Walter Antonio Campos-Ugaz, Jessica Paola Palacios Garay, Oriana Rivera-Lozada, Mitchell Alberto Alarcón Diaz, Doris Fuster-Guillén, Arístides Alfonso Tejada Arana
{"title":"使用机器学习方法诊断双相情感障碍的概述:临床机遇和挑战。","authors":"Walter Antonio Campos-Ugaz, Jessica Paola Palacios Garay, Oriana Rivera-Lozada, Mitchell Alberto Alarcón Diaz, Doris Fuster-Guillén, Arístides Alfonso Tejada Arana","doi":"10.18502/ijps.v18i2.12372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Automatic diagnosis of psychiatric disorders such as bipolar disorder (BD) through machine learning techniques has attracted substantial attention from psychiatric and artificial intelligence communities. These approaches mostly rely on various biomarkers extracted from electroencephalogram (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/functional MRI (fMRI) data. In this paper, we provide an updated overview of existing machine learning-based methods for bipolar disorder (BD) diagnosis using MRI and EEG data. <b>Method</b> <b>:</b> This study is a short non-systematic review with the aim of describing the current situation in automatic diagnosis of BD using machine learning methods. Therefore, an appropriate literature search was conducted via relevant keywords for original EEG/MRI studies on distinguishing BD from other conditions, particularly from healthy peers, in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. <b>Results:</b> We reviewed 26 studies, including 10 EEG studies and 16 MRI studies (including structural and functional MRI), that used traditional machine learning methods and deep learning algorithms to automatically detect BD. The reported accuracies for EEG studies is about 90%, while the reported accuracies for MRI studies remains below the minimum level for clinical relevance, i.e. about 80% of the classification outcome for traditional machine learning methods. However, deep learning techniques have generally achieved accuracies higher than 95%. <b>Conclusion:</b> Research utilizing machine learning applied to EEG signals and brain images has provided proof of concept for how this innovative technique can help psychiatrists distinguish BD patients from healthy people. However, the results have been somewhat contradictory and we must keep away from excessive optimistic interpretations of the findings. Much progress is still needed to reach the level of clinical practice in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":38866,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"18 2","pages":"237-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/fa/IJPS-18-237.PMC10293694.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Overview of Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Using Machine Learning Approaches: Clinical Opportunities and Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Walter Antonio Campos-Ugaz, Jessica Paola Palacios Garay, Oriana Rivera-Lozada, Mitchell Alberto Alarcón Diaz, Doris Fuster-Guillén, Arístides Alfonso Tejada Arana\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijps.v18i2.12372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Automatic diagnosis of psychiatric disorders such as bipolar disorder (BD) through machine learning techniques has attracted substantial attention from psychiatric and artificial intelligence communities. These approaches mostly rely on various biomarkers extracted from electroencephalogram (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/functional MRI (fMRI) data. In this paper, we provide an updated overview of existing machine learning-based methods for bipolar disorder (BD) diagnosis using MRI and EEG data. <b>Method</b> <b>:</b> This study is a short non-systematic review with the aim of describing the current situation in automatic diagnosis of BD using machine learning methods. Therefore, an appropriate literature search was conducted via relevant keywords for original EEG/MRI studies on distinguishing BD from other conditions, particularly from healthy peers, in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. <b>Results:</b> We reviewed 26 studies, including 10 EEG studies and 16 MRI studies (including structural and functional MRI), that used traditional machine learning methods and deep learning algorithms to automatically detect BD. The reported accuracies for EEG studies is about 90%, while the reported accuracies for MRI studies remains below the minimum level for clinical relevance, i.e. about 80% of the classification outcome for traditional machine learning methods. However, deep learning techniques have generally achieved accuracies higher than 95%. <b>Conclusion:</b> Research utilizing machine learning applied to EEG signals and brain images has provided proof of concept for how this innovative technique can help psychiatrists distinguish BD patients from healthy people. However, the results have been somewhat contradictory and we must keep away from excessive optimistic interpretations of the findings. Much progress is still needed to reach the level of clinical practice in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"237-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/fa/IJPS-18-237.PMC10293694.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v18i2.12372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v18i2.12372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:利用机器学习技术自动诊断双相情感障碍(BD)等精神障碍已经引起了精神病学和人工智能界的广泛关注。这些方法主要依赖于从脑电图(EEG)或磁共振成像(MRI)/功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据中提取的各种生物标志物。在本文中,我们提供了现有的基于机器学习的双相情感障碍(BD)诊断方法的最新概述,该方法使用MRI和EEG数据。方法:本研究是一篇简短的非系统综述,旨在描述利用机器学习方法自动诊断双相障碍的现状。因此,我们在PubMed、Web of Science和Google Scholar数据库中,通过相关关键词对区分双相障碍与其他疾病,特别是与健康同行的原始EEG/MRI研究进行了适当的文献检索。结果:我们回顾了26项研究,其中包括10项EEG研究和16项MRI研究(包括结构和功能MRI),这些研究使用传统的机器学习方法和深度学习算法自动检测BD。EEG研究报告的准确率约为90%,而MRI研究报告的准确率仍低于临床相关性的最低水平,即约为传统机器学习方法分类结果的80%。然而,深度学习技术通常达到95%以上的准确率。结论:将机器学习应用于脑电图信号和脑图像的研究为这种创新技术如何帮助精神科医生区分双相障碍患者和健康人提供了概念证明。然而,结果有些矛盾,我们必须避免对研究结果进行过度乐观的解释。在这一领域,要达到临床实践的水平,仍需取得很大进展。
An Overview of Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Using Machine Learning Approaches: Clinical Opportunities and Challenges.
Objective: Automatic diagnosis of psychiatric disorders such as bipolar disorder (BD) through machine learning techniques has attracted substantial attention from psychiatric and artificial intelligence communities. These approaches mostly rely on various biomarkers extracted from electroencephalogram (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/functional MRI (fMRI) data. In this paper, we provide an updated overview of existing machine learning-based methods for bipolar disorder (BD) diagnosis using MRI and EEG data. Method: This study is a short non-systematic review with the aim of describing the current situation in automatic diagnosis of BD using machine learning methods. Therefore, an appropriate literature search was conducted via relevant keywords for original EEG/MRI studies on distinguishing BD from other conditions, particularly from healthy peers, in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Results: We reviewed 26 studies, including 10 EEG studies and 16 MRI studies (including structural and functional MRI), that used traditional machine learning methods and deep learning algorithms to automatically detect BD. The reported accuracies for EEG studies is about 90%, while the reported accuracies for MRI studies remains below the minimum level for clinical relevance, i.e. about 80% of the classification outcome for traditional machine learning methods. However, deep learning techniques have generally achieved accuracies higher than 95%. Conclusion: Research utilizing machine learning applied to EEG signals and brain images has provided proof of concept for how this innovative technique can help psychiatrists distinguish BD patients from healthy people. However, the results have been somewhat contradictory and we must keep away from excessive optimistic interpretations of the findings. Much progress is still needed to reach the level of clinical practice in this field.