育龄妇女阴道微生物群和促炎细胞因子水平的相关因素。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Beneficial microbes Pub Date : 2023-04-18 Epub Date: 2023-04-07 DOI:10.3920/BM2022.0060
J Novak, C S T Ferreira, M A Golim, M G Silva, C Marconi
{"title":"育龄妇女阴道微生物群和促炎细胞因子水平的相关因素。","authors":"J Novak, C S T Ferreira, M A Golim, M G Silva, C Marconi","doi":"10.3920/BM2022.0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the correlation between covariates of the vaginal microbiota and local levels of proinflammatory cytokines in women of reproductive age presenting four molecularly defined bacterial community-state types (CSTs). We enrolled 133 non-pregnant women who attended primary care health clinics for routine Pap-testing. Molecular profiling of vaginal microbiota was performed by V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing. The covariates of vaginal microbiota included were: vaginal pH, total bacterial cell count, diversity (Shannon index), -richness and dominant taxa abundances. Levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in supernatants of cervicovaginal fluids. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare microbiota covariates and cytokines among different CSTs. Spearman's tests were performed to assess correlations across the measured parameters. A total of 96 (72.2%) participants had CSTs dominated by <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp. (<i>Lactobacillus crispatus</i> CST I, n=38; <i>Lactobacillus gasseri</i> CST II, n=20; and <i>Lactobacillus iners</i> CST III, n=38). A total of 37 (27.8%) presented the <i>Lactobacillus-depleted</i> CST IV. Total bacterial count was higher in CST II (1.29E+05, 3.40E+04-6.69E+05) compared to other <i>Lactobacillus-dominated</i> CSTs (<i>p</i>=0.0003). The highest values of microbiota diversity (1.85; 0.23-2.68) and richness (27.0; 5.0-37.0) were observed in CST IV (<i>P</i><0.0001). Lower levels of IL-1β were observed in CST I (5.4; 0.0-3,256) when compared to CST III (51.7; 0.0-2,616) and to CST IV (56.2; 0.0-3,407) (<i>P</i>=0.008). Levels of IL-6 were higher in CST II (4.13; 0-131.4) than in CST IV (0.0-58.27) (<i>P</i>=0.02). Correlation tests showed an overall distinct profile of CST II when compared to other <i>Lactobacillusdominated</i> CSTs, particularly regarding the correlation between total bacterial load and cytokines (r>0.39). In conclusion, this study provides evidence of a single pro-inflammatory signature of <i>L. gasseri</i>-dominated microbiota in response to bacterial load. Further studies evaluating a broader range of inflammation markers are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8834,"journal":{"name":"Beneficial microbes","volume":"14 2","pages":"131-142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covariates of vaginal microbiota and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in women of reproductive age.\",\"authors\":\"J Novak, C S T Ferreira, M A Golim, M G Silva, C Marconi\",\"doi\":\"10.3920/BM2022.0060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the correlation between covariates of the vaginal microbiota and local levels of proinflammatory cytokines in women of reproductive age presenting four molecularly defined bacterial community-state types (CSTs). We enrolled 133 non-pregnant women who attended primary care health clinics for routine Pap-testing. Molecular profiling of vaginal microbiota was performed by V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing. The covariates of vaginal microbiota included were: vaginal pH, total bacterial cell count, diversity (Shannon index), -richness and dominant taxa abundances. Levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in supernatants of cervicovaginal fluids. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare microbiota covariates and cytokines among different CSTs. Spearman's tests were performed to assess correlations across the measured parameters. A total of 96 (72.2%) participants had CSTs dominated by <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp. (<i>Lactobacillus crispatus</i> CST I, n=38; <i>Lactobacillus gasseri</i> CST II, n=20; and <i>Lactobacillus iners</i> CST III, n=38). A total of 37 (27.8%) presented the <i>Lactobacillus-depleted</i> CST IV. Total bacterial count was higher in CST II (1.29E+05, 3.40E+04-6.69E+05) compared to other <i>Lactobacillus-dominated</i> CSTs (<i>p</i>=0.0003). The highest values of microbiota diversity (1.85; 0.23-2.68) and richness (27.0; 5.0-37.0) were observed in CST IV (<i>P</i><0.0001). Lower levels of IL-1β were observed in CST I (5.4; 0.0-3,256) when compared to CST III (51.7; 0.0-2,616) and to CST IV (56.2; 0.0-3,407) (<i>P</i>=0.008). Levels of IL-6 were higher in CST II (4.13; 0-131.4) than in CST IV (0.0-58.27) (<i>P</i>=0.02). Correlation tests showed an overall distinct profile of CST II when compared to other <i>Lactobacillusdominated</i> CSTs, particularly regarding the correlation between total bacterial load and cytokines (r>0.39). In conclusion, this study provides evidence of a single pro-inflammatory signature of <i>L. gasseri</i>-dominated microbiota in response to bacterial load. Further studies evaluating a broader range of inflammation markers are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beneficial microbes\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"131-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beneficial microbes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2022.0060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beneficial microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2022.0060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估出现四种分子定义的细菌群落状态类型(CST)的育龄妇女的阴道微生物群协变量与局部促炎细胞因子水平之间的相关性。