遥控麦克风在噪音和混响环境中为重听儿童带来的益处

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-28 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1755319
Dawna Lewis, Meredith Spratford, G Christopher Stecker, Ryan W McCreery
{"title":"遥控麦克风在噪音和混响环境中为重听儿童带来的益处","authors":"Dawna Lewis, Meredith Spratford, G Christopher Stecker, Ryan W McCreery","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1755319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Remote-microphone (RM) systems are designed to reduce the impact of poor acoustics on speech understanding. However, there is limited research examining the effects of adding reverberation to noise on speech understanding when using hearing aids (HAs) and RM systems. Given the significant challenges posed by environments with poor acoustics for children who are hard of hearing, we evaluated the ability of a novel RM system to address the effects of noise and reverberation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> We assessed the effect of a recently developed RM system on aided speech perception of children who were hard of hearing in noise and reverberation and how their performance compared to peers who are not hard of hearing (i.e., who have hearing thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL). The effect of aided speech audibility on sentence recognition when using an RM system also was assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Twenty-two children with mild to severe hearing loss and 17 children who were not hard of hearing (i.e., with hearing thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL) (7-18 years) participated.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> An adaptive procedure was used to determine the signal-to-noise ratio for 50 and 95% correct sentence recognition in noise and noise plus reverberation (RT 300 ms). Linear mixed models were used to examine the effect of listening conditions on speech recognition with RMs for both groups of children and the effects of aided audibility on performance across all listening conditions for children who were hard of hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Children who were hard of hearing had poorer speech recognition for HAs alone than for HAs plus RM. Regardless of hearing status, children had poorer speech recognition in noise plus reverberation than in noise alone. Children who were hard of hearing had poorer speech recognition than peers with thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL when using HAs alone but comparable or better speech recognition with HAs plus RM. Children with better-aided audibility with the HAs showed better speech recognition with the HAs alone and with HAs plus RM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Providing HAs that maximize speech audibility and coupling them with RM systems has the potential to improve communication access and outcomes for children who are hard of hearing in environments with noise and reverberation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote-Microphone Benefit in Noise and Reverberation for Children Who are Hard of Hearing.\",\"authors\":\"Dawna Lewis, Meredith Spratford, G Christopher Stecker, Ryan W McCreery\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1755319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Remote-microphone (RM) systems are designed to reduce the impact of poor acoustics on speech understanding. However, there is limited research examining the effects of adding reverberation to noise on speech understanding when using hearing aids (HAs) and RM systems. Given the significant challenges posed by environments with poor acoustics for children who are hard of hearing, we evaluated the ability of a novel RM system to address the effects of noise and reverberation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> We assessed the effect of a recently developed RM system on aided speech perception of children who were hard of hearing in noise and reverberation and how their performance compared to peers who are not hard of hearing (i.e., who have hearing thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL). The effect of aided speech audibility on sentence recognition when using an RM system also was assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Twenty-two children with mild to severe hearing loss and 17 children who were not hard of hearing (i.e., with hearing thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL) (7-18 years) participated.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> An adaptive procedure was used to determine the signal-to-noise ratio for 50 and 95% correct sentence recognition in noise and noise plus reverberation (RT 300 ms). Linear mixed models were used to examine the effect of listening conditions on speech recognition with RMs for both groups of children and the effects of aided audibility on performance across all listening conditions for children who were hard of hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Children who were hard of hearing had poorer speech recognition for HAs alone than for HAs plus RM. Regardless of hearing status, children had poorer speech recognition in noise plus reverberation than in noise alone. Children who were hard of hearing had poorer speech recognition than peers with thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL when using HAs alone but comparable or better speech recognition with HAs plus RM. Children with better-aided audibility with the HAs showed better speech recognition with the HAs alone and with HAs plus RM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Providing HAs that maximize speech audibility and coupling them with RM systems has the potential to improve communication access and outcomes for children who are hard of hearing in environments with noise and reverberation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300232/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755319\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程麦克风(RM)系统旨在减少不良声学环境对言语理解的影响。然而,在使用助听器(HA)和远程麦克风(RM)系统时,在噪音中加入混响对言语理解的影响的研究还很有限。目的:我们评估了最近开发的 RM 系统对重听儿童在噪音和混响环境下的辅助语音感知效果,以及他们与听力 "正常 "儿童的表现对比。研究还评估了使用 RM 系统时,辅助语音可听度对句子识别的影响:研究样本:22 名轻度至重度听力损失儿童和 17 名 "听力 "正常儿童(7-18 岁)参加:数据收集和分析:采用自适应程序来确定在噪声和噪声加混响(RT 300 毫秒)条件下,50% 和 95% 正确句子识别率的信噪比。与听力 "正常 "的儿童相比,线性混合模型用于研究听力条件对重听儿童使用RM进行语音识别的影响,以及辅助听力对重听儿童在所有听力条件下的表现的影响:结果:与听力正常的儿童相比,听力困难的儿童单独使用助听器的语音识别能力较差。无论听力状况如何,儿童在噪声加混响条件下的语音识别能力都比单独在噪声条件下差。与听力 "正常 "的儿童相比,重听儿童在单独使用助听器时的语音识别能力较差,但在使用助听器加 RM 时的语音识别能力相当或更好。使用助听器辅助听力较好的儿童在单独使用助听器和使用助听器加 RM 时的语音识别能力更强:结论:提供能最大限度提高语音可听性的助听器,并将其与 RM 系统结合使用,有可能改善有听力障碍的儿童在噪声和混响环境中的交流机会和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remote-Microphone Benefit in Noise and Reverberation for Children Who are Hard of Hearing.

