Mark D Sodders, Emma L Gause, Sara Bayer, Carol Metcalf, Kathleen Lumiere, Monica S Vavilala, Debra B Gordon
{"title":"电针治疗创伤中心急性疼痛科的疼痛疗效:回顾性观察研究","authors":"Mark D Sodders, Emma L Gause, Sara Bayer, Carol Metcalf, Kathleen Lumiere, Monica S Vavilala, Debra B Gordon","doi":"10.1089/acu.2022.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence for acupuncture to treat pain is growing. Electrostimulation of acupuncture needles (electroacupuncture) is common for pain and is thought to augment the therapeutic effect.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association of pain outcomes after a single acupuncture session with electrostimulation included (EA) compared with no electrostimulation included (NEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted using electronic health records of acupuncture sessions for adults with acute pain under the care of an acute pain service. Paired <i>t</i>-test and linear regression were used to report pain intensity changes after a single acupuncture session and by including EA. Ordered logistic regression was used to report categorical pain relief. Logistic regression was used to explore the odds of adding EA and the patient's age, gender, and pretreatment pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 24, 2017, through November 9, 2020, 465 acupuncture sessions recorded EA (<i>n</i> = 194), or NEA (<i>n</i> = 271). Acupuncture, independent of EA status, reduced pain intensity by a mean 2.5 points. EA was associated with a mean 0.38-point reduction in pain intensity more than NEA (confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.75 to -0.01). Among sessions reporting categorical pain relief (<i>n</i> = 415), higher relief was more likely with EA (odds ratio = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.52-3.08). There was no association between EA and the patient's age, gender, and pretreatment pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After a single acupuncture session, both EA and NEA reduced pain intensity. Higher categorical pain relief was reported with EA, though the clinical meaning is uncertain. Future research should focus on well-defined populations for electroacupuncture and factors for including electrostimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"35 3","pages":"135-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroacupuncture for Pain Outcomes in a Trauma Center's Acute Pain Service: A Retrospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mark D Sodders, Emma L Gause, Sara Bayer, Carol Metcalf, Kathleen Lumiere, Monica S Vavilala, Debra B Gordon\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/acu.2022.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence for acupuncture to treat pain is growing. Electrostimulation of acupuncture needles (electroacupuncture) is common for pain and is thought to augment the therapeutic effect.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association of pain outcomes after a single acupuncture session with electrostimulation included (EA) compared with no electrostimulation included (NEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted using electronic health records of acupuncture sessions for adults with acute pain under the care of an acute pain service. Paired <i>t</i>-test and linear regression were used to report pain intensity changes after a single acupuncture session and by including EA. Ordered logistic regression was used to report categorical pain relief. Logistic regression was used to explore the odds of adding EA and the patient's age, gender, and pretreatment pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 24, 2017, through November 9, 2020, 465 acupuncture sessions recorded EA (<i>n</i> = 194), or NEA (<i>n</i> = 271). Acupuncture, independent of EA status, reduced pain intensity by a mean 2.5 points. EA was associated with a mean 0.38-point reduction in pain intensity more than NEA (confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.75 to -0.01). Among sessions reporting categorical pain relief (<i>n</i> = 415), higher relief was more likely with EA (odds ratio = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.52-3.08). There was no association between EA and the patient's age, gender, and pretreatment pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After a single acupuncture session, both EA and NEA reduced pain intensity. Higher categorical pain relief was reported with EA, though the clinical meaning is uncertain. Future research should focus on well-defined populations for electroacupuncture and factors for including electrostimulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Acupuncture\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"135-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282799/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Acupuncture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2022.0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2022.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electroacupuncture for Pain Outcomes in a Trauma Center's Acute Pain Service: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Background: Evidence for acupuncture to treat pain is growing. Electrostimulation of acupuncture needles (electroacupuncture) is common for pain and is thought to augment the therapeutic effect.
Objectives: To examine the association of pain outcomes after a single acupuncture session with electrostimulation included (EA) compared with no electrostimulation included (NEA).
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using electronic health records of acupuncture sessions for adults with acute pain under the care of an acute pain service. Paired t-test and linear regression were used to report pain intensity changes after a single acupuncture session and by including EA. Ordered logistic regression was used to report categorical pain relief. Logistic regression was used to explore the odds of adding EA and the patient's age, gender, and pretreatment pain.
Results: From July 24, 2017, through November 9, 2020, 465 acupuncture sessions recorded EA (n = 194), or NEA (n = 271). Acupuncture, independent of EA status, reduced pain intensity by a mean 2.5 points. EA was associated with a mean 0.38-point reduction in pain intensity more than NEA (confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.75 to -0.01). Among sessions reporting categorical pain relief (n = 415), higher relief was more likely with EA (odds ratio = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.52-3.08). There was no association between EA and the patient's age, gender, and pretreatment pain intensity.
Conclusions: After a single acupuncture session, both EA and NEA reduced pain intensity. Higher categorical pain relief was reported with EA, though the clinical meaning is uncertain. Future research should focus on well-defined populations for electroacupuncture and factors for including electrostimulation.