金属牙科修复体患者的磁共振成像检查:"医学界的相关难题和牙医的作用"。

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/jips.jips_473_22
Ritika Bhambhani, Santanu Sen Roy, Shubha Joshi
{"title":"金属牙科修复体患者的磁共振成像检查:\"医学界的相关难题和牙医的作用\"。","authors":"Ritika Bhambhani, Santanu Sen Roy, Shubha Joshi","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_473_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interdisciplinary referrals for dental examination in hospital setups are common before radiotherapy, kidney transplants, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients who walk in could be random patients with metallic or porcelain-fused-to-metal prostheses done elsewhere but might require an opinion before the MRI. This leaves quite a responsibility on the consulting dentist to green signal the procedure. There is a lack of evidence in the literature, to confirm the absence of any untoward consequence during such MRI, which might leave the dentist in dilemma. Dental materials' magnetic behavior raises concern regarding whether they are 100% nonferromagnetic; furthermore, the examining dentist might be unaware of the metal used (Co-Cr, Ni-Cr, or trace elements). Clinicians may also come across full-mouth rehabilitated patients with multiple crown-bridge prostheses or metallic superstructure for implant prostheses. Research in the area leaves many unanswered questions because most studies have evaluated artifacts during MRI and are in vitro. Titanium is considered to be safe due to its paramagnetic behavior, whereas the literature does not rule out the probability of dislodgment of other porcelain fused to metal (PFM) prostheses. Due to less reported literature there exists dilemma to ascertain MRI in these patients. An online Google Search, PubMed, and gray literature portray the ambiguity associated with metal and PFM crowns and their magnetic behavior during MRI. Most studies were associated with the artifacts caused during MRI and methods of reducing them under in vitro situations. The concern for dislodgment has also been expressed in a few reports.</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>Certain steps of a pre-MRI checkup and an innovative technique have been discussed to assure patient safety during the MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The technique explained is inexpensive and a quick aid that can be executed before the investigation.</p><p><strong>Clinical and research implications: </strong>There is a need to study and understand the magnetic behavior of Co-Cr and Ni-Cr crowns in the presence of various MRI strengths.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"23 2","pages":"203-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging investigations in patients with metallic dental prosthesis: \\\"The associated dilemma for medical fraternity and the dentist's role\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Ritika Bhambhani, Santanu Sen Roy, Shubha Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jips.jips_473_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interdisciplinary referrals for dental examination in hospital setups are common before radiotherapy, kidney transplants, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients who walk in could be random patients with metallic or porcelain-fused-to-metal prostheses done elsewhere but might require an opinion before the MRI. This leaves quite a responsibility on the consulting dentist to green signal the procedure. There is a lack of evidence in the literature, to confirm the absence of any untoward consequence during such MRI, which might leave the dentist in dilemma. Dental materials' magnetic behavior raises concern regarding whether they are 100% nonferromagnetic; furthermore, the examining dentist might be unaware of the metal used (Co-Cr, Ni-Cr, or trace elements). Clinicians may also come across full-mouth rehabilitated patients with multiple crown-bridge prostheses or metallic superstructure for implant prostheses. Research in the area leaves many unanswered questions because most studies have evaluated artifacts during MRI and are in vitro. Titanium is considered to be safe due to its paramagnetic behavior, whereas the literature does not rule out the probability of dislodgment of other porcelain fused to metal (PFM) prostheses. Due to less reported literature there exists dilemma to ascertain MRI in these patients. An online Google Search, PubMed, and gray literature portray the ambiguity associated with metal and PFM crowns and their magnetic behavior during MRI. Most studies were associated with the artifacts caused during MRI and methods of reducing them under in vitro situations. The concern for dislodgment has also been expressed in a few reports.</p><p><strong>Technique: </strong>Certain steps of a pre-MRI checkup and an innovative technique have been discussed to assure patient safety during the MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The technique explained is inexpensive and a quick aid that can be executed before the investigation.</p><p><strong>Clinical and research implications: </strong>There is a need to study and understand the magnetic behavior of Co-Cr and Ni-Cr crowns in the presence of various MRI strengths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"203-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10262089/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_473_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_473_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在放射治疗、肾移植或核磁共振成像(MRI)之前,跨学科转诊到医院进行牙科检查很常见。前来就诊的患者可能是在其他地方做了金属或瓷金属融合义齿修复的随机患者,但可能需要在核磁共振成像前听取他们的意见。这样一来,会诊牙医就有责任对手术发出绿色信号。文献中缺乏证据证实核磁共振成像不会产生任何不良后果,这可能会让牙医进退两难。牙科材料的磁性使人担心它们是否 100% 无铁磁性;此外,检查牙医可能不知道使用的金属(钴铬合金、镍铬合金或微量元素)。临床医生还可能遇到全口修复的患者,他们使用多个牙冠桥修复体或金属上部结构进行种植修复。该领域的研究留下了许多未解之谜,因为大多数研究都是对核磁共振成像过程中的伪影进行评估,而且都是体外研究。钛因其顺磁性而被认为是安全的,但文献并未排除其他瓷熔金属(PFM)修复体脱落的可能性。由于文献报道较少,在确定这些患者的核磁共振成像方面存在困境。在线谷歌搜索、PubMed 和灰色文献描述了与金属和 PFM 冠及其在核磁共振成像中的磁行为相关的模糊性。大多数研究都与核磁共振成像时产生的伪影以及在体外情况下减少伪影的方法有关。也有一些报告表达了对脱落的担忧:技术:讨论了核磁共振成像前检查的某些步骤和一种创新技术,以确保核磁共振成像期间的患者安全:结论:所解释的技术成本低廉,是一种可在检查前执行的快速辅助技术:临床和研究意义:有必要研究和了解钴铬合金和镍铬合金牙冠在不同磁共振成像强度下的磁行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Magnetic resonance imaging investigations in patients with metallic dental prosthesis: "The associated dilemma for medical fraternity and the dentist's role".

