舟月骨韧带损伤手术治疗后恢复运动或工作:系统回顾。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine British medical bulletin Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.1093/bmb/ldac026
Mei Yen Liew, Lewis A Dingle, Abi Semple, Philippa A Rust
{"title":"舟月骨韧带损伤手术治疗后恢复运动或工作:系统回顾。","authors":"Mei Yen Liew,&nbsp;Lewis A Dingle,&nbsp;Abi Semple,&nbsp;Philippa A Rust","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldac026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aims to compare the rate and time to return to sport or work following surgical interventions for isolated scapholunate ligament (SLL) injury.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, AMED, CINAHL Plus and SPORTDiscus was performed using keywords 'scapholunate', 'scapholunate ligament', 'scaphoid lunate', 'sport', 'sport injury', 'athlete', 'athletic performance', 'elite', 'return to sport', 'training', 'work', 'activity', 'return to activity'. Adult patients with isolated SLL injury, without osteoarthritis, were included.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Fourteen papers, including six different surgical interventions, met the criteria for the final analysis. All surgical techniques demonstrated acceptable rates of return to work or sport (>80%).</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The optimal surgical intervention for isolated SLL injury remains undetermined due to heterogeneity and limited sample sizes of published studies.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>This systematic review has provided clarification on the available literature on treatment modalities for isolated SLL injuries in the absence of osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Prospective, randomized, primary studies are needed to establish optimal treatment for acute isolated SLL injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"145 1","pages":"30-44"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to sport or work following surgical management of scapholunate ligament injury: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Mei Yen Liew,&nbsp;Lewis A Dingle,&nbsp;Abi Semple,&nbsp;Philippa A Rust\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bmb/ldac026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review aims to compare the rate and time to return to sport or work following surgical interventions for isolated scapholunate ligament (SLL) injury.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, AMED, CINAHL Plus and SPORTDiscus was performed using keywords 'scapholunate', 'scapholunate ligament', 'scaphoid lunate', 'sport', 'sport injury', 'athlete', 'athletic performance', 'elite', 'return to sport', 'training', 'work', 'activity', 'return to activity'. Adult patients with isolated SLL injury, without osteoarthritis, were included.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Fourteen papers, including six different surgical interventions, met the criteria for the final analysis. All surgical techniques demonstrated acceptable rates of return to work or sport (>80%).</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The optimal surgical intervention for isolated SLL injury remains undetermined due to heterogeneity and limited sample sizes of published studies.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>This systematic review has provided clarification on the available literature on treatment modalities for isolated SLL injuries in the absence of osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Prospective, randomized, primary studies are needed to establish optimal treatment for acute isolated SLL injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"30-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述旨在比较孤立性舟月骨韧带(SLL)损伤手术干预后恢复运动或工作的比率和时间。数据来源:使用关键词“舟月骨”、“舟月骨韧带”、“舟月骨”、“运动”、“运动损伤”、“运动员”、“运动表现”、“精英”、“重返运动”、“训练”、“工作”、“活动”、“重返活动”,对Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane、AMED、CINAHL Plus和SPORTDiscus进行了符合prisma标准的系统搜索。成人孤立性SLL损伤,无骨关节炎,纳入研究对象。一致领域:14篇论文,包括6种不同的手术干预,符合最终分析的标准。所有手术技术均显示恢复工作或运动的可接受率(>80%)。争议领域:由于已发表研究的异质性和样本量有限,孤立性SLL损伤的最佳手术干预仍未确定。成长要点:本系统综述澄清了无骨关节炎的孤立性SLL损伤的治疗方法的现有文献。及时开展研究的领域:需要前瞻性、随机、初步研究来确定急性孤立性SLL损伤的最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Return to sport or work following surgical management of scapholunate ligament injury: a systematic review.

Introduction: This systematic review aims to compare the rate and time to return to sport or work following surgical interventions for isolated scapholunate ligament (SLL) injury.

Sources of data: A PRISMA-compliant systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, AMED, CINAHL Plus and SPORTDiscus was performed using keywords 'scapholunate', 'scapholunate ligament', 'scaphoid lunate', 'sport', 'sport injury', 'athlete', 'athletic performance', 'elite', 'return to sport', 'training', 'work', 'activity', 'return to activity'. Adult patients with isolated SLL injury, without osteoarthritis, were included.

Areas of agreement: Fourteen papers, including six different surgical interventions, met the criteria for the final analysis. All surgical techniques demonstrated acceptable rates of return to work or sport (>80%).

Areas of controversy: The optimal surgical intervention for isolated SLL injury remains undetermined due to heterogeneity and limited sample sizes of published studies.

Growing points: This systematic review has provided clarification on the available literature on treatment modalities for isolated SLL injuries in the absence of osteoarthritis.

Areas timely for developing research: Prospective, randomized, primary studies are needed to establish optimal treatment for acute isolated SLL injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British medical bulletin
British medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries. Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.
期刊最新文献
Management of knee osteoarthritis using bone marrow aspirate concentrate: a systematic review. High-volume injections in Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review. Pediatric wrist fractures: variations in management across countries. An evidence-based summary of evidence. New developments in the diagnosis and management of motor neuron disease. Management of acute severe ulcerative colitis-an update for generalist and specialist clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1