Kanza Aziz, Noha A Sherif, Ryan S Meshkin, Alice C Lorch, Grayson W Armstrong
{"title":"眼科住院医师项目的远程医疗课程。","authors":"Kanza Aziz, Noha A Sherif, Ryan S Meshkin, Alice C Lorch, Grayson W Armstrong","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1743580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telemedicine in the field of ophthalmology. Despite the increasing utilization of telemedicine, there is a lack of formal training in ophthalmology residency programs to ensure ophthalmologists are prepared to conduct virtual eye exams. <b>Objective</b> This article aims to assess the impact of an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum on ophthalmology residents' self-reported knowledge acquisition in conducting telemedicine eye exams, perceived ability to diagnose, manage, and triage common eye diseases, and evaluate their attitudes toward the current and future use of teleophthalmology. <b>Methods</b> This single-center study at Massachusetts Eye and Ear used a nonvalidated pre- and postcurriculum survey conducted during the 2020 to 2021 academic year among ophthalmology residents. Participants engaged in an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum that consisted of interactive didactic lectures and electronic postdidactic assessments. <b>Results</b> Twenty-four residents (100%) completed a precurriculum survey, while 23 of 24 (95.8%) residents completed both the telemedicine curriculum and a postcurriculum survey. On a five-point Likert scale, the median interquartile range (IQR) scores for confidence with setup/logistics, history taking, examination, documentation, and education increased from 2.5 (2.0-4.0) to 4.0 (3.5-4.5) ( <i>p</i> = 0.001), 3.0 (3.0-4.0) to 5.0 (4.0-5.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), 2.0 (1.8-2.0) to 4.0 (3.5-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), 2.0 (1.0-2.0) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 2.5 (2.0-3.0) to 4.0 (4.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. The median (IQR) scores for comfort with ethics/professionalism, disparities and conducting patient triage, diagnosis, and management increased from 2.0 (2.0-2.3) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), 2.0 (2.0-2.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 3.0 (2.0-3.0) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> = 0.001), 2.0 (2.0-3.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 3.0 (2.0-3.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> = 0.008), respectively. <b>Conclusion</b> The implementation of an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum increased resident confidence and self-reported knowledge across all logistical and clinical components of virtual ophthalmic care. Formal telehealth curricula can address an unmet educational need of resident trainees in an era of rapid uptake and utilization of telehealth services.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 1","pages":"e93-e102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/75/10-1055-s-0042-1743580.PMC9927988.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine Curriculum in an Ophthalmology Residency Program.\",\"authors\":\"Kanza Aziz, Noha A Sherif, Ryan S Meshkin, Alice C Lorch, Grayson W Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1743580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telemedicine in the field of ophthalmology. Despite the increasing utilization of telemedicine, there is a lack of formal training in ophthalmology residency programs to ensure ophthalmologists are prepared to conduct virtual eye exams. <b>Objective</b> This article aims to assess the impact of an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum on ophthalmology residents' self-reported knowledge acquisition in conducting telemedicine eye exams, perceived ability to diagnose, manage, and triage common eye diseases, and evaluate their attitudes toward the current and future use of teleophthalmology. <b>Methods</b> This single-center study at Massachusetts Eye and Ear used a nonvalidated pre- and postcurriculum survey conducted during the 2020 to 2021 academic year among ophthalmology residents. Participants engaged in an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum that consisted of interactive didactic lectures and electronic postdidactic assessments. <b>Results</b> Twenty-four residents (100%) completed a precurriculum survey, while 23 of 24 (95.8%) residents completed both the telemedicine curriculum and a postcurriculum survey. On a five-point Likert scale, the median interquartile range (IQR) scores for confidence with setup/logistics, history taking, examination, documentation, and education increased from 2.5 (2.0-4.0) to 4.0 (3.5-4.5) ( <i>p</i> = 0.001), 3.0 (3.0-4.0) to 5.0 (4.0-5.