肩峰下疼痛综合征患者采用快速偏心收缩和静态拉伸的新型肩后拉伸疗法:随机试验

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1177/19417381231181127
Halime Ezgi Türksan, Sevgi Sevi Yeşilyaprak, Mehmet Erduran, Cem Özcan
{"title":"肩峰下疼痛综合征患者采用快速偏心收缩和静态拉伸的新型肩后拉伸疗法:随机试验","authors":"Halime Ezgi Türksan, Sevgi Sevi Yeşilyaprak, Mehmet Erduran, Cem Özcan","doi":"10.1177/19417381231181127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In subacromial pain syndrome (SPS), it is unknown whether posterior shoulder stretching exercises (PSSE) with rapid eccentric contraction, a muscle energy technique, improve clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes more than no stretching or static PSSE.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction is superior to no stretching and static PSSE in improving clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes in SPS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients with SPS and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit were randomized into the modified cross-body stretching with rapid eccentric contraction group (EMCBS; n = 24), static MCBS group (SMCBS; n = 23), or control group (CG; n = 23). In addition to 4-week physical therapy, EMCBS received PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction, SMCBS static PSSE, and CG no PSSE. The primary outcome was internal rotation range of motion (ROM). Secondary outcomes were posterior shoulder tightness, external rotation ROM (ERROM), pain, modified Constant-Murley score, short form of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), rotator cuff strength, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), supraspinatus tendon thickness, and supraspinatus tendon occupation ratio (STOR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shoulder mobility, pain, function and disability, strength, AHD, and STOR improved in all groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with SPS, PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction and static PSSE were superior to no stretching in improving clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes. Stretching with rapid eccentric contraction was not superior to static stretching, but improved ERROM compared with no stretching.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>In SPS, both PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction and static PSSE included in physical therapy program are beneficial to improve posterior shoulder mobility and other clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes. In the case of ERROM deficiency, rapid eccentric contraction might be preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11025518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Posterior Shoulder Stretching With Rapid Eccentric Contraction and Static Stretching in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Halime Ezgi Türksan, Sevgi Sevi Yeşilyaprak, Mehmet Erduran, Cem Özcan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381231181127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In subacromial pain syndrome (SPS), it is unknown whether posterior shoulder stretching exercises (PSSE) with rapid eccentric contraction, a muscle energy technique, improve clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes more than no stretching or static PSSE.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction is superior to no stretching and static PSSE in improving clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes in SPS.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients with SPS and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit were randomized into the modified cross-body stretching with rapid eccentric contraction group (EMCBS; n = 24), static MCBS group (SMCBS; n = 23), or control group (CG; n = 23). In addition to 4-week physical therapy, EMCBS received PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction, SMCBS static PSSE, and CG no PSSE. The primary outcome was internal rotation range of motion (ROM). Secondary outcomes were posterior shoulder tightness, external rotation ROM (ERROM), pain, modified Constant-Murley score, short form of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), rotator cuff strength, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), supraspinatus tendon thickness, and supraspinatus tendon occupation ratio (STOR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shoulder mobility, pain, function and disability, strength, AHD, and STOR improved in all groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with SPS, PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction and static PSSE were superior to no stretching in improving clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes. Stretching with rapid eccentric contraction was not superior to static stretching, but improved ERROM compared with no stretching.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>In SPS, both PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction and static PSSE included in physical therapy program are beneficial to improve posterior shoulder mobility and other clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes. In the case of ERROM deficiency, rapid eccentric contraction might be preferred.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11025518/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231181127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381231181127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在肩峰下疼痛综合征(SPS)中,快速偏心收缩肩后拉伸运动(PSSE)这种肌肉能量技术是否比不拉伸或静态PSSE更能改善临床和超声波检查结果,目前尚不清楚:研究设计:随机对照试验:随机对照试验:证据等级:1级:70名患有SPS和盂肱关节内旋功能障碍的患者被随机分为改良跨体伸展快速偏心收缩组(EMCBS;n = 24)、静态MCBS组(SMCBS;n = 23)或对照组(CG;n = 23)。除了为期4周的物理治疗外,EMCBS组接受快速偏心收缩PSSE,SMCBS组接受静态PSSE,CG组不接受PSSE。主要结果是内旋运动范围(ROM)。次要结果包括肩部后部紧绷感、外旋活动范围(ERROM)、疼痛、改良康斯坦茨-默利评分、手臂、肩部和手部残疾问卷简表(QuickDASH)、肩袖力量、肩峰距离(AHD)、冈上肌腱厚度和冈上肌腱占位比(STOR):结果:所有组的肩关节活动度、疼痛、功能和残疾、力量、肩峰距离和 STOR 均有所改善(P < 0.05):结论:对于 SPS 患者,快速偏心收缩的 PSSE 和静态 PSSE 在改善临床和超声波检查结果方面优于无拉伸。快速偏心收缩拉伸不优于静态拉伸,但与不拉伸相比,可改善ERROM:临床意义:对于SPS患者,理疗计划中包含的快速偏心收缩拉伸(PSSE)和静态拉伸(PSSE)都有助于改善肩关节后方的活动度以及其他临床和超声波检查结果。在ERROM缺乏的情况下,快速偏心收缩可能是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel Posterior Shoulder Stretching With Rapid Eccentric Contraction and Static Stretching in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Trial.

Background: In subacromial pain syndrome (SPS), it is unknown whether posterior shoulder stretching exercises (PSSE) with rapid eccentric contraction, a muscle energy technique, improve clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes more than no stretching or static PSSE.

Hypothesis: PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction is superior to no stretching and static PSSE in improving clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes in SPS.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial.

Level of evidence: Level 1.

Methods: Seventy patients with SPS and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit were randomized into the modified cross-body stretching with rapid eccentric contraction group (EMCBS; n = 24), static MCBS group (SMCBS; n = 23), or control group (CG; n = 23). In addition to 4-week physical therapy, EMCBS received PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction, SMCBS static PSSE, and CG no PSSE. The primary outcome was internal rotation range of motion (ROM). Secondary outcomes were posterior shoulder tightness, external rotation ROM (ERROM), pain, modified Constant-Murley score, short form of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), rotator cuff strength, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), supraspinatus tendon thickness, and supraspinatus tendon occupation ratio (STOR).

Results: Shoulder mobility, pain, function and disability, strength, AHD, and STOR improved in all groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: In patients with SPS, PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction and static PSSE were superior to no stretching in improving clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes. Stretching with rapid eccentric contraction was not superior to static stretching, but improved ERROM compared with no stretching.

Clinical relevance: In SPS, both PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction and static PSSE included in physical therapy program are beneficial to improve posterior shoulder mobility and other clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes. In the case of ERROM deficiency, rapid eccentric contraction might be preferred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Injury Prevention Program Using a Global Systems Approach on High-Risk Movement Mechanics for Noncontact ACL Injury. Medium- to Long-term Outcomes of Fasciotomy for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome: A 6-Year Mean Follow-up Study. A Risk Tool for Evaluating Overuse Injury and Return-to-Play Time Periods in Youth and Collegiate Athletes: Preliminary Study. Effect of the Stretch-Shortening Cycle on the Relationship Between Maximum Number of Repetitions and Lifting Velocity During the Prone Bench Pull. Mechanisms and Trends in Women's Lacrosse Head and Musculoskeletal Injuries: A 15-Year Review of National Injury Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1