阿曼旅行者到印度做脊柱手术时手术部位感染的审计

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100049
K. Venugopal Menon , Mansur Abdelmottaleb , Khalifa Al Ghafri , Renjit Kumar
{"title":"阿曼旅行者到印度做脊柱手术时手术部位感染的审计","authors":"K. Venugopal Menon ,&nbsp;Mansur Abdelmottaleb ,&nbsp;Khalifa Al Ghafri ,&nbsp;Renjit Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Many Omani nationals travel to India for Spine surgery. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in these patients is considered more than normal. The indications for surgery are also deemed liberal. Objective: To determine whether SSI rates are more in medical tourists.</p></div><div><h3>Materials &amp; Methods</h3><p>Design: The submission is a retrospective observational study done at a tertiary care referral hospital in Oman. The participants were a cohort of 125 patients who had travelled to India for spine surgery between January 2013 and December 2015. Their data was retrieved from the hospital information system. They were evaluated for satisfaction, residual complaints, surgical site infection and putative indications for surgery. The primary outcome measure was surgical site infection. The SSI rates were compared to a group of patients treated in-house during the same period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All the surgeries done were in the private sector. Fifty-four of the 80 cases were advised surgery locally as well, while 26 were advised against intervention. There were 15 cases of SSI, 10 of them needing re-operation. Four patients had neurological deterioration with 2 wrong level surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion &amp; Conclusions:</h3><p>The rate of SSI in medical tourism patients was 12% compared to the 2.7% native cases. There was a 78% chance of improvement when the surgery was locally approved and 74% chance of worsening when not approved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An audit of surgical site infections among Omani travelers to India for spinal surgery\",\"authors\":\"K. Venugopal Menon ,&nbsp;Mansur Abdelmottaleb ,&nbsp;Khalifa Al Ghafri ,&nbsp;Renjit Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Many Omani nationals travel to India for Spine surgery. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in these patients is considered more than normal. The indications for surgery are also deemed liberal. Objective: To determine whether SSI rates are more in medical tourists.</p></div><div><h3>Materials &amp; Methods</h3><p>Design: The submission is a retrospective observational study done at a tertiary care referral hospital in Oman. The participants were a cohort of 125 patients who had travelled to India for spine surgery between January 2013 and December 2015. Their data was retrieved from the hospital information system. They were evaluated for satisfaction, residual complaints, surgical site infection and putative indications for surgery. The primary outcome measure was surgical site infection. The SSI rates were compared to a group of patients treated in-house during the same period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All the surgeries done were in the private sector. Fifty-four of the 80 cases were advised surgery locally as well, while 26 were advised against intervention. There were 15 cases of SSI, 10 of them needing re-operation. Four patients had neurological deterioration with 2 wrong level surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion &amp; Conclusions:</h3><p>The rate of SSI in medical tourism patients was 12% compared to the 2.7% native cases. There was a 78% chance of improvement when the surgery was locally approved and 74% chance of worsening when not approved.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100049\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229621000204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229621000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多阿曼人前往印度做脊柱手术。这些患者的手术部位感染(SSI)率被认为高于正常水平。手术的适应症也被认为是自由的。目的:探讨医疗旅游者中SSI发生率是否较高。材料,方法设计:本研究是在阿曼一家三级转诊医院进行的回顾性观察性研究。参与者是一组125名患者,他们在2013年1月至2015年12月期间前往印度进行脊柱手术。他们的数据是从医院信息系统中检索的。评估他们的满意度、剩余投诉、手术部位感染和推测的手术指征。主要观察指标为手术部位感染。将SSI发生率与同一时期在医院内部治疗的一组患者进行比较。结果所有手术均在私营部门完成。在80宗个案中,54宗亦被建议进行局部手术,而26宗则被建议不进行干预。15例SSI,其中10例需要再次手术。4例患者神经功能恶化,2例手术水平错误。讨论,结论:医疗旅游患者SSI发生率为12%,而本地患者为2.7%。当手术得到当地批准时,有78%的机会得到改善,而当手术没有得到批准时,有74%的机会恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An audit of surgical site infections among Omani travelers to India for spinal surgery

Introduction

Many Omani nationals travel to India for Spine surgery. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in these patients is considered more than normal. The indications for surgery are also deemed liberal. Objective: To determine whether SSI rates are more in medical tourists.

Materials & Methods

Design: The submission is a retrospective observational study done at a tertiary care referral hospital in Oman. The participants were a cohort of 125 patients who had travelled to India for spine surgery between January 2013 and December 2015. Their data was retrieved from the hospital information system. They were evaluated for satisfaction, residual complaints, surgical site infection and putative indications for surgery. The primary outcome measure was surgical site infection. The SSI rates were compared to a group of patients treated in-house during the same period.

Results

All the surgeries done were in the private sector. Fifty-four of the 80 cases were advised surgery locally as well, while 26 were advised against intervention. There were 15 cases of SSI, 10 of them needing re-operation. Four patients had neurological deterioration with 2 wrong level surgeries.

Discussion & Conclusions:

The rate of SSI in medical tourism patients was 12% compared to the 2.7% native cases. There was a 78% chance of improvement when the surgery was locally approved and 74% chance of worsening when not approved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Closing the equity gap: A call for policy and programmatic reforms to ensure inclusive and effective HIV prevention, treatment and care for persons with disabilities in Eastern and Southern Africa Patient’s willingness to pay for improved community health insurance in Tanzania Improving antibiotic prescribing – Recommendations for funding and pricing policies to enhance use of point-of-care tests From theory to practice: Harmonizing taxonomies of trustworthy AI How firearm legislation impacts firearm mortality internationally: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1