搭桥术对成人缺血心肌的保护作用:Del Nido与St. Thomas血停搏。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00144
Xueqin Zhang, Yang Du, Anhui Wang
{"title":"搭桥术对成人缺血心肌的保护作用:Del Nido与St. Thomas血停搏。","authors":"Xueqin Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Du,&nbsp;Anhui Wang","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the myocardial protective efficacy of del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) with St. Thomas blood cardioplegia (SBC) in adult cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January to December 2021, all the patients who underwent elective cardiac operation were randomly divided into two cohorts based on the type of cardioplegia: DNC group and SBC group. Three categories of variables were compared: patient demographics, clinical variables, and laboratory variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 patients were enrolled in this study: DNC group, n = 65; and SBC group, n = 68. Except that the volume of cardioplegia administration were obvious less in the DNC group (P <0.01), no significant difference was found in the other postoperative clinical variables (P >0.05). No statistical significance was proved (P >0.05) in postoperative troponin I, creatine kinase, and B-type natriuretic peptide. The malondialdehyde concentration was higher in the SBC group, whether it is at 4 hours (P <0.05) or 24 hours (P >0.05) after operation. At the same two points in time, the change in superoxide dismutase activity was more significant in the SBC group (P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DNC cardioplegia was safe and effective on adult myocardium protection. The potential antioxidant stress effect in DNC may provide a direction for further improvement on the formula of cardioplegic solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":8037,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/72/c7/atcs-29-125.PMC10284662.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective Efficacy on Adult Ischemic Myocardium under Bypass: Del Nido vs. St. Thomas Blood Cardioplegia.\",\"authors\":\"Xueqin Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Du,&nbsp;Anhui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the myocardial protective efficacy of del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) with St. Thomas blood cardioplegia (SBC) in adult cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January to December 2021, all the patients who underwent elective cardiac operation were randomly divided into two cohorts based on the type of cardioplegia: DNC group and SBC group. Three categories of variables were compared: patient demographics, clinical variables, and laboratory variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 patients were enrolled in this study: DNC group, n = 65; and SBC group, n = 68. Except that the volume of cardioplegia administration were obvious less in the DNC group (P <0.01), no significant difference was found in the other postoperative clinical variables (P >0.05). No statistical significance was proved (P >0.05) in postoperative troponin I, creatine kinase, and B-type natriuretic peptide. The malondialdehyde concentration was higher in the SBC group, whether it is at 4 hours (P <0.05) or 24 hours (P >0.05) after operation. At the same two points in time, the change in superoxide dismutase activity was more significant in the SBC group (P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DNC cardioplegia was safe and effective on adult myocardium protection. The potential antioxidant stress effect in DNC may provide a direction for further improvement on the formula of cardioplegic solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/72/c7/atcs-29-125.PMC10284662.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较德尔尼多心脏停搏液(DNC)与圣托马斯血液停搏液(SBC)在成人心脏手术中的心肌保护作用。方法:2021年1 - 12月,将所有择期心脏手术患者根据心脏骤停类型随机分为两组:DNC组和SBC组。比较了三类变量:患者人口统计学、临床变量和实验室变量。结果:本研究共纳入133例患者:DNC组,n = 65;SBC组,n = 68。除DNC组给药量明显减少外(P < 0.05)。术后肌钙蛋白I、肌酸激酶、b型利钠肽差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05)。无论术后4 h, SBC组丙二醛浓度均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。在同一时间点,SBC组超氧化物歧化酶活性变化更为显著(P)。结论:DNC心脏截止剂对成人心肌保护是安全有效的。在DNC中潜在的抗氧化应激作用可能为进一步改进心脏麻痹液的配方提供方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protective Efficacy on Adult Ischemic Myocardium under Bypass: Del Nido vs. St. Thomas Blood Cardioplegia.

Purpose: To compare the myocardial protective efficacy of del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) with St. Thomas blood cardioplegia (SBC) in adult cardiac surgery.

Methods: From January to December 2021, all the patients who underwent elective cardiac operation were randomly divided into two cohorts based on the type of cardioplegia: DNC group and SBC group. Three categories of variables were compared: patient demographics, clinical variables, and laboratory variables.

Results: A total of 133 patients were enrolled in this study: DNC group, n = 65; and SBC group, n = 68. Except that the volume of cardioplegia administration were obvious less in the DNC group (P <0.01), no significant difference was found in the other postoperative clinical variables (P >0.05). No statistical significance was proved (P >0.05) in postoperative troponin I, creatine kinase, and B-type natriuretic peptide. The malondialdehyde concentration was higher in the SBC group, whether it is at 4 hours (P <0.05) or 24 hours (P >0.05) after operation. At the same two points in time, the change in superoxide dismutase activity was more significant in the SBC group (P <0.05).

Conclusion: The DNC cardioplegia was safe and effective on adult myocardium protection. The potential antioxidant stress effect in DNC may provide a direction for further improvement on the formula of cardioplegic solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Arterial Embolization and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Lung Resection for Anomalous Systemic Arterial Blood Supply to Normal Lung: Two Case Reports. Surgery for Ascending Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Valve Insufficiency in Conditions of Active Proceeding Syphilitic Aortitis and Valvulitis. Impact of Graft Velocity on Saphenous Vein Graft Atherosclerosis after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Surgery for Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax with Chronic Lung Diseases. Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1