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), 2.0 (1.8-2.0) to 4.0 (3.5-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), 2.0 (1.0-2.0) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 2.5 (2.0-3.0) to 4.0 (4.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. The median (IQR) scores for comfort with ethics/professionalism, disparities and conducting patient triage, diagnosis, and management increased from 2.0 (2.0-2.3) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), 2.0 (2.0-2.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 3.0 (2.0-3.0) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> = 0.001), 2.0 (2.0-3.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> < 0.001), and 3.0 (2.0-3.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( <i>p</i> = 0.008), respectively. <b>Conclusion</b> The implementation of an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum increased resident confidence and self-reported knowledge across all logistical and clinical components of virtual ophthalmic care. Formal telehealth curricula can address an unmet educational need of resident trainees in an era of rapid uptake and utilization of telehealth services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"e93-e102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/75/10-1055-s-0042-1743580.PMC9927988.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1743580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了眼科远程医疗的采用。尽管远程医疗的使用越来越多,但眼科住院医师项目缺乏正式的培训,以确保眼科医生做好进行虚拟眼科检查的准备。目的本研究旨在评估眼科远程医疗课程对眼科住院医师远程医疗眼科检查知识获取、常见眼病诊断、管理和分诊能力感知的影响,并评估他们对目前和未来使用远程眼科的态度。马萨诸塞州眼耳医学中心的这项单中心研究使用了一项未经验证的课程前和课程后调查,该调查在2020 - 2021学年期间对眼科住院医师进行。参与者参加了一个由互动式教学讲座和电子教学后评估组成的眼科远程医疗课程。结果24名住院医师(100%)完成了课程前调查,其中23名(95.8%)完成了远程医疗课程和课程后调查。在五点李克特量表上,设置/后勤、历史记录、考试、文件和教育方面的信心的中位数四分位数范围(IQR)得分分别从2.5(2.0-4.0)增加到4.0 (3.5-4.5)(p = 0.001), 3.0(3.0-4.0)增加到5.0 (4.0-5.0)(p p p p p p = 0.001), 2.0(2.0-3.0)增加到3.0 (3.0-4.0)(p p = 0.008)。结论眼科远程医疗课程的实施提高了住院医师的信心和对虚拟眼科护理所有后勤和临床组成部分的自我报告知识。在快速接受和利用远程保健服务的时代,正规的远程保健课程可以解决驻地受训人员未得到满足的教育需求。
Telemedicine Curriculum in an Ophthalmology Residency Program.
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telemedicine in the field of ophthalmology. Despite the increasing utilization of telemedicine, there is a lack of formal training in ophthalmology residency programs to ensure ophthalmologists are prepared to conduct virtual eye exams. Objective This article aims to assess the impact of an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum on ophthalmology residents' self-reported knowledge acquisition in conducting telemedicine eye exams, perceived ability to diagnose, manage, and triage common eye diseases, and evaluate their attitudes toward the current and future use of teleophthalmology. Methods This single-center study at Massachusetts Eye and Ear used a nonvalidated pre- and postcurriculum survey conducted during the 2020 to 2021 academic year among ophthalmology residents. Participants engaged in an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum that consisted of interactive didactic lectures and electronic postdidactic assessments. Results Twenty-four residents (100%) completed a precurriculum survey, while 23 of 24 (95.8%) residents completed both the telemedicine curriculum and a postcurriculum survey. On a five-point Likert scale, the median interquartile range (IQR) scores for confidence with setup/logistics, history taking, examination, documentation, and education increased from 2.5 (2.0-4.0) to 4.0 (3.5-4.5) ( p = 0.001), 3.0 (3.0-4.0) to 5.0 (4.0-5.0) ( p < 0.001), 2.0 (1.8-2.0) to 4.0 (3.5-4.0) ( p < 0.001), 2.0 (1.0-2.0) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( p < 0.001), and 2.5 (2.0-3.0) to 4.0 (4.0-4.0) ( p < 0.001), respectively. The median (IQR) scores for comfort with ethics/professionalism, disparities and conducting patient triage, diagnosis, and management increased from 2.0 (2.0-2.3) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( p < 0.001), 2.0 (2.0-2.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( p < 0.001) and 3.0 (2.0-3.0) to 4.0 (3.0-4.0) ( p = 0.001), 2.0 (2.0-3.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( p < 0.001), and 3.0 (2.0-3.0) to 3.0 (3.0-4.0) ( p = 0.008), respectively. Conclusion The implementation of an ophthalmic telemedicine curriculum increased resident confidence and self-reported knowledge across all logistical and clinical components of virtual ophthalmic care. Formal telehealth curricula can address an unmet educational need of resident trainees in an era of rapid uptake and utilization of telehealth services.