{"title":"创伤内纵切口在幽门肌切开术治疗肥厚性幽门狭窄中的首次应用。","authors":"Keisuke Suzuki, Makoto Komura, Ryosuke Satake, Kan Terawaki, Tetsuro Kodaka, Takumi Gohara, Hironobu Yonekawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are several approaches to pyloromyotomy for the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis including open transumbilical pyloromyotomy and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Beginning in 2012, we adopted intraumbilical longitudinal incision as a new transumbilical approach for pyloromyotomy. We describe details of the operative technique and results of this new approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed records of patients undergoing transumbilical pyloromyotomy from 2005 to 2018. Perioperative outcomes were compared between intraumbilical longitudinal incision and supraumbilical incision, the latter of which is the conventional incision for transumbilical pyloromyotomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients underwent pyloromyotomy with intraumbilical longitudinal incision (intraumbilical group) and 28 patients with supraumbilical incision (supraumbilical group). The median operative time was longer in the intraumbilical group (58.0 vs. 43.5 min, p = 0.002). However, the time to full feeding did not differ significantly between the two groups, and the median postoperative stay was shorter in the intraumbilical group (3 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of complications (4.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 1.0). Scars after intraumbilical longitudinal incision were localized inside the umbilicus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pyloromyotomy can be performed through intraumbilical longitudinal incision as safely as supraumbilical incision and intraumbilical longitudinal incision may improve cosmetic results. This approach can be an alternative technique for pyloromyotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38819,"journal":{"name":"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine","volume":"48 2","pages":"67-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The First Application of Intraumbilical Longitudinal Incision to Pyloromyotomy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Keisuke Suzuki, Makoto Komura, Ryosuke Satake, Kan Terawaki, Tetsuro Kodaka, Takumi Gohara, Hironobu Yonekawa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are several approaches to pyloromyotomy for the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis including open transumbilical pyloromyotomy and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Beginning in 2012, we adopted intraumbilical longitudinal incision as a new transumbilical approach for pyloromyotomy. We describe details of the operative technique and results of this new approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed records of patients undergoing transumbilical pyloromyotomy from 2005 to 2018. Perioperative outcomes were compared between intraumbilical longitudinal incision and supraumbilical incision, the latter of which is the conventional incision for transumbilical pyloromyotomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients underwent pyloromyotomy with intraumbilical longitudinal incision (intraumbilical group) and 28 patients with supraumbilical incision (supraumbilical group). The median operative time was longer in the intraumbilical group (58.0 vs. 43.5 min, p = 0.002). However, the time to full feeding did not differ significantly between the two groups, and the median postoperative stay was shorter in the intraumbilical group (3 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of complications (4.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 1.0). Scars after intraumbilical longitudinal incision were localized inside the umbilicus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pyloromyotomy can be performed through intraumbilical longitudinal incision as safely as supraumbilical incision and intraumbilical longitudinal incision may improve cosmetic results. This approach can be an alternative technique for pyloromyotomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"67-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:幽门肌切开术治疗肥厚性幽门狭窄有开放经脐幽门肌切开术和腹腔镜幽门肌切开术。从2012年开始,我们采用创伤内纵切口作为幽门切开术的一种新的经脐入路。我们详细描述了这种新方法的手术技术和结果。方法:回顾2005年至2018年接受经脐幽门切开术的患者的记录。比较创伤内纵切口与脐上切口围手术期效果,脐上切口是经脐幽门肌切开术的常规切口。结果:经创伤内纵切口幽门肌切开术24例(创伤组),经脐上切口幽门肌切开术28例(脐上组)。创伤组的中位手术时间更长(58.0 vs. 43.5 min, p = 0.002)。然而,两组之间的完全喂养时间没有显著差异,创伤组的中位术后停留时间更短(3天对5.5天,p = 0.003)。两组的并发症发生率无差异(4.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 1.0)。创伤后纵切口瘢痕定位于脐内。结论:经创伤内纵切口行幽门肌切开术与经脐上切口行幽门肌切开术一样安全,且经创伤内纵切口可改善美容效果。这种方法可以作为幽门肌切开术的一种替代技术。
The First Application of Intraumbilical Longitudinal Incision to Pyloromyotomy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.
Objective: There are several approaches to pyloromyotomy for the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis including open transumbilical pyloromyotomy and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Beginning in 2012, we adopted intraumbilical longitudinal incision as a new transumbilical approach for pyloromyotomy. We describe details of the operative technique and results of this new approach.
Methods: We reviewed records of patients undergoing transumbilical pyloromyotomy from 2005 to 2018. Perioperative outcomes were compared between intraumbilical longitudinal incision and supraumbilical incision, the latter of which is the conventional incision for transumbilical pyloromyotomy.
Results: Twenty-four patients underwent pyloromyotomy with intraumbilical longitudinal incision (intraumbilical group) and 28 patients with supraumbilical incision (supraumbilical group). The median operative time was longer in the intraumbilical group (58.0 vs. 43.5 min, p = 0.002). However, the time to full feeding did not differ significantly between the two groups, and the median postoperative stay was shorter in the intraumbilical group (3 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of complications (4.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 1.0). Scars after intraumbilical longitudinal incision were localized inside the umbilicus.
Conclusion: Pyloromyotomy can be performed through intraumbilical longitudinal incision as safely as supraumbilical incision and intraumbilical longitudinal incision may improve cosmetic results. This approach can be an alternative technique for pyloromyotomy.
期刊介绍:
The Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, also referred to as Tokai Journal, is an official quarterly publication of the Tokai Medical Association. Tokai Journal publishes original articles that deal with issues of clinical, experimental, socioeconomic, cultural and/or historical importance to medical science and related fields. Manuscripts may be submitted as full-length Original Articles or Brief Communications. Tokai Journal also publishes reviews and symposium proceedings. Articles accepted for publication in Tokai Journal cannot be reproduced elsewhere without written permission from the Tokai Medical Association. In addition, Tokai Journal will not be held responsible for the opinions of the authors expressed in the published articles.