社交媒体对眼科住院医师项目申请人观点的影响

Sanket S Shah, Sravya Veligandla, Christopher Compton, Hasenin Al-Khersan, Jayanth Sridhar
{"title":"社交媒体对眼科住院医师项目申请人观点的影响","authors":"Sanket S Shah,&nbsp;Sravya Veligandla,&nbsp;Christopher Compton,&nbsp;Hasenin Al-Khersan,&nbsp;Jayanth Sridhar","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1756365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  This article evaluates the relevance of social media to ophthalmology residency applicants in the setting of virtual interviews, the types of information sought by applicants, and the impact of rebranding of an institutional and departmental social media account. <b>Design</b>  Cross-sectional survey. <b>Participants</b>  Ophthalmology residency applicants from the 2020 to 2021 cycle. <b>Methods</b>  A voluntary survey was emailed to 481 applicants to the University of Louisville Department of Ophthalmology residency during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle to gauge the impact of social media on their perspectives of residency programs, especially with regards to a new departmental social media account. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>  Applicants' use of social media platforms and specific components of departmental social media accounts found most useful. <b>Results</b>  The 13-question survey was completed by 84/481 applicants (17.5% response rate). Social media was used by 93% of respondents. Of those respondents reporting social media use, the most common platforms utilized included Instagram (85%), Facebook (83%), Twitter (41%), and LinkedIn (29%). Sixty-nine percent of respondents specifically used Instagram to learn more about residency programs. With regards to the rebranded Instagram account at the University of Louisville, 58% of respondents reported being influenced, with all asserting that the account positively encouraged them to apply to the program. The most informative elements of the account related to current resident profiles, resident life, and living in Louisville. <b>Conclusion</b>  A majority of responding ophthalmology residency applicants utilized social media to search for program information. A newly developed social media profile at a single institution positively influenced applicant impressions of the program, with the most importance assigned to information provided about current residents and typical resident life. These findings suggest key areas where programs should continue to dedicate online resources with targeted information to better recruit applicants.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 2","pages":"e224-e228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/78/10-1055-s-0042-1756365.PMC9927977.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Social Media on Applicant Perspectives of Ophthalmology Residency Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Sanket S Shah,&nbsp;Sravya Veligandla,&nbsp;Christopher Compton,&nbsp;Hasenin Al-Khersan,&nbsp;Jayanth Sridhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1756365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  This article evaluates the relevance of social media to ophthalmology residency applicants in the setting of virtual interviews, the types of information sought by applicants, and the impact of rebranding of an institutional and departmental social media account. <b>Design</b>  Cross-sectional survey. <b>Participants</b>  Ophthalmology residency applicants from the 2020 to 2021 cycle. <b>Methods</b>  A voluntary survey was emailed to 481 applicants to the University of Louisville Department of Ophthalmology residency during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle to gauge the impact of social media on their perspectives of residency programs, especially with regards to a new departmental social media account. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>  Applicants' use of social media platforms and specific components of departmental social media accounts found most useful. <b>Results</b>  The 13-question survey was completed by 84/481 applicants (17.5% response rate). Social media was used by 93% of respondents. Of those respondents reporting social media use, the most common platforms utilized included Instagram (85%), Facebook (83%), Twitter (41%), and LinkedIn (29%). Sixty-nine percent of respondents specifically used Instagram to learn more about residency programs. With regards to the rebranded Instagram account at the University of Louisville, 58% of respondents reported being influenced, with all asserting that the account positively encouraged them to apply to the program. The most informative elements of the account related to current resident profiles, resident life, and living in Louisville. <b>Conclusion</b>  A majority of responding ophthalmology residency applicants utilized social media to search for program information. A newly developed social media profile at a single institution positively influenced applicant impressions of the program, with the most importance assigned to information provided about current residents and typical resident life. These findings suggest key areas where programs should continue to dedicate online resources with targeted information to better recruit applicants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"e224-e228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/78/10-1055-s-0042-1756365.PMC9927977.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了在虚拟面试的背景下,社交媒体与眼科住院医师申请人的相关性,申请人寻求的信息类型,以及机构和部门社交媒体账户品牌重塑的影响。设计横断面调查。参与者为2020 - 2021周期的眼科住院医师申请者。方法通过电子邮件对路易斯维尔大学眼科住院医师2020年至2021年申请周期的481名申请人进行自愿调查,以评估社交媒体对他们对住院医师计划的看法的影响,特别是关于新的部门社交媒体账户。申请人使用社交媒体平台和部门社交媒体账户的具体组成部分是最有用的。结果共有84/481名申请者完成问卷调查,共13个问题,回复率为17.5%。93%的受访者使用社交媒体。在使用社交媒体的受访者中,最常用的平台包括Instagram(85%)、Facebook(83%)、Twitter(41%)和LinkedIn(29%)。69%的受访者专门使用Instagram来了解更多关于住院医师计划的信息。关于路易斯维尔大学(University of Louisville)重新命名的Instagram账户,58%的受访者表示受到了影响,所有人都声称该账户积极地鼓励了他们申请该项目。该帐户中信息最丰富的元素与当前居民的个人资料、居民生活和在路易斯维尔的生活有关。结论大多数眼科住院医师申请人使用社交媒体搜索项目信息。单个机构新开发的社交媒体档案对申请人对该计划的印象产生了积极影响,其中最重要的是提供有关当前居民和典型居民生活的信息。这些发现表明,在一些关键领域,项目应该继续投入在线资源,提供有针对性的信息,以更好地招募申请者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Social Media on Applicant Perspectives of Ophthalmology Residency Programs.

Purpose  This article evaluates the relevance of social media to ophthalmology residency applicants in the setting of virtual interviews, the types of information sought by applicants, and the impact of rebranding of an institutional and departmental social media account. Design  Cross-sectional survey. Participants  Ophthalmology residency applicants from the 2020 to 2021 cycle. Methods  A voluntary survey was emailed to 481 applicants to the University of Louisville Department of Ophthalmology residency during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle to gauge the impact of social media on their perspectives of residency programs, especially with regards to a new departmental social media account. Main Outcome Measures  Applicants' use of social media platforms and specific components of departmental social media accounts found most useful. Results  The 13-question survey was completed by 84/481 applicants (17.5% response rate). Social media was used by 93% of respondents. Of those respondents reporting social media use, the most common platforms utilized included Instagram (85%), Facebook (83%), Twitter (41%), and LinkedIn (29%). Sixty-nine percent of respondents specifically used Instagram to learn more about residency programs. With regards to the rebranded Instagram account at the University of Louisville, 58% of respondents reported being influenced, with all asserting that the account positively encouraged them to apply to the program. The most informative elements of the account related to current resident profiles, resident life, and living in Louisville. Conclusion  A majority of responding ophthalmology residency applicants utilized social media to search for program information. A newly developed social media profile at a single institution positively influenced applicant impressions of the program, with the most importance assigned to information provided about current residents and typical resident life. These findings suggest key areas where programs should continue to dedicate online resources with targeted information to better recruit applicants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1