审视全球护理监管应对COVID-19大流行的情况

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Regulation Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00071-6
Nicole Kaminski-Ozturk PhD, Brendan Martin PhD
{"title":"审视全球护理监管应对COVID-19大流行的情况","authors":"Nicole Kaminski-Ozturk PhD,&nbsp;Brendan Martin PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00071-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing regulatory bodies (NRBs) worldwide adopted a variety of measures to bolster the nursing workforce and ensure patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To examine the plethora of actions undertaken by the global nursing community in response to the public health emergency so that NRBs can increase transparency and better prepare for future crises.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In early 2021, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing developed an online survey to capture data on the global regulatory response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey focused on five specific domains: (a) governance, (b) telehealth practices, (c) nurse mobility, (d) prelicensure education, and (e) the disciplinary process. The instrument was translated into 11 languages before being deployed to 150 non-U.S. regulatory representatives. Frequencies and proportions were generated for all fixed-item responses, and descriptive content analyses were applied to translated open-text responses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regulators representing 27 jurisdictions provided valid responses to the survey. Most jurisdictions reported that components of nursing education were adapted in some way during the pandemic. More than half (53.8%, <em>n</em> = 14) of respondents indicated that changes were made to clinical and didactic curricula to ensure students graduated on time. About one-third (30.8%, <em>n</em> = 8) of representatives revealed that their jurisdiction had made changes to telehealth regulations, with many granting telehealth-specific nursing licenses. Most jurisdictions (88.5%, <em>n</em> = 23) also reported fewer or about the same number of regulatory complaints compared to before the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study highlight the range of actions nursing regulators worldwide adopted, which may be drawn upon to inform best practices to ensure jurisdictions are ready for the next public health emergency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Global Nursing Regulatory Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Kaminski-Ozturk PhD,&nbsp;Brendan Martin PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00071-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing regulatory bodies (NRBs) worldwide adopted a variety of measures to bolster the nursing workforce and ensure patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To examine the plethora of actions undertaken by the global nursing community in response to the public health emergency so that NRBs can increase transparency and better prepare for future crises.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In early 2021, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing developed an online survey to capture data on the global regulatory response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey focused on five specific domains: (a) governance, (b) telehealth practices, (c) nurse mobility, (d) prelicensure education, and (e) the disciplinary process. The instrument was translated into 11 languages before being deployed to 150 non-U.S. regulatory representatives. Frequencies and proportions were generated for all fixed-item responses, and descriptive content analyses were applied to translated open-text responses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regulators representing 27 jurisdictions provided valid responses to the survey. Most jurisdictions reported that components of nursing education were adapted in some way during the pandemic. More than half (53.8%, <em>n</em> = 14) of respondents indicated that changes were made to clinical and didactic curricula to ensure students graduated on time. About one-third (30.8%, <em>n</em> = 8) of representatives revealed that their jurisdiction had made changes to telehealth regulations, with many granting telehealth-specific nursing licenses. Most jurisdictions (88.5%, <em>n</em> = 23) also reported fewer or about the same number of regulatory complaints compared to before the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study highlight the range of actions nursing regulators worldwide adopted, which may be drawn upon to inform best practices to ensure jurisdictions are ready for the next public health emergency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Regulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074068/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825623000716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825623000716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,世界各地的护理监管机构采取了各种措施来加强护理队伍并确保患者安全。目的审查全球护理界为应对突发公共卫生事件而采取的过多行动,以便国家护理机构能够提高透明度并更好地为未来的危机做好准备。方法2021年初,美国国家护理委员会(National Council of State Boards of Nursing)开展了一项在线调查,以获取全球监管机构应对COVID-19大流行的数据。调查的重点是五个具体领域:(a)治理,(b)远程保健实践,(c)护士流动性,(d)执照前教育,以及(e)纪律程序。该仪器被翻译成11种语言,然后部署到150个非美国国家。管理代表。对所有固定项目回答生成频率和比例,并对翻译后的开放文本回答进行描述性内容分析。来自27个司法管辖区的监管机构对调查提供了有效答复。大多数司法管辖区报告说,在大流行期间,护理教育的组成部分以某种方式进行了调整。超过一半(53.8%,n = 14)的受访者表示,为了确保学生按时毕业,他们对临床和教学课程进行了调整。约三分之一(30.8%,n = 8)的代表透露,他们的辖区修改了远程保健条例,许多代表颁发了远程保健专用护理许可证。与大流行前相比,大多数司法管辖区(88.5%,n = 23)报告的监管投诉数量也有所减少或大致相同。本研究的结果突出了世界各地护理监管机构采取的一系列行动,这些行动可作为最佳做法的参考,以确保辖区为下一次突发公共卫生事件做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Global Nursing Regulatory Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing regulatory bodies (NRBs) worldwide adopted a variety of measures to bolster the nursing workforce and ensure patient safety.

Purpose

To examine the plethora of actions undertaken by the global nursing community in response to the public health emergency so that NRBs can increase transparency and better prepare for future crises.

Methods

In early 2021, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing developed an online survey to capture data on the global regulatory response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey focused on five specific domains: (a) governance, (b) telehealth practices, (c) nurse mobility, (d) prelicensure education, and (e) the disciplinary process. The instrument was translated into 11 languages before being deployed to 150 non-U.S. regulatory representatives. Frequencies and proportions were generated for all fixed-item responses, and descriptive content analyses were applied to translated open-text responses.

Results

Regulators representing 27 jurisdictions provided valid responses to the survey. Most jurisdictions reported that components of nursing education were adapted in some way during the pandemic. More than half (53.8%, n = 14) of respondents indicated that changes were made to clinical and didactic curricula to ensure students graduated on time. About one-third (30.8%, n = 8) of representatives revealed that their jurisdiction had made changes to telehealth regulations, with many granting telehealth-specific nursing licenses. Most jurisdictions (88.5%, n = 23) also reported fewer or about the same number of regulatory complaints compared to before the pandemic.

Conclusions

The results of this study highlight the range of actions nursing regulators worldwide adopted, which may be drawn upon to inform best practices to ensure jurisdictions are ready for the next public health emergency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Errata Highlights of the Nurse Licensure Compact Survey Findings: Nurses’ Needs, Experiences, and Views Ethical Decision-Making Among Nurses Participating in Social Media: A Grounded Theory Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1