{"title":"冠状动脉疾病和慢性阻塞性肺病患者的血运重建策略。","authors":"Matthew Brandorff, Julia Graham, Kirana Gudi","doi":"10.1007/s11936-023-00993-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This paper assesses recent literature on the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing revascularization. Specifically, to determine if there is an optimal revascularization strategy for this patient population, and if there are other modalities to assess the risks.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are limited new data in the last year addressing this clinical question. Recently there have been a series of studies which reinforced that COPD is a key independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after revascularization. There is no optimal revascularization strategy; however, there was a nonsignificant signal of potential benefit with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with short-term outcomes in the SYNTAXES trial. Currently, pulmonary function tests (PFT) are limited in clarifying risk assessments prior to revascularization, and there are investigations into the use of biomarkers to provide further insight into this increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>COPD is a key risk factor for poor outcomes in patients requiring revascularization. More investigations are needed to determine the optimum revascularization strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35912,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Brandorff, Julia Graham, Kirana Gudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11936-023-00993-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This paper assesses recent literature on the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing revascularization. Specifically, to determine if there is an optimal revascularization strategy for this patient population, and if there are other modalities to assess the risks.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>There are limited new data in the last year addressing this clinical question. Recently there have been a series of studies which reinforced that COPD is a key independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after revascularization. There is no optimal revascularization strategy; however, there was a nonsignificant signal of potential benefit with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with short-term outcomes in the SYNTAXES trial. Currently, pulmonary function tests (PFT) are limited in clarifying risk assessments prior to revascularization, and there are investigations into the use of biomarkers to provide further insight into this increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>COPD is a key risk factor for poor outcomes in patients requiring revascularization. More investigations are needed to determine the optimum revascularization strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-023-00993-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-023-00993-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.
Purpose of review: This paper assesses recent literature on the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing revascularization. Specifically, to determine if there is an optimal revascularization strategy for this patient population, and if there are other modalities to assess the risks.
Recent findings: There are limited new data in the last year addressing this clinical question. Recently there have been a series of studies which reinforced that COPD is a key independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after revascularization. There is no optimal revascularization strategy; however, there was a nonsignificant signal of potential benefit with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with short-term outcomes in the SYNTAXES trial. Currently, pulmonary function tests (PFT) are limited in clarifying risk assessments prior to revascularization, and there are investigations into the use of biomarkers to provide further insight into this increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with COPD.
Summary: COPD is a key risk factor for poor outcomes in patients requiring revascularization. More investigations are needed to determine the optimum revascularization strategy.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published treatment-related advances in cardiovascular medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to elucidate novel approaches to treatment in those affected by the spectrum of cardiovascular-related diseases and conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and stroke, heart failure, pediatric and congenital heart disease, and valvular, myocardial, pericardial, and cardiopulmonary diseases. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.