{"title":"金属牙科修复体患者的磁共振成像检查:\"医学界的相关难题和牙医的作用\"。","authors":"Ritika Bhambhani, Santanu Sen Roy, Shubha Joshi","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_473_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interdisciplinary referrals for dental examination in hospital setups are common before radiotherapy, kidney transplants, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients who walk in could be random patients with metallic or porcelain-fused-to-metal prostheses done elsewhere but might require an opinion before the MRI. This leaves quite a responsibility on the consulting dentist to green signal the procedure. There is a lack of evidence in the literature, to confirm the absence of any untoward consequence during such MRI, which might leave the dentist in dilemma. Dental materials' magnetic behavior raises concern regarding whether they are 100% nonferromagnetic; furthermore, the examining dentist might be unaware of the metal used (Co-Cr, Ni-Cr, or trace elements). Clinicians may also come across full-mouth rehabilitated patients with multiple crown-bridge prostheses or metallic superstructure for implant prostheses. Research in the area leaves many unanswered questions because most studies have evaluated artifacts during MRI and are in vitro. Titanium is considered to be safe due to its paramagnetic behavior, whereas the literature does not rule out the probability of dislodgment of other porcelain fused to metal (PFM) prostheses. Due to less reported literature there exists dilemma to ascertain MRI in these patients. An online Google Search, PubMed, and gray literature portray the ambiguity associated with metal and PFM crowns and their magnetic behavior during MRI. Most studies were associated with the artifacts caused during MRI and methods of reducing them under in vitro situations. The concern for dislodgment has also been expressed in a few reports.</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>Certain steps of a pre-MRI checkup and an innovative technique have been discussed to assure patient safety during the MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The technique explained is inexpensive and a quick aid that can be executed before the investigation.</p><p><strong>Clinical and research implications: </strong>There is a need to study and understand the magnetic behavior of Co-Cr and Ni-Cr crowns in the presence of various MRI strengths.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"23 2","pages":"203-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging investigations in patients with metallic dental prosthesis: \\\"The associated dilemma for medical fraternity and the dentist's role\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Ritika Bhambhani, Santanu Sen Roy, Shubha Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jips.jips_473_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interdisciplinary referrals for dental examination in hospital setups are common before radiotherapy, kidney transplants, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients who walk in could be random patients with metallic or porcelain-fused-to-metal prostheses done elsewhere but might require an opinion before the MRI. This leaves quite a responsibility on the consulting dentist to green signal the procedure. There is a lack of evidence in the literature, to confirm the absence of any untoward consequence during such MRI, which might leave the dentist in dilemma. Dental materials' magnetic behavior raises concern regarding whether they are 100% nonferromagnetic; furthermore, the examining dentist might be unaware of the metal used (Co-Cr, Ni-Cr, or trace elements). Clinicians may also come across full-mouth rehabilitated patients with multiple crown-bridge prostheses or metallic superstructure for implant prostheses. Research in the area leaves many unanswered questions because most studies have evaluated artifacts during MRI and are in vitro. Titanium is considered to be safe due to its paramagnetic behavior, whereas the literature does not rule out the probability of dislodgment of other porcelain fused to metal (PFM) prostheses. Due to less reported literature there exists dilemma to ascertain MRI in these patients. An online Google Search, PubMed, and gray literature portray the ambiguity associated with metal and PFM crowns and their magnetic behavior during MRI. Most studies were associated with the artifacts caused during MRI and methods of reducing them under in vitro situations. The concern for dislodgment has also been expressed in a few reports.</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>Certain steps of a pre-MRI checkup and an innovative technique have been discussed to assure patient safety during the MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The technique explained is inexpensive and a quick aid that can be executed before the investigation.</p><p><strong>Clinical and research implications: </strong>There is a need to study and understand the magnetic behavior of Co-Cr and Ni-Cr crowns in the presence of various MRI strengths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"203-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262089/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_473_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_473_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Magnetic resonance imaging investigations in patients with metallic dental prosthesis: "The associated dilemma for medical fraternity and the dentist's role".
Background: Interdisciplinary referrals for dental examination in hospital setups are common before radiotherapy, kidney transplants, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients who walk in could be random patients with metallic or porcelain-fused-to-metal prostheses done elsewhere but might require an opinion before the MRI. This leaves quite a responsibility on the consulting dentist to green signal the procedure. There is a lack of evidence in the literature, to confirm the absence of any untoward consequence during such MRI, which might leave the dentist in dilemma. Dental materials' magnetic behavior raises concern regarding whether they are 100% nonferromagnetic; furthermore, the examining dentist might be unaware of the metal used (Co-Cr, Ni-Cr, or trace elements). Clinicians may also come across full-mouth rehabilitated patients with multiple crown-bridge prostheses or metallic superstructure for implant prostheses. Research in the area leaves many unanswered questions because most studies have evaluated artifacts during MRI and are in vitro. Titanium is considered to be safe due to its paramagnetic behavior, whereas the literature does not rule out the probability of dislodgment of other porcelain fused to metal (PFM) prostheses. Due to less reported literature there exists dilemma to ascertain MRI in these patients. An online Google Search, PubMed, and gray literature portray the ambiguity associated with metal and PFM crowns and their magnetic behavior during MRI. Most studies were associated with the artifacts caused during MRI and methods of reducing them under in vitro situations. The concern for dislodgment has also been expressed in a few reports.
Technique: Certain steps of a pre-MRI checkup and an innovative technique have been discussed to assure patient safety during the MRI.
Conclusion: The technique explained is inexpensive and a quick aid that can be executed before the investigation.
Clinical and research implications: There is a need to study and understand the magnetic behavior of Co-Cr and Ni-Cr crowns in the presence of various MRI strengths.