非特异性颈部疼痛患者颈颅动觉感受性的聚类分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2229422
Munlika Sremakaew, Supatcha Konghakote, Sureeporn Uthaikhup
{"title":"非特异性颈部疼痛患者颈颅动觉感受性的聚类分析。","authors":"Munlika Sremakaew, Supatcha Konghakote, Sureeporn Uthaikhup","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2229422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inter-individual variability may contribute to impaired cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility (CKS) in patients with nonspecific neck pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify subgroups of participants with nonspecific neck pain based on cervical joint position errors (JPEs) and to determine potential factors associated with identified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred participants with nonspecific neck pain (unidentified pathoanatomical cause) and 50 controls were recruited. JPEs were measured in cervical extension and rotation, using a laser pointer. JPEs were expressed as absolute (AEs), constant (CEs), and variable (VEs) errors. Clinical characteristics were pain intensity, duration, disability, side of pain, dizziness, psychological features, and range of motion. All tests were performed within 1 day. A cluster analysis was conducted based on AEs. A logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the cluster groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis divided neck pain participants into two groups: cluster 1 with greater impaired CKS (<i>n</i> = 36) and cluster 2 with lesser impaired CKS (<i>n</i> = 64). The AEs (all cervical movements) and CE (left rotation) were larger in cluster 1 than 2 (<i>p</i> ≤ .002). Overall, participants in clusters 1 and 2 had larger AEs, CEs, and VEs than controls (<i>p</i> ≤ .04). The presence of dizziness was a risk factor associated with cluster 1 (OR<i>=</i>2.5, <i>p</i> = .04). The other characteristics were not associated with the cluster groups (<i>p</i> ≥ .09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AEs identified two subgroups of patients with nonspecific neck pain. Participants in subgroup 1 had greater impaired CKS, and participants in subgroup 2 had lesser impaired CKS. Dizziness was a potential risk factor associated with greater impaired CKS.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1952-1960"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cluster analysis of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in persons with nonspecific neck pain.\",\"authors\":\"Munlika Sremakaew, Supatcha Konghakote, Sureeporn Uthaikhup\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2229422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inter-individual variability may contribute to impaired cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility (CKS) in patients with nonspecific neck pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify subgroups of participants with nonspecific neck pain based on cervical joint position errors (JPEs) and to determine potential factors associated with identified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred participants with nonspecific neck pain (unidentified pathoanatomical cause) and 50 controls were recruited. JPEs were measured in cervical extension and rotation, using a laser pointer. JPEs were expressed as absolute (AEs), constant (CEs), and variable (VEs) errors. Clinical characteristics were pain intensity, duration, disability, side of pain, dizziness, psychological features, and range of motion. All tests were performed within 1 day. A cluster analysis was conducted based on AEs. A logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the cluster groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis divided neck pain participants into two groups: cluster 1 with greater impaired CKS (<i>n</i> = 36) and cluster 2 with lesser impaired CKS (<i>n</i> = 64). The AEs (all cervical movements) and CE (left rotation) were larger in cluster 1 than 2 (<i>p</i> ≤ .002). Overall, participants in clusters 1 and 2 had larger AEs, CEs, and VEs than controls (<i>p</i> ≤ .04). The presence of dizziness was a risk factor associated with cluster 1 (OR<i>=</i>2.5, <i>p</i> = .04). The other characteristics were not associated with the cluster groups (<i>p</i> ≥ .09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AEs identified two subgroups of patients with nonspecific neck pain. Participants in subgroup 1 had greater impaired CKS, and participants in subgroup 2 had lesser impaired CKS. Dizziness was a potential risk factor associated with greater impaired CKS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1952-1960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2229422\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2229422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:个体间的差异性可能会导致非特异性颈痛患者的颈椎动觉敏感性(CKS)受损:根据颈椎关节位置误差(JPEs)确定非特异性颈痛患者的亚组,并确定与所确定亚组相关的潜在因素:招募了 100 名患有非特异性颈部疼痛(病理解剖原因不明)的患者和 50 名对照组患者。使用激光笔测量颈椎伸展和旋转时的 JPEs。JPE以绝对误差(AE)、恒定误差(CE)和可变误差(VE)表示。临床特征包括疼痛强度、持续时间、残疾程度、疼痛侧、头晕、心理特征和活动范围。所有测试均在 1 天内完成。根据 AEs 进行了聚类分析。采用逻辑回归法确定与分组相关的因素:结果:分析结果将颈部疼痛患者分为两组:第一组,CKS受损程度较重(36 人);第二组,CKS受损程度较轻(64 人)。第 1 组的 AEs(所有颈椎运动)和 CE(左旋转)均大于第 2 组(P ≤ .002)。总体而言,第 1 组和第 2 组参与者的 AEs、CEs 和 VEs 均大于对照组(p ≤ .04)。头晕是与群组 1 相关的一个风险因素(OR=2.5,P = .04)。其他特征与群组无关(p ≥ .09):AEs确定了非特异性颈痛患者的两个亚组。结论:AEs 发现了两个非特异性颈部疼痛患者亚组,亚组 1 的患者 CKS 受损程度较高,亚组 2 的患者 CKS 受损程度较低。头晕是导致CKS受损程度加重的潜在风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A cluster analysis of cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in persons with nonspecific neck pain.

Introduction: Inter-individual variability may contribute to impaired cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility (CKS) in patients with nonspecific neck pain.

Objectives: To identify subgroups of participants with nonspecific neck pain based on cervical joint position errors (JPEs) and to determine potential factors associated with identified subgroups.

Methods: One hundred participants with nonspecific neck pain (unidentified pathoanatomical cause) and 50 controls were recruited. JPEs were measured in cervical extension and rotation, using a laser pointer. JPEs were expressed as absolute (AEs), constant (CEs), and variable (VEs) errors. Clinical characteristics were pain intensity, duration, disability, side of pain, dizziness, psychological features, and range of motion. All tests were performed within 1 day. A cluster analysis was conducted based on AEs. A logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the cluster groups.

Results: Analysis divided neck pain participants into two groups: cluster 1 with greater impaired CKS (n = 36) and cluster 2 with lesser impaired CKS (n = 64). The AEs (all cervical movements) and CE (left rotation) were larger in cluster 1 than 2 (p ≤ .002). Overall, participants in clusters 1 and 2 had larger AEs, CEs, and VEs than controls (p ≤ .04). The presence of dizziness was a risk factor associated with cluster 1 (OR=2.5, p = .04). The other characteristics were not associated with the cluster groups (p ≥ .09).

Conclusion: The AEs identified two subgroups of patients with nonspecific neck pain. Participants in subgroup 1 had greater impaired CKS, and participants in subgroup 2 had lesser impaired CKS. Dizziness was a potential risk factor associated with greater impaired CKS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of pain activity patterns, disability, body awareness, proprioception and function in individuals with and without lumbar spinal decompression surgery. Variation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presentation and outcomes based on phenotype and physical therapy movement system diagnosis: a case series. The prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors of pain in individuals with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Association between varus thrust and foot alignment and flexibility in knee osteoarthritis. Fear of movement interacts with trunk mobility, and pain intensity to predict disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1