Background: Interdisciplinary referrals for dental examination in hospital setups are common before radiotherapy, kidney transplants, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients who walk in could be random patients with metallic or porcelain-fused-to-metal prostheses done elsewhere but might require an opinion before the MRI. This leaves quite a responsibility on the consulting dentist to green signal the procedure. There is a lack of evidence in the literature, to confirm the absence of any untoward consequence during such MRI, which might leave the dentist in dilemma. Dental materials' magnetic behavior raises concern regarding whether they are 100% nonferromagnetic; furthermore, the examining dentist might be unaware of the metal used (Co-Cr, Ni-Cr, or trace elements). Clinicians may also come across full-mouth rehabilitated patients with multiple crown-bridge prostheses or metallic superstructure for implant prostheses. Research in the area leaves many unanswered questions because most studies have evaluated artifacts during MRI and are in vitro. Titanium is considered to be safe due to its paramagnetic behavior, whereas the literature does not rule out the probability of dislodgment of other porcelain fused to metal (PFM) prostheses. Due to less reported literature there exists dilemma to ascertain MRI in these patients. An online Google Search, PubMed, and gray literature portray the ambiguity associated with metal and PFM crowns and their magnetic behavior during MRI. Most studies were associated with the artifacts caused during MRI and methods of reducing them under in vitro situations. The concern for dislodgment has also been expressed in a few reports.

Technique: Certain steps of a pre-MRI checkup and an innovative technique have been discussed to assure patient safety during the MRI.

Conclusion: The technique explained is inexpensive and a quick aid that can be executed before the investigation.

Clinical and research implications: There is a need to study and understand the magnetic behavior of Co-Cr and Ni-Cr crowns in the presence of various MRI strengths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A comparative evaluation of marginal fit and microleakage of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-milled zirconia and prefabricated posterior occlusal veneers: An in vitrostudy. An evaluation of antagonist enamel wear opposing full-coverage zirconia crowns versus other ceramics full-coverage crowns and natural enamel - An umbrella review. Evaluation of flexural strength and microhardness in Vaccinium macrocarpon (cranberry)-added self-cure polymethyl methacrylate dental resin: An in vitro study. Knowledge and awareness about temporomandibular disorder among dentists in India: Questionnaire study and review. Precise jaw relation recorder: An innovative device for prosthodontic rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1