我们招募了 133 名在初级保健诊所接受常规子宫颈抹片检查的非怀孕妇女。通过 V3-V4 16S rRNA 测序对阴道微生物群进行了分子分析。阴道微生物群的协变量包括:阴道 pH 值、细菌细胞总数、多样性(香农指数)、富集度和优势类群丰度。宫颈阴道液上清液中的白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、IL-8 和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)水平通过酶联免疫吸附试验进行了测定。非参数 Kruskal-Wallis 检验用于比较不同 CST 之间的微生物群协变量和细胞因子。斯皮尔曼检验用于评估各测量参数之间的相关性。共有 96 人(72.2%)的 CST 以乳酸杆菌属为主(脆片乳杆菌 CST I,38 人;加塞利乳杆菌 CST II,20 人;内氏乳杆菌 CST III,38 人)。共有 37 人(27.8%)出现了乳酸菌贫乏的 CST IV。与其他以乳酸杆菌为主的 CST 相比,CST II 的细菌总数更高(1.29E+05,3.40E+04-6.69E+05)(p=0.0003)。在 CST IV 中观察到微生物群多样性(1.85;0.23-2.68)和丰富度(27.0;5.0-37.0)的最高值(PP=0.008)。CST II 的 IL-6 水平(4.13;0-131.4)高于 CST IV(0.0-58.27)(P=0.02)。相关性测试表明,与其他以乳酸杆菌为主的 CST 相比,CST II 的整体特征更为明显,尤其是细菌总数与细胞因子之间的相关性(r>0.39)。总之,本研究提供的证据表明,以加塞利乳杆菌为主的微生物群在应对细菌负荷时具有单一的促炎特征。有必要对更广泛的炎症标志物进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covariates of vaginal microbiota and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in women of reproductive age.

This study aimed to assess the correlation between covariates of the vaginal microbiota and local levels of proinflammatory cytokines in women of reproductive age presenting four molecularly defined bacterial community-state types (CSTs). We enrolled 133 non-pregnant women who attended primary care health clinics for routine Pap-testing. Molecular profiling of vaginal microbiota was performed by V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing. The covariates of vaginal microbiota included were: vaginal pH, total bacterial cell count, diversity (Shannon index), -richness and dominant taxa abundances. Levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in supernatants of cervicovaginal fluids. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare microbiota covariates and cytokines among different CSTs. Spearman's tests were performed to assess correlations across the measured parameters. A total of 96 (72.2%) participants had CSTs dominated by Lactobacillus spp. (Lactobacillus crispatus CST I, n=38; Lactobacillus gasseri CST II, n=20; and Lactobacillus iners CST III, n=38). A total of 37 (27.8%) presented the Lactobacillus-depleted CST IV. Total bacterial count was higher in CST II (1.29E+05, 3.40E+04-6.69E+05) compared to other Lactobacillus-dominated CSTs (p=0.0003). The highest values of microbiota diversity (1.85; 0.23-2.68) and richness (27.0; 5.0-37.0) were observed in CST IV (P<0.0001). Lower levels of IL-1β were observed in CST I (5.4; 0.0-3,256) when compared to CST III (51.7; 0.0-2,616) and to CST IV (56.2; 0.0-3,407) (P=0.008). Levels of IL-6 were higher in CST II (4.13; 0-131.4) than in CST IV (0.0-58.27) (P=0.02). Correlation tests showed an overall distinct profile of CST II when compared to other Lactobacillusdominated CSTs, particularly regarding the correlation between total bacterial load and cytokines (r>0.39). In conclusion, this study provides evidence of a single pro-inflammatory signature of L. gasseri-dominated microbiota in response to bacterial load. Further studies evaluating a broader range of inflammation markers are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Beneficial microbes
Beneficial microbes MICROBIOLOGY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Beneficial Microbes is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: the promotion of the science of microbes beneficial to the health and wellbeing of man and animal. The journal contains original research papers and critical reviews in all areas dealing with beneficial microbes in both the small and large intestine, together with opinions, a calendar of forthcoming beneficial microbes-related events and book reviews. The journal takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues, including safety aspects of pro- & prebiotics, regulatory aspects, mechanisms of action, health benefits for the host, optimal production processes, screening methods, (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics, host and bacterial physiology, application, and role in health and disease in man and animal. Beneficial Microbes is intended to serve the needs of researchers and professionals from the scientific community and industry, as well as those of policy makers and regulators. The journal will have five major sections: * Food, nutrition and health * Animal nutrition * Processing and application * Regulatory & safety aspects * Medical & health applications In these sections, topics dealt with by Beneficial Microbes include: * Worldwide safety and regulatory issues * Human and animal nutrition and health effects * Latest discoveries in mechanistic studies and screening methods to unravel mode of action * Host physiology related to allergy, inflammation, obesity, etc. * Trends in application of (meta)genomics, proteomics and metabolomics * New developments in how processing optimizes pro- & prebiotics for application * Bacterial physiology related to health benefits
期刊最新文献
Aerobic bacterial group as an early-stage biomarker from faecal samples of patients with colorectal cancer without distant metastasis. Effects of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in neonates exposed to antibiotics: a randomised controlled trial. In vitro validation of colon delivery of vitamin B2 through a food grade multi-unit particle system. Oral supplementation of heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis strain EC-12 relieves gastrointestinal discomfort and alters the gut microecology in academically stressed students. Impact of two human milk oligosaccharides and lactose on the faecal microbiome of infants with probable cow's milk allergy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1