美国眼科住院医师项目微创青光眼手术和其他青光眼手术经验调查。

Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) Pub Date : 2021-11-10 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1721072
Kevin M Halenda, Tae Jin Lee, Ashok Sharma, Amy J Estes, Kathryn E Bollinger
{"title":"美国眼科住院医师项目微创青光眼手术和其他青光眼手术经验调查。","authors":"Kevin M Halenda, Tae Jin Lee, Ashok Sharma, Amy J Estes, Kathryn E Bollinger","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1721072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  The aim of the study is to assess the state of glaucoma surgical training in United States ophthalmology residency programs, including experience with microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). <b>Design</b>  The design of the study is anonymous, internet-based national survey. <b>Participants</b>  Current United States ophthalmology residents of residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). <b>Methods</b>  An anonymous survey link was emailed to all 120 accredited United States ophthalmology residency programs inviting residents to participate in an assessment of residency glaucoma surgical experience. Survey responses were collected between January 21, 2019 and March 4, 2019 and analyzed using descriptive statistics. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>   The main outcomes of the study are demographic information, practice intentions, and anticipated primary surgical experience with ACGME-required glaucoma procedures and MIGS procedures, as self-reported by U.S. ophthalmology residents. <b>Results</b>  Of the estimated 1,479 U.S. ophthalmology residents, 161 residents participated (10.9%). A total of 118 residents (73.2%) reported any degree of anticipated MIGS primary surgical experience during residency, with the iStent being the most familiar technique. The likelihood of any anticipated MIGS experience during residency was not significantly different by geographic region ( <i>p</i>  = 0.16), however, anticipated volume varied significantly ( <i>p</i>  = 0.037). Of the 113 respondents who reported an intention to manage glaucoma surgically in their eventual practice, 25 (22.1%) reported no anticipated primary MIGS experience during residency. 73.3% of residents anticipating MIGS experience anticipated 0 to 10 cases, with 42.9% anticipating less than 5 cases as primary surgeon. <b>Conclusion</b>  MIGs are not a required component of the glaucoma surgical curriculum for U.S. ophthalmology residents. Although the majority of ophthalmology residents surveyed intend to manage glaucoma surgically in eventual practice, most receive minimal experience with these novel techniques during residency. Surgical training is variable by geographic region.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"13 2","pages":"e108-e113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dc/66/10-1055-s-0040-1721072.PMC9927992.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery and Other Glaucoma Surgical Experience among United States Ophthalmology Residency Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin M Halenda, Tae Jin Lee, Ashok Sharma, Amy J Estes, Kathryn E Bollinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0040-1721072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  The aim of the study is to assess the state of glaucoma surgical training in United States ophthalmology residency programs, including experience with microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). <b>Design</b>  The design of the study is anonymous, internet-based national survey. <b>Participants</b>  Current United States ophthalmology residents of residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). <b>Methods</b>  An anonymous survey link was emailed to all 120 accredited United States ophthalmology residency programs inviting residents to participate in an assessment of residency glaucoma surgical experience. Survey responses were collected between January 21, 2019 and March 4, 2019 and analyzed using descriptive statistics. