【Cellex治疗认知功能障碍伴慢性脑缺血患者的疗效和安全性——多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验结果】。

I A Shchukin, I A Koltsov, M S Fidler, V I Chubykin
{"title":"【Cellex治疗认知功能障碍伴慢性脑缺血患者的疗效和安全性——多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照临床试验结果】。","authors":"I A Shchukin,&nbsp;I A Koltsov,&nbsp;M S Fidler,&nbsp;V I Chubykin","doi":"10.17116/jnevro2023123051108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using Cellex for the treatment of cognitive impairment as part of the complex therapy of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia (CCI) compared with placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study randomized 300 patients with a reliable diagnosis of CCI stage 1-2, all participants were divided into two groups, 150 participants in each - main and control. The study drug Cellex or placebo was administered as two 10-day treatment courses, 1 ml once a day. The duration of the study was 90±5 days for each participant. The primary end point for evaluating the effectiveness of the therapy was the degree of improvement in the state of cognitive functions relative to the initial state according to the Montreal Cognitive Dysfunction Scale (MoCA) on the 31st and 60th days from the start of therapy in the compared groups. Secondary endpoints were the assessment of the degree of improvement in the state of cognitive functions according to psychometric testing scales (MoCA, Correction Test, Frontal Dysfunction Test Battery) relative to the initial state on the 31st, 60th and 90th days from the start of therapy. Also, a dynamic assessment of the systemic concentration of markers of brain damage - S100β, GFAP, MMP9 and neurotrophins - BDNF and GDNF was carried out. RESULTS The primary endpoint of the study was achieved-the MoCA score in each group increased uniformly after baseline. However, in the main group, this indicator was significantly higher starting from visit 3 - 23.4±2.8 points in the main group, in the placebo group 22.7±2.3 (p<0.001), a statistically significant difference also remained at visit 5 (p<0.001). When analyzing the secondary endpoints according to the battery of frontal dysfunction tests and the correction test, a more pronounced positive trend was also noted in the main group. Changes in the emotional sphere in both groups remained within the normal range. The dynamics of the systemic concentration of markers of brain damage and neurotrophins was multidirectional, the assessment of which was possible only at the trend level. CONCLUSION Based on the statistical analysis of the results of the study, Cellex was confirmed to be superior to Placebo in the degree of improvement in cognitive functions measured by the MoCA scale after the 1st and 2nd treatment courses.","PeriodicalId":24030,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Efficacy and safety of the drug Cellex for the treatment of patients with cognitive impairment with chronic cerebral ischemia - results of a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial].\",\"authors\":\"I A Shchukin,&nbsp;I A Koltsov,&nbsp;M S Fidler,&nbsp;V I Chubykin\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/jnevro2023123051108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using Cellex for the treatment of cognitive impairment as part of the complex therapy of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia (CCI) compared with placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study randomized 300 patients with a reliable diagnosis of CCI stage 1-2, all participants were divided into two groups, 150 participants in each - main and control. The study drug Cellex or placebo was administered as two 10-day treatment courses, 1 ml once a day. The duration of the study was 90±5 days for each participant. The primary end point for evaluating the effectiveness of the therapy was the degree of improvement in the state of cognitive functions relative to the initial state according to the Montreal Cognitive Dysfunction Scale (MoCA) on the 31st and 60th days from the start of therapy in the compared groups. Secondary endpoints were the assessment of the degree of improvement in the state of cognitive functions according to psychometric testing scales (MoCA, Correction Test, Frontal Dysfunction Test Battery) relative to the initial state on the 31st, 60th and 90th days from the start of therapy. Also, a dynamic assessment of the systemic concentration of markers of brain damage - S100β, GFAP, MMP9 and neurotrophins - BDNF and GDNF was carried out. RESULTS The primary endpoint of the study was achieved-the MoCA score in each group increased uniformly after baseline. However, in the main group, this indicator was significantly higher starting from visit 3 - 23.4±2.8 points in the main group, in the placebo group 22.7±2.3 (p<0.001), a statistically significant difference also remained at visit 5 (p<0.001). When analyzing the secondary endpoints according to the battery of frontal dysfunction tests