利用“五个为什么”协议,在大学教育领导力硕士学位课程及其周边学区之间建立独特的合作伙伴关系。

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of formative design in learning Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s41686-023-00076-6
Maureen Ungarean, Krista Bixler, Keiana Desmore
{"title":"利用“五个为什么”协议,在大学教育领导力硕士学位课程及其周边学区之间建立独特的合作伙伴关系。","authors":"Maureen Ungarean,&nbsp;Krista Bixler,&nbsp;Keiana Desmore","doi":"10.1007/s41686-023-00076-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2019, program leaders and professors in the university's educational leadership program noticed a significant decline in enrollment, and state leadership test scores for the program were below the state average. Using the Five Whys protocol and five stages of the design thinking process as identified by IDEO (Brown & Katz, 2019), they set to resolve the issues. The Five Whys protocol is an iterative and formative interrogative technique used to explore cause-and-effect relationships. As noted by Serrat (2017), the primary goal of the technique is to determine the root cause of a problem by repeating the question up to five times. Each response informed the foundation for the next iteration and allowed the group to settle on the root cause of the problem. Then, design thinking was used to provide a solution-based approach to resolving the problems noted. Program leaders began by forming a stakeholder workgroup that included school district leadership development professionals from each of the university's surrounding districts. Program leaders used district leader input to understand what skills school districts needed in graduates of the university program and considered possible program changes to address the problems noted. The result of the year-long process was a program transformation, with increased enrollment and improved state assessment scores, to a widely accepted and successful master's degree program that is supported by all districts served by the university.</p>","PeriodicalId":73753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of formative design in learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forming a Unique Partnership Between a University's Educational Leadership Master's Degree Program and Its Surrounding School Districts Using the Five Whys Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Maureen Ungarean,&nbsp;Krista Bixler,&nbsp;Keiana Desmore\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41686-023-00076-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2019, program leaders and professors in the university's educational leadership program noticed a significant decline in enrollment, and state leadership test scores for the program were below the state average. Using the Five Whys protocol and five stages of the design thinking process as identified by IDEO (Brown & Katz, 2019), they set to resolve the issues. The Five Whys protocol is an iterative and formative interrogative technique used to explore cause-and-effect relationships. As noted by Serrat (2017), the primary goal of the technique is to determine the root cause of a problem by repeating the question up to five times. Each response informed the foundation for the next iteration and allowed the group to settle on the root cause of the problem. Then, design thinking was used to provide a solution-based approach to resolving the problems noted. Program leaders began by forming a stakeholder workgroup that included school district leadership development professionals from each of the university's surrounding districts. Program leaders used district leader input to understand what skills school districts needed in graduates of the university program and considered possible program changes to address the problems noted. The result of the year-long process was a program transformation, with increased enrollment and improved state assessment scores, to a widely accepted and successful master's degree program that is supported by all districts served by the university.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166041/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00076-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of formative design in learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00076-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,该大学教育领导力项目的项目负责人和教授注意到招生人数大幅下降,该项目的州领导力测试成绩低于州平均水平。使用IDEO确定的五个为什么协议和设计思维过程的五个阶段(Brown&Katz,2019),他们着手解决这些问题。五个为什么方案是一种反复的、形成性的疑问技巧,用于探索因果关系。正如Serrat(2017)所指出的,该技术的主要目标是通过重复问题最多五次来确定问题的根本原因。每个响应都通知了下一次迭代的基础,并允许团队解决问题的根本原因。然后,使用设计思维来提供一种基于解决方案的方法来解决所指出的问题。项目负责人首先成立了一个利益相关者工作组,其中包括来自大学周边每个地区的学区领导力发展专业人员。项目负责人利用学区负责人的意见来了解学区需要大学项目毕业生具备哪些技能,并考虑可能的项目变更以解决所指出的问题。这一长达一年的过程的结果是,随着入学人数的增加和州评估分数的提高,该项目转变为一个被广泛接受并获得成功的硕士学位项目,该项目得到了该大学服务的所有地区的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forming a Unique Partnership Between a University's Educational Leadership Master's Degree Program and Its Surrounding School Districts Using the Five Whys Protocol.

In 2019, program leaders and professors in the university's educational leadership program noticed a significant decline in enrollment, and state leadership test scores for the program were below the state average. Using the Five Whys protocol and five stages of the design thinking process as identified by IDEO (Brown & Katz, 2019), they set to resolve the issues. The Five Whys protocol is an iterative and formative interrogative technique used to explore cause-and-effect relationships. As noted by Serrat (2017), the primary goal of the technique is to determine the root cause of a problem by repeating the question up to five times. Each response informed the foundation for the next iteration and allowed the group to settle on the root cause of the problem. Then, design thinking was used to provide a solution-based approach to resolving the problems noted. Program leaders began by forming a stakeholder workgroup that included school district leadership development professionals from each of the university's surrounding districts. Program leaders used district leader input to understand what skills school districts needed in graduates of the university program and considered possible program changes to address the problems noted. The result of the year-long process was a program transformation, with increased enrollment and improved state assessment scores, to a widely accepted and successful master's degree program that is supported by all districts served by the university.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of QR Codes to Enhance Learning in a Graduate-Level Clinical Course Secondary School Teachers’ Use of Formative Assessment Practice to Create Co-regulated Learning Design, Development, and Formative Evaluation of a Hybrid Remote Quantum Laboratory Supporting HBCU Partnerships Correction: Faculty in Action: Researching a Community of Practice Approach to Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment How Do We Flip Our Language Classroom? Reassessing the Flipped Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1