的初步清单。专家们使用调查问卷,根据现有证据对建议进行评估。在第一轮评估中,每位专家根据证据基础、对临床反应和患者安全的影响、实施的难易程度以及优先级 4 个方面,分别评估了每项建议行动的重要性。在第二轮中,专家们参加了一次虚拟会议,就修订后的建议清单达成共识;第一轮中匿名提出的建议和意见也被纳入其中。然后,专家组将每项行动分为基础、中级和高级:专家们共评估了 26 项潜在行动和相关质量指标。在对第一轮的评分和意见进行分析时,没有任何项目被淘汰。经过第二轮评估,有 25 项行动得以保留。其中 9 项为基础行动,10 项为中级行动,6 项为高级行动:专家小组的药剂师行动和护理质量指标清单为在西班牙急诊科按 3 个优先级别制定药剂师护理计划提供了依据。该清单可作为药剂师、管理人员、医生和护士在医院环境中改善药物治疗的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments: a consensus paper from the Spanish hospital pharmacy and emergency medicine associations.

Objectives: To draft a list of actions and quality indicators for pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments, based on consensus among a panel of experts regarding which actions to prioritize in this setting.

Material and methods: A panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) evaluated a preliminary list of potential actions and quality of care indicators. The experts used a questionnaire to assess the proposals on the basis of available evidence. In the first round, each expert individually assessed the importance of each proposed action based on 4 dimensions: evidence base, impact on clinical response and patient safety, ease of implementation, and priority. In the second round the experts attended a virtual meeting to reach consensus on a revised list of proposals; suggestions and comments that had been made anonymously in the first round were included. The group then prioritized each action as basic, intermediate, or advanced.

Results: The experts evaluated a total of 26 potential actions and associated quality indicators. No items were eliminated in the analysis of scores and comments from the first round. After the second round, 25 actions survived. Nine were considered basic, 10 intermediate, and 6 advanced.

Conclusion: The expert panel's list of pharmacist actions and care quality indicators provides a basis for developing a pharmacist care program in Spanish emergency departments on 3 levels of priority. The list can serve as a guide to pharmacists, managers, physicians, and nurses involved in the effort to improve drug therapy in this hospital setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pioneering Spanish book on psychiatric emergencies from 1928, by César Juarros. Rapunzel syndrome in the emergency department. Complexity of care in the emergency department: Shall we treat the whole person to prevent revisits? Considerations regarding the use of the sex/gender variable in research: moving towards good practice. Progenders decalogue. We must be doing something right.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1