更好地理解非穆斯林初级保健临床医生和穆斯林患者:旨在减少穆斯林患者医疗保健不平等的文献综述

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2023-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100092
Jeffrey K King , Alexander Kieu , Marwan El-Deyarbi , Noof Aljneibi , Saif Al-Shamsi , Muhammad Jawad Hashim , Linda Östlundh , Kate Ellen King , Renee Houjintang King , Moien AB Khan , Romona Devi Govender
{"title":"更好地理解非穆斯林初级保健临床医生和穆斯林患者:旨在减少穆斯林患者医疗保健不平等的文献综述","authors":"Jeffrey K King ,&nbsp;Alexander Kieu ,&nbsp;Marwan El-Deyarbi ,&nbsp;Noof Aljneibi ,&nbsp;Saif Al-Shamsi ,&nbsp;Muhammad Jawad Hashim ,&nbsp;Linda Östlundh ,&nbsp;Kate Ellen King ,&nbsp;Renee Houjintang King ,&nbsp;Moien AB Khan ,&nbsp;Romona Devi Govender","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although Muslims are a growing population within many non-Muslim countries, there are insufficient Muslim clinicians to care for them. Studies have shown that non-Muslim clinicians have limited knowledge and understanding of Islamic practices affecting health, which may lead to disparities in the quality of healthcare delivery and outcomes when caring for Muslim patients. Muslims come from many different cultures and ethnicities and have variations in their beliefs and practices. This literature review provides some insights which may strengthen therapeutic bonds between non-Muslim clinicians and their Muslim patients resulting in improved holistic, patient-centered care in the areas of cancer screening, mental health, nutrition, and pharmacotherapy. Additionally, this review informs clinicians about the Islamic perspective on childbirth, end of life issues, travel for Islamic pilgrimage, and fasting during the month of Ramadan. Literature was sourced by a comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL along with hand screening of citations. Title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening excluded studies including less than 30% Muslim participants, protocols, or reporting results deemed irrelevant to primary care. 115 papers were selected for inclusion in the literature review. These were grouped into the themes of general spirituality, which were discussed in the Introduction, and Islam and health, Social etiquette, Cancer screening, Diet, Medications and their alternatives, Ramadan, Hajj, Mental health, Organ donation and transplants, and End of life. Summarizing the findings of the review, we conclude that health inequities affecting Muslim patients can be addressed at least in part by improved cultural competency in non-Muslim clinicians, as well as further research into this area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297732/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a better understanding between non-Muslim primary care clinicians and Muslim patients: A literature review intended to reduce health care inequities in Muslim patients\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey K King ,&nbsp;Alexander Kieu ,&nbsp;Marwan El-Deyarbi ,&nbsp;Noof Aljneibi ,&nbsp;Saif Al-Shamsi ,&nbsp;Muhammad Jawad Hashim ,&nbsp;Linda Östlundh ,&nbsp;Kate Ellen King ,&nbsp;Renee Houjintang King ,&nbsp;Moien AB Khan ,&nbsp;Romona Devi Govender\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although Muslims are a growing population within many non-Muslim countries, there are insufficient Muslim clinicians to care for them. Studies have shown that non-Muslim clinicians have limited knowledge and understanding of Islamic practices affecting health, which may lead to disparities in the quality of healthcare delivery and outcomes when caring for Muslim patients. Muslims come from many different cultures and ethnicities and have variations in their beliefs and practices. This literature review provides some insights which may strengthen therapeutic bonds between non-Muslim clinicians and their Muslim patients resulting in improved holistic, patient-centered care in the areas of cancer screening, mental health, nutrition, and pharmacotherapy. Additionally, this review informs clinicians about the Islamic perspective on childbirth, end of life issues, travel for Islamic pilgrimage, and fasting during the month of Ramadan. Literature was sourced by a comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL