痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者在社会文化压力和应对模式背景下:性别差异的检验。

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Women & Aging Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1080/08952841.2022.2052705
Andrés Losada-Baltar, Carlos Vara-García, María Del Sequeros Pedroso-Chaparro, Isabel Cabrera, Lucia Jiménez-Gonzalo, José Fernandes-Pires, Cristina Huertas-Domingo, Samara Barrera-Caballero, Laura Gallego-Alberto, Rosa Romero-Moreno, María Márquez-González
{"title":"痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者在社会文化压力和应对模式背景下:性别差异的检验。","authors":"Andrés Losada-Baltar,&nbsp;Carlos Vara-García,&nbsp;María Del Sequeros Pedroso-Chaparro,&nbsp;Isabel Cabrera,&nbsp;Lucia Jiménez-Gonzalo,&nbsp;José Fernandes-Pires,&nbsp;Cristina Huertas-Domingo,&nbsp;Samara Barrera-Caballero,&nbsp;Laura Gallego-Alberto,&nbsp;Rosa Romero-Moreno,&nbsp;María Márquez-González","doi":"10.1080/08952841.2022.2052705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study assessed gender differences in the associations between familism dimensions, dysfunctional thoughts, and resource and outcome variables in 190 Spanish dementia family caregivers. A theoretical model was tested through path analysis, obtaining an excellent fit of the model to the data. Higher scores in the familial obligations dimension were associated with lower self-efficacy for self-care and obtaining respite and leisure frequency, and higher anxious and depressive feelings, in female caregivers only. Significant between-gender differences were obtained, suggesting that female caregivers holding strong familistic values are more vulnerable to the negative consequences of caregiving compared to male caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Women & Aging","volume":"35 4","pages":"354-368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family caregivers of people with dementia in the context of the sociocultural stress and coping model: An examination of gender differences.\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Losada-Baltar,&nbsp;Carlos Vara-García,&nbsp;María Del Sequeros Pedroso-Chaparro,&nbsp;Isabel Cabrera,&nbsp;Lucia Jiménez-Gonzalo,&nbsp;José Fernandes-Pires,&nbsp;Cristina Huertas-Domingo,&nbsp;Samara Barrera-Caballero,&nbsp;Laura Gallego-Alberto,&nbsp;Rosa Romero-Moreno,&nbsp;María Márquez-González\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08952841.2022.2052705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study assessed gender differences in the associations between familism dimensions, dysfunctional thoughts, and resource and outcome variables in 190 Spanish dementia family caregivers. A theoretical model was tested through path analysis, obtaining an excellent fit of the model to the data. Higher scores in the familial obligations dimension were associated with lower self-efficacy for self-care and obtaining respite and leisure frequency, and higher anxious and depressive feelings, in female caregivers only. Significant between-gender differences were obtained, suggesting that female caregivers holding strong familistic values are more vulnerable to the negative consequences of caregiving compared to male caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Women & Aging\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"354-368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Women & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2022.2052705\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Women & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2022.2052705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

该研究评估了190名西班牙痴呆症家庭照顾者在家庭主义维度、功能失调思想、资源和结果变量之间的关联的性别差异。通过通径分析对理论模型进行了检验,得到了模型与数据的良好拟合。家庭义务维度得分越高,女性照顾者在自我照顾、获得喘息和休闲频率方面的自我效能感越低,焦虑和抑郁情绪越高。性别差异显著,表明具有较强家庭价值观的女性照顾者比男性照顾者更容易受到照顾的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Family caregivers of people with dementia in the context of the sociocultural stress and coping model: An examination of gender differences.

The study assessed gender differences in the associations between familism dimensions, dysfunctional thoughts, and resource and outcome variables in 190 Spanish dementia family caregivers. A theoretical model was tested through path analysis, obtaining an excellent fit of the model to the data. Higher scores in the familial obligations dimension were associated with lower self-efficacy for self-care and obtaining respite and leisure frequency, and higher anxious and depressive feelings, in female caregivers only. Significant between-gender differences were obtained, suggesting that female caregivers holding strong familistic values are more vulnerable to the negative consequences of caregiving compared to male caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Aging women in Russia: Between sexless and sexy oldies. Are gender traits and stereotypes associated with stress and burnout among midlife women? "We can't allow ourselves to fall ill": Health and (self-)discipline in female family caregivers from a gender perspective. Mediating effect of social support on the relationship between social activity and depressive symptoms among older widows in Taiwan. Gray hair and pink slips: An analysis of Twitter responses to gendered ageism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1