杜氏腱鞘炎手术后的再干预、PROMs 和影响 PROMs 的因素。

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2021-06-19 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1731105
Meryam Zamri, Jonathan Lans, Kyle R Eberlin, Rohit Garg, Jesse B Jupiter, Neal C Chen
{"title":"杜氏腱鞘炎手术后的再干预、PROMs 和影响 PROMs 的因素。","authors":"Meryam Zamri, Jonathan Lans, Kyle R Eberlin, Rohit Garg, Jesse B Jupiter, Neal C Chen","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  The aims of this study are to describe and identify the factors that influence patient reported outcomes following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. The secondary objective is to report the rate of reintervention following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. <b>Patients and Methods</b>  Outcomes using the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Patients Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI), and a custom de Quervain's questionnaire were obtained. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with patient-reported outcomes. <b>Results</b>  Seventy-six patients who underwent de Quervain's release participated. The average age was 52.8 years (95% confidence interval: 49.6-56.1) and median follow-up age was 7.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.3-12.0). Outcomes were: NRS of pain was 0 (IQR: 0.0-3.0), the median QuickDASH was 6.82 (IQR: 0.00-28.41), the median PRWE score was 4.0 (IQR: 0.00-18.50), and the median PROMIS PI score was 43.90 (IQR: 38.70-53.90). Eighteen (23.7%) of the patients reported pain with thumb activities, four of whom had a reintervention. Additionally, 21 (26.9%) patients reported decreased strength in the thumb compared to the contralateral side, of which two underwent a reintervention. In total, eight patients underwent reintervention of which seven had a second surgery and one had a cortisone injection. <b>Conclusion</b>  Roughly 1 in 20 patients following de Quervain's release undergoes reintervention. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report poor surgical outcomes more frequently. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report higher NRS pain scores ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05), higher QuickDASH scores ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05), and higher PRWE scores ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05). In practice, careful consideration of PROMIS PI scores and psychosocial factors are recommended before considering reintervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"15 3","pages":"165-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306984/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1731105.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reintervention, PROMs, and Factors Influencing PROMs Following Surgery for de Quervain's Tenosynovitis.\",\"authors\":\"Meryam Zamri, Jonathan Lans, Kyle R Eberlin, Rohit Garg, Jesse B Jupiter, Neal C Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1731105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  The aims of this study are to describe and identify the factors that influence patient reported outcomes following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. The secondary objective is to report the rate of reintervention following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. <b>Patients and Methods</b>  Outcomes using the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Patients Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI), and a custom de Quervain's questionnaire were obtained. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with patient-reported outcomes. <b>Results</b>  Seventy-six patients who underwent de Quervain's release participated. The average age was 52.8 years (95% confidence interval: 49.6-56.1) and median follow-up age was 7.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.3-12.0). Outcomes were: NRS of pain was 0 (IQR: 0.0-3.0), the median QuickDASH was 6.82 (IQR: 0.00-28.41), the median PRWE score was 4.0 (IQR: 0.00-18.50), and the median PROMIS PI score was 43.90 (IQR: 38.70-53.90). Eighteen (23.7%) of the patients reported pain with thumb activities, four of whom had a reintervention. Additionally, 21 (26.9%) patients reported decreased strength in the thumb compared to the contralateral side, of which two underwent a reintervention. In total, eight patients underwent reintervention of which seven had a second surgery and one had a cortisone injection. <b>Conclusion</b>  Roughly 1 in 20 patients following de Quervain's release undergoes reintervention. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report poor surgical outcomes more frequently. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report higher NRS pain scores ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05), higher QuickDASH scores ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05), and higher PRWE scores ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05). In practice, careful consideration of PROMIS PI scores and psychosocial factors are recommended before considering reintervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"165-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306984/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1731105.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在描述和确定影响患者在接受杜氏腱鞘炎手术后报告结果的因素。次要目的是报告手术治疗杜氏腱鞘炎后的再干预率。患者和方法 使用疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)、手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评分量表(QuickDASH)、患者评定腕部评估(PRWE)、患者报告结果测量信息系统疼痛干扰(PROMIS PI)和定制的杜氏腱鞘炎问卷调查结果。进行了多变量线性回归分析,以确定与患者报告结果相关的独立因素。结果 76 名患者接受了德-克万氏松解术。平均年龄为 52.8 岁(95% 置信区间:49.6-56.1),中位随访年龄为 7.0 岁(四分位数间距 [IQR]:4.3-12.0)。结果如下疼痛 NRS 为 0(IQR:0.0-3.0),QuickDASH 中位数为 6.82(IQR:0.00-28.41),PRWE 中位数为 4.0(IQR:0.00-18.50),PROMIS PI 中位数为 43.90(IQR:38.70-53.90)。有 18 名患者(23.7%)报告在拇指活动时感到疼痛,其中 4 人接受了再次干预。此外,21 名患者(26.9%)报告拇指力量比对侧减弱,其中两人接受了再次干预。共有八名患者接受了再次干预,其中七人进行了第二次手术,一人注射了可的松。结论 大约每 20 名德-克尔万氏松解术患者中就有 1 人接受再介入治疗。PROMIS PI评分高的患者更常出现手术效果不佳的情况。PROMIS PI评分高的患者NRS疼痛评分更高(p p p p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reintervention, PROMs, and Factors Influencing PROMs Following Surgery for de Quervain's Tenosynovitis.

Objective  The aims of this study are to describe and identify the factors that influence patient reported outcomes following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. The secondary objective is to report the rate of reintervention following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. Patients and Methods  Outcomes using the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Patients Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI), and a custom de Quervain's questionnaire were obtained. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with patient-reported outcomes. Results  Seventy-six patients who underwent de Quervain's release participated. The average age was 52.8 years (95% confidence interval: 49.6-56.1) and median follow-up age was 7.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.3-12.0). Outcomes were: NRS of pain was 0 (IQR: 0.0-3.0), the median QuickDASH was 6.82 (IQR: 0.00-28.41), the median PRWE score was 4.0 (IQR: 0.00-18.50), and the median PROMIS PI score was 43.90 (IQR: 38.70-53.90). Eighteen (23.7%) of the patients reported pain with thumb activities, four of whom had a reintervention. Additionally, 21 (26.9%) patients reported decreased strength in the thumb compared to the contralateral side, of which two underwent a reintervention. In total, eight patients underwent reintervention of which seven had a second surgery and one had a cortisone injection. Conclusion  Roughly 1 in 20 patients following de Quervain's release undergoes reintervention. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report poor surgical outcomes more frequently. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report higher NRS pain scores ( p  < 0.05), higher QuickDASH scores ( p  < 0.05), and higher PRWE scores ( p  < 0.05). In practice, careful consideration of PROMIS PI scores and psychosocial factors are recommended before considering reintervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The modified placenta model for microsurgery training: Recommended methods for comprehensive microsurgery experience. Ulnar shaft diameter as it relates to plate osteosynthesis: A cadaveric study. A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery. Diagnostic and management strategies for pseudoaneurysm of the ulnar artery: A scoping review. Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1