小鼠(小家鼠)颏下采血的评价。

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000136
April J George, Brianne J Harmsen, James A Ford, Sambasiva R Tadepalli, Noel D Horton
{"title":"小鼠(小家鼠)颏下采血的评价。","authors":"April J George,&nbsp;Brianne J Harmsen,&nbsp;James A Ford,&nbsp;Sambasiva R Tadepalli,&nbsp;Noel D Horton","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The submental route is an option for nonterminal and serial blood collection in mice. This study compared the submental route to the maxillary route (also referred to as the submandibular route). The study used male CD1 and C57BL/6 strains of mice in 2 age groups: 8 and 19 wk. To simulate repeated toxicokinetic blood collection, blood was collected from each mouse at 1 and 24-h on Study Day 1, and at 1, 4 and 24 h on Study Day 16. Food consumption, body weights, and clinical observations were assessed daily. No apparent differences were found between the 2 blood collection sites in terms of either food consumption or body weight. Mice bled via the submental route showed fewer adverse clinical effects than did mice bled via the maxillary route. Clinical pathology showed no differences between the 2 methods. In addition, 7 trained technicians, who were inexperienced with the 2 bleeding methods prior to these evaluations, were surveyed to gain insights into expectations and overall experience of using the 2 routes. All 7 technicians preferred the submental route to the maxillary route. Furthermore, the average time needed to become proficient in submental blood collection (1.6 d) was less than that required to become proficient in maxillary blood collection (2.6 d). The qualitative aspects of this study, combined with fewer adverse clinical events, suggest ways to improve both animal and staff welfare. Our findings suggest that the submental route is safe, effective, and easier than the maxillary route for nonterminal serial blood collection in mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936856/pdf/jaalas2023000092.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Submental Blood Collection in Mice ( <i>Mus musculus</i>).\",\"authors\":\"April J George,&nbsp;Brianne J Harmsen,&nbsp;James A Ford,&nbsp;Sambasiva R Tadepalli,&nbsp;Noel D Horton\",\"doi\":\"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The submental route is an option for nonterminal and serial blood collection in mice. This study compared the submental route to the maxillary route (also referred to as the submandibular route). The study used male CD1 and C57BL/6 strains of mice in 2 age groups: 8 and 19 wk. To simulate repeated toxicokinetic blood collection, blood was collected from each mouse at 1 and 24-h on Study Day 1, and at 1, 4 and 24 h on Study Day 16. Food consumption, body weights, and clinical observations were assessed daily. No apparent differences were found between the 2 blood collection sites in terms of either food consumption or body weight. Mice bled via the submental route showed fewer adverse clinical effects than did mice bled via the maxillary route. Clinical pathology showed no differences between the 2 methods. In addition, 7 trained technicians, who were inexperienced with the 2 bleeding methods prior to these evaluations, were surveyed to gain insights into expectations and overall experience of using the 2 routes. All 7 technicians preferred the submental route to the maxillary route. Furthermore, the average time needed to become proficient in submental blood collection (1.6 d) was less than that required to become proficient in maxillary blood collection (2.6 d). The qualitative aspects of this study, combined with fewer adverse clinical events, suggest ways to improve both animal and staff welfare. Our findings suggest that the submental route is safe, effective, and easier than the maxillary route for nonterminal serial blood collection in mice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9936856/pdf/jaalas2023000092.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000136\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑下途径是小鼠非终末和连续血液采集的一种选择。本研究比较了颏下路径和上颌路径(也称为下颌下路径)。本研究使用雄性CD1和C57BL/6小鼠8和19周龄2个年龄组。为了模拟重复的毒代动力学采血,在研究第1天的1、24小时以及研究第16天的1、4、24小时采集每只小鼠的血液。每天评估食物消耗、体重和临床观察。两个采血点在食物消耗量和体重方面均无明显差异。经颏下途径出血的小鼠比经上颌途径出血的小鼠表现出更少的临床不良反应。两种方法的临床病理差异无统计学意义。此外,对7名经过培训的技术人员进行了调查,这些技术人员在评估之前对这两种出血方法没有经验,以了解使用这两种方法的期望和总体经验。7名技术人员均倾向于颏下路径而非上颌路径。此外,精通颏下采血所需的平均时间(1.6 d)少于精通上颌采血所需的平均时间(2.6 d)。本研究的定性方面,结合较少的不良临床事件,提出了改善动物和工作人员福利的方法。我们的研究结果表明,对于小鼠非终末连续采血,颏下途径比上颌途径安全、有效且更容易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Submental Blood Collection in Mice ( Mus musculus).

The submental route is an option for nonterminal and serial blood collection in mice. This study compared the submental route to the maxillary route (also referred to as the submandibular route). The study used male CD1 and C57BL/6 strains of mice in 2 age groups: 8 and 19 wk. To simulate repeated toxicokinetic blood collection, blood was collected from each mouse at 1 and 24-h on Study Day 1, and at 1, 4 and 24 h on Study Day 16. Food consumption, body weights, and clinical observations were assessed daily. No apparent differences were found between the 2 blood collection sites in terms of either food consumption or body weight. Mice bled via the submental route showed fewer adverse clinical effects than did mice bled via the maxillary route. Clinical pathology showed no differences between the 2 methods. In addition, 7 trained technicians, who were inexperienced with the 2 bleeding methods prior to these evaluations, were surveyed to gain insights into expectations and overall experience of using the 2 routes. All 7 technicians preferred the submental route to the maxillary route. Furthermore, the average time needed to become proficient in submental blood collection (1.6 d) was less than that required to become proficient in maxillary blood collection (2.6 d). The qualitative aspects of this study, combined with fewer adverse clinical events, suggest ways to improve both animal and staff welfare. Our findings suggest that the submental route is safe, effective, and easier than the maxillary route for nonterminal serial blood collection in mice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
35.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news. All signed articles, including refereed articles and book reviews, editorials, committee reports, and news and commentary, reflect the individual views of the authors and are not official views of AALAS. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Intranasal Administration of Polymeric Biodegradable Films in C57bl/6 Mice. Comparison of Systemic Extended-release Buprenorphine and Local Extended-release Bupivacaine-Meloxicam as Analgesics for Laparotomy in Mice. Equipment and Methods for Concurrently Housing Germfree and Gnotobiotic Mice in the Same Room. Evaluation of Rodent Diet Stability when Stored in Conditions that Diverge from Guide Parameters. Behavioral Evaluation of Laboratory-housed Ferrets (Mustela Putorius Furo) in Different Enclosure Sizes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1