along with hand screening of citations. Title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening excluded studies including less than 30% Muslim participants, protocols, or reporting results deemed irrelevant to primary care. 115 papers were selected for inclusion in the literature review. These were grouped into the themes of general spirituality, which were discussed in the Introduction, and Islam and health, Social etiquette, Cancer screening, Diet, Medications and their alternatives, Ramadan, Hajj, Mental health, Organ donation and transplants, and End of life. Summarizing the findings of the review, we conclude that health inequities affecting Muslim patients can be addressed at least in part by improved cultural competency in non-Muslim clinicians, as well as further research into this area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10297732/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管在许多非穆斯林国家,穆斯林人口不断增长,但穆斯林临床医生却不足以照顾他们。研究表明,非穆斯林临床医生对影响健康的伊斯兰习俗的了解和理解有限,这可能导致在照顾穆斯林患者时,医疗服务的质量和结果存在差异。穆斯林来自许多不同的文化和种族,他们的信仰和习俗各不相同。这篇文献综述提供了一些见解,这些见解可能会加强非穆斯林临床医生与穆斯林患者之间的治疗联系,从而改善癌症筛查、心理健康、营养和药物治疗领域的整体、以患者为中心的护理。此外,这篇综述向临床医生介绍了伊斯兰教对分娩、临终问题、伊斯兰朝圣旅行和斋月禁食的看法。文献来源于PubMed、Scopus和CINAHL的全面搜索,以及对引文的手工筛选。标题和摘要筛选之后的全文筛选排除了研究,包括不到30%的穆斯林参与者、方案或报告结果,这些研究被认为与初级保健无关。选择115篇论文纳入文献综述。这些主题分为一般精神,在引言中进行了讨论,以及伊斯兰教与健康、社交礼仪、癌症筛查、饮食、药物及其替代品、斋月、朝觐、心理健康、器官捐赠和移植以及生命终结。总结审查结果,我们得出结论,影响穆斯林患者的健康不平等问题至少可以部分通过提高非穆斯林临床医生的文化能力以及对这一领域的进一步研究来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a better understanding between non-Muslim primary care clinicians and Muslim patients: A literature review intended to reduce health care inequities in Muslim patients

Although Muslims are a growing population within many non-Muslim countries, there are insufficient Muslim clinicians to care for them. Studies have shown that non-Muslim clinicians have limited knowledge and understanding of Islamic practices affecting health, which may lead to disparities in the quality of healthcare delivery and outcomes when caring for Muslim patients. Muslims come from many different cultures and ethnicities and have variations in their beliefs and practices. This literature review provides some insights which may strengthen therapeutic bonds between non-Muslim clinicians and their Muslim patients resulting in improved holistic, patient-centered care in the areas of cancer screening, mental health, nutrition, and pharmacotherapy. Additionally, this review informs clinicians about the Islamic perspective on childbirth, end of life issues, travel for Islamic pilgrimage, and fasting during the month of Ramadan. Literature was sourced by a comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL along with hand screening of citations. Title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening excluded studies including less than 30% Muslim participants, protocols, or reporting results deemed irrelevant to primary care. 115 papers were selected for inclusion in the literature review. These were grouped into the themes of general spirituality, which were discussed in the Introduction, and Islam and health, Social etiquette, Cancer screening, Diet, Medications and their alternatives, Ramadan, Hajj, Mental health, Organ donation and transplants, and End of life. Summarizing the findings of the review, we conclude that health inequities affecting Muslim patients can be addressed at least in part by improved cultural competency in non-Muslim clinicians, as well as further research into this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
The early market access vehicle - An innovative demand-driven model to catalyse introduction of new optimal health products in low- and middle-income countries. The cost of the reemergence of monkeypox: An overview of health financing in Africa Closing the equity gap: A call for policy and programmatic reforms to ensure inclusive and effective HIV prevention, treatment and care for persons with disabilities in Eastern and Southern Africa Patient’s willingness to pay for improved community health insurance in Tanzania Improving antibiotic prescribing – Recommendations for funding and pricing policies to enhance use of point-of-care tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1