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>   The main outcomes of the study are demographic information, practice intentions, and anticipated primary surgical experience with ACGME-required glaucoma procedures and MIGS procedures, as self-reported by U.S. ophthalmology residents. <b>Results</b>  Of the estimated 1,479 U.S. ophthalmology residents, 161 residents participated (10.9%). A total of 118 residents (73.2%) reported any degree of anticipated MIGS primary surgical experience during residency, with the iStent being the most familiar technique. The likelihood of any anticipated MIGS experience during residency was not significantly different by geographic region ( <i>p</i>  = 0.16), however, anticipated volume varied significantly ( <i>p</i>  = 0.037). Of the 113 respondents who reported an intention to manage glaucoma surgically in their eventual practice, 25 (22.1%) reported no anticipated primary MIGS experience during residency. 73.3% of residents anticipating MIGS experience anticipated 0 to 10 cases, with 42.9% anticipating less than 5 cases as primary surgeon. <b>Conclusion</b>  MIGs are not a required component of the glaucoma surgical curriculum for U.S. ophthalmology residents. Although the majority of ophthalmology residents surveyed intend to manage glaucoma surgically in eventual practice, most receive minimal experience with these novel techniques during residency. Surgical training is variable by geographic region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"e108-e113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dc/66/10-1055-s-0040-1721072.PMC9927992.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 该研究旨在评估美国眼科住院医师培训项目中青光眼手术培训的情况,包括微创青光眼手术(MIGS)的经验。设计 研究设计为匿名、基于互联网的全国性调查。参与者 目前美国眼科住院医师,其住院医师培训项目获得了美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会 (ACGME) 的认证。方法 通过电子邮件向美国所有 120 个获得认证的眼科住院医师培训项目发送匿名调查链接,邀请住院医师参与住院医师青光眼手术经验评估。调查回复于 2019 年 1 月 21 日至 2019 年 3 月 4 日期间收集,并使用描述性统计进行分析。主要结果测量 研究的主要结果是美国眼科住院医师自我报告的人口统计学信息、实习意向以及ACGME要求的青光眼手术和MIGS手术的预期主要手术经验。结果 在约 1,479 名美国眼科住院医师中,有 161 名住院医师(10.9%)参加了调查。共有 118 名住院医师(73.2%)表示在住院医师培训期间有任何程度的预期 MIGS 初级手术经验,其中 iStent 是他们最熟悉的技术。在住院医师培训期间预计会有任何 MIGS 经验的可能性因地理区域的不同而无显著差异(p = 0.16),但预计手术量却有显著差异(p = 0.037)。113 名受访者表示有意在最终实习中通过手术治疗青光眼,其中 25 人(22.1%)表示在实习期间没有预期的初级 MIGS 经验。73.3%的住院医师预计会有 0 到 10 例 MIGS 经验,42.9%的住院医师预计作为主刀医生会有少于 5 例 MIGS 经验。结论 MIG 并非美国眼科住院医师青光眼手术课程的必修课程。虽然大多数接受调查的眼科住院医师都打算在最终实践中通过手术治疗青光眼,但大多数人在住院医师培训期间对这些新技术的了解甚少。手术培训因地理区域而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survey of Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery and Other Glaucoma Surgical Experience among United States Ophthalmology Residency Programs.

Purpose  The aim of the study is to assess the state of glaucoma surgical training in United States ophthalmology residency programs, including experience with microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Design  The design of the study is anonymous, internet-based national survey. Participants  Current United States ophthalmology residents of residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Methods  An anonymous survey link was emailed to all 120 accredited United States ophthalmology residency programs inviting residents to participate in an assessment of residency glaucoma surgical experience. Survey responses were collected between January 21, 2019 and March 4, 2019 and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Main Outcome Measures   The main outcomes of the study are demographic information, practice intentions, and anticipated primary surgical experience with ACGME-required glaucoma procedures and MIGS procedures, as self-reported by U.S. ophthalmology residents. Results  Of the estimated 1,479 U.S. ophthalmology residents, 161 residents participated (10.9%). A total of 118 residents (73.2%) reported any degree of anticipated MIGS primary surgical experience during residency, with the iStent being the most familiar technique. The likelihood of any anticipated MIGS experience during residency was not significantly different by geographic region ( p  = 0.16), however, anticipated volume varied significantly ( p  = 0.037). Of the 113 respondents who reported an intention to manage glaucoma surgically in their eventual practice, 25 (22.1%) reported no anticipated primary MIGS experience during residency. 73.3% of residents anticipating MIGS experience anticipated 0 to 10 cases, with 42.9% anticipating less than 5 cases as primary surgeon. Conclusion  MIGs are not a required component of the glaucoma surgical curriculum for U.S. ophthalmology residents. Although the majority of ophthalmology residents surveyed intend to manage glaucoma surgically in eventual practice, most receive minimal experience with these novel techniques during residency. Surgical training is variable by geographic region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1