Background:  Remote-microphone (RM) systems are designed to reduce the impact of poor acoustics on speech understanding. However, there is limited research examining the effects of adding reverberation to noise on speech understanding when using hearing aids (HAs) and RM systems. Given the significant challenges posed by environments with poor acoustics for children who are hard of hearing, we evaluated the ability of a novel RM system to address the effects of noise and reverberation.

Purpose:  We assessed the effect of a recently developed RM system on aided speech perception of children who were hard of hearing in noise and reverberation and how their performance compared to peers who are not hard of hearing (i.e., who have hearing thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL). The effect of aided speech audibility on sentence recognition when using an RM system also was assessed.

Study sample:  Twenty-two children with mild to severe hearing loss and 17 children who were not hard of hearing (i.e., with hearing thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL) (7-18 years) participated.

Data collection and analysis:  An adaptive procedure was used to determine the signal-to-noise ratio for 50 and 95% correct sentence recognition in noise and noise plus reverberation (RT 300 ms). Linear mixed models were used to examine the effect of listening conditions on speech recognition with RMs for both groups of children and the effects of aided audibility on performance across all listening conditions for children who were hard of hearing.

Results:  Children who were hard of hearing had poorer speech recognition for HAs alone than for HAs plus RM. Regardless of hearing status, children had poorer speech recognition in noise plus reverberation than in noise alone. Children who were hard of hearing had poorer speech recognition than peers with thresholds no greater than 15 dB HL when using HAs alone but comparable or better speech recognition with HAs plus RM. Children with better-aided audibility with the HAs showed better speech recognition with the HAs alone and with HAs plus RM.

Conclusion:  Providing HAs that maximize speech audibility and coupling them with RM systems has the potential to improve communication access and outcomes for children who are hard of hearing in environments with noise and reverberation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Location of Focal Traumatic Brain Injury and Canal Involved in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. The Effect of COVID-19 on the Efferent Auditory System in Adults. Increased Perception of Head Tilt to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Correlates to Motion Sickness Susceptibility in Vestibular Migraine. A Comparison of Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials via Audiometric and Nonaudiometric Bone Vibrators. Comparison of Multifrequency Narrow-Band CE-Chirp and Tone Burst Evoked Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1