首次基于野外对大黄蜂滞育存活率的估计表明,大黄蜂在野外的存活率很高。

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Insect Conservation Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8
Genevieve Pugesek, Jessie A Thuma, Elizabeth E Crone
{"title":"首次基于野外对大黄蜂滞育存活率的估计表明,大黄蜂在野外的存活率很高。","authors":"Genevieve Pugesek,&nbsp;Jessie A Thuma,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Crone","doi":"10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Bumblebee (<i>Bombus</i> spp.) queens overwintered in artificial settings tend to have low survival rates, raising concerns that diapause may be a particularly sensitive life cycle stage for this ecologically and economically valuable group of pollinators. However, it remains unclear whether lab-based estimates of diapause survival are comparable to survival rates of natural populations. In this study, we monitored the survival of <i>Bombus impatiens</i> queens overwintering in the field in Ipswich, MA, and conducted a meta-analysis of studies that estimate queen diapause survival in the lab to compare our field-based estimates of survival to those of lab-based studies. We found that queen <i>B. impatiens</i> had relatively high rates of overwintering survival after about six months (> 60%), especially when compared to estimates of six-month survival from lab studies (< 10%). We also observed a trend that broadly corroborates many lab studies of bumblebees, in that overwinter survival of queens was related to colony origin. In addition to providing the first estimate of diapause survival for bumblebee queens in nature, our study emphasizes the need to verify patterns observed in the lab to field-based studies.</p><p><strong>Implications for insect conservation: </strong>Although protecting target species during sensitive life cycle stages is a fundamental goal of conservation ecology, it is first necessary to identify at what stages of the life cycle populations are most vulnerable. Our results suggest that, at least in some study systems, diapause survival of queen bumblebees in the field may be higher than suggested by lab studies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":16240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insect Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First field-based estimates of bumblebee diapause survival rates showcase high survivorship in the wild.\",\"authors\":\"Genevieve Pugesek,&nbsp;Jessie A Thuma,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Crone\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Bumblebee (<i>Bombus</i> spp.) queens overwintered in artificial settings tend to have low survival rates, raising concerns that diapause may be a particularly sensitive life cycle stage for this ecologically and economically valuable group of pollinators. However, it remains unclear whether lab-based estimates of diapause survival are comparable to survival rates of natural populations. In this study, we monitored the survival of <i>Bombus impatiens</i> queens overwintering in the field in Ipswich, MA, and conducted a meta-analysis of studies that estimate queen diapause survival in the lab to compare our field-based estimates of survival to those of lab-based studies. We found that queen <i>B. impatiens</i> had relatively high rates of overwintering survival after about six months (> 60%), especially when compared to estimates of six-month survival from lab studies (< 10%). We also observed a trend that broadly corroborates many lab studies of bumblebees, in that overwinter survival of queens was related to colony origin. In addition to providing the first estimate of diapause survival for bumblebee queens in nature, our study emphasizes the need to verify patterns observed in the lab to field-based studies.</p><p><strong>Implications for insect conservation: </strong>Although protecting target species during sensitive life cycle stages is a fundamental goal of conservation ecology, it is first necessary to identify at what stages of the life cycle populations are most vulnerable. Our results suggest that, at least in some study systems, diapause survival of queen bumblebees in the field may be higher than suggested by lab studies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Insect Conservation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10164617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Insect Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insect Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在人工环境中越冬的大黄蜂(Bombus spp.)蜂王往往存活率较低,这引发了人们的担忧,即滞育可能是这群具有生态和经济价值的传粉昆虫特别敏感的生命周期阶段。然而,目前尚不清楚基于实验室的滞育存活率估计是否与自然种群的存活率相当。在这项研究中,我们监测了在马萨诸塞州伊普斯维奇野外越冬的凤仙花皇后的存活率,并对实验室中估计皇后滞育存活率的研究进行了荟萃分析,以将我们基于野外的存活率估计与基于实验室的研究进行比较。我们发现凤仙花皇后在大约六个月后具有相对较高的越冬存活率(> 60%),尤其是与实验室研究中对6个月生存率的估计相比(对昆虫保护的启示:尽管在敏感的生命周期阶段保护目标物种是保护生态学的一个基本目标,但首先有必要确定生命周期的哪个阶段种群最脆弱。我们的研究结果表明,至少在一些研究系统中,大黄蜂在野外的滞育存活率可能高于b研究。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First field-based estimates of bumblebee diapause survival rates showcase high survivorship in the wild.

Abstract: Bumblebee (Bombus spp.) queens overwintered in artificial settings tend to have low survival rates, raising concerns that diapause may be a particularly sensitive life cycle stage for this ecologically and economically valuable group of pollinators. However, it remains unclear whether lab-based estimates of diapause survival are comparable to survival rates of natural populations. In this study, we monitored the survival of Bombus impatiens queens overwintering in the field in Ipswich, MA, and conducted a meta-analysis of studies that estimate queen diapause survival in the lab to compare our field-based estimates of survival to those of lab-based studies. We found that queen B. impatiens had relatively high rates of overwintering survival after about six months (> 60%), especially when compared to estimates of six-month survival from lab studies (< 10%). We also observed a trend that broadly corroborates many lab studies of bumblebees, in that overwinter survival of queens was related to colony origin. In addition to providing the first estimate of diapause survival for bumblebee queens in nature, our study emphasizes the need to verify patterns observed in the lab to field-based studies.

Implications for insect conservation: Although protecting target species during sensitive life cycle stages is a fundamental goal of conservation ecology, it is first necessary to identify at what stages of the life cycle populations are most vulnerable. Our results suggest that, at least in some study systems, diapause survival of queen bumblebees in the field may be higher than suggested by lab studies.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10841-023-00478-8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Insect Conservation is an international journal devoted to the publication of articles concerned with the conservation of insects and related invertebrates. The Journal of Insect Conservation publishes papers on all aspects of conservation and biodiversity related to the insects and closely related groups such as Arachnids and Myriapods, including ecological work which has conservation implications. Research papers may address the subject at the community, population or species level, may cover aspects of behaviour, taxonomy or genetics, be theoretical or practical, and be local or global in nature. Review articles are welcome as well as points of view which are likely to stimulate debate. From time to time the journal will publish Special Issues on specific subject areas which are the focus of current research. Proposals for such issues are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Conserving apollo butterflies: habitat characteristics and conservation implications in Southwest Finland Spatio-temporal beta diversity of specialist and generalist aquatic insects in streams altered by mining activities in eastern Amazonia Ground-dwelling invertebrate community responses to bison and prescribed fire management in tallgrass prairies The role of citizens in conservation science: a case study with threatened Brazilian butterflies The history, science and preliminary results from the reintroduction of the Chequered Skipper, Carterocephalus palaemon into Rockingham Forest, England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1