and the correction test, a more pronounced positive trend was also noted in the main group. Changes in the emotional sphere in both groups remained within the normal range. The dynamics of the systemic concentration of markers of brain damage and neurotrophins was multidirectional, the assessment of which was possible only at the trend level. CONCLUSION Based on the statistical analysis of the results of the study, Cellex was confirmed to be superior to Placebo in the degree of improvement in cognitive functions measured by the MoCA scale after the 1st and 2nd treatment courses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":24030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2023123051108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2023123051108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与安慰剂比较,评价Cellex作为慢性脑缺血(CCI)患者综合治疗的一部分,治疗认知功能障碍的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:本研究随机选取300例诊断可靠的CCI 1-2期患者,将所有患者分为两组,各150例,主要组和对照组。研究药物Cellex或安慰剂分为两个10天疗程,每天1毫升。研究时间为90±5天。评价治疗效果的主要终点是比较组在治疗开始后第31天和第60天根据蒙特利尔认知功能障碍量表(MoCA)比较认知功能状态相对于初始状态的改善程度。次要终点是在治疗开始后第31天、第60天和第90天,根据心理测试量表(MoCA、校正测试、额叶功能障碍测试电池)评估认知功能状态相对于初始状态的改善程度。此外,还对脑损伤标志物S100β、GFAP、MMP9和神经营养因子BDNF和GDNF的全身浓度进行了动态评估。结果:达到了研究的主要终点,各组MoCA评分在基线后均匀升高。但在主组中,从就诊3开始,该指标明显高于主组(23.4±2.8)分,安慰剂组(22.7±2.3)分。结论:通过对研究结果的统计分析,证实Cellex在第1、2个疗程后MoCA量表测量的认知功能改善程度优于安慰剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Efficacy and safety of the drug Cellex for the treatment of patients with cognitive impairment with chronic cerebral ischemia - results of a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial].
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using Cellex for the treatment of cognitive impairment as part of the complex therapy of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia (CCI) compared with placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study randomized 300 patients with a reliable diagnosis of CCI stage 1-2, all participants were divided into two groups, 150 participants in each - main and control. The study drug Cellex or placebo was administered as two 10-day treatment courses, 1 ml once a day. The duration of the study was 90±5 days for each participant. The primary end point for evaluating the effectiveness of the therapy was the degree of improvement in the state of cognitive functions relative to the initial state according to the Montreal Cognitive Dysfunction Scale (MoCA) on the 31st and 60th days from the start of therapy in the compared groups. Secondary endpoints were the assessment of the degree of improvement in the state of cognitive functions according to psychometric testing scales (MoCA, Correction Test, Frontal Dysfunction Test Battery) relative to the initial state on the 31st, 60th and 90th days from the start of therapy. Also, a dynamic assessment of the systemic concentration of markers of brain damage - S100β, GFAP, MMP9 and neurotrophins - BDNF and GDNF was carried out. RESULTS The primary endpoint of the study was achieved-the MoCA score in each group increased uniformly after baseline. However, in the main group, this indicator was significantly higher starting from visit 3 - 23.4±2.8 points in the main group, in the placebo group 22.7±2.3 (p<0.001), a statistically significant difference also remained at visit 5 (p<0.001). When analyzing the secondary endpoints according to the battery of frontal dysfunction tests and the correction test, a more pronounced positive trend was also noted in the main group. Changes in the emotional sphere in both groups remained within the normal range. The dynamics of the systemic concentration of markers of brain damage and neurotrophins was multidirectional, the assessment of which was possible only at the trend level. CONCLUSION Based on the statistical analysis of the results of the study, Cellex was confirmed to be superior to Placebo in the degree of improvement in cognitive functions measured by the MoCA scale after the 1st and 2nd treatment courses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova
Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The impact of depression symptoms on postmorbid adaptation of patients who have undergone SARS-CoV-2 infection (assessment from the position of the multimorbidity model)]. [Differential diagnosis of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy after natalizumab withdrawal]. [The use of a fixed combination of diclofenac and orphenadrine in the treatment of acute pain syndrome in patients with discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy and lumboischialgia]. [Coherence of the electroencephalogram and peripheral markers of nerve tissue damage in depressive disorders]. [Study of the effect of Unifuzol on cognitive impairment and damage to the hippocampus and cerebral cortex during course administration to rats with bilateral stenosis of the common carotid arteries, causing chronic circulatory failure].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1