过渡到夜间浮动系统在眼科住院医师:居民健康和表现的看法。

Sahil Aggarwal, C Ellis Wisely, Andrew Gross, Pratap Challa
{"title":"过渡到夜间浮动系统在眼科住院医师:居民健康和表现的看法。","authors":"Sahil Aggarwal,&nbsp;C Ellis Wisely,&nbsp;Andrew Gross,&nbsp;Pratap Challa","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1747969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  The purpose of this study is to characterize the influence of a new night float rotation on resident wellness and performance in the Duke University Eye Center Ophthalmology Residency Program. <b>Methods</b>  We analyzed three classes of ophthalmology residents: one class ( <i>n</i>  = 4) utilized the new night float rotation with no daytime clinical duties, while two senior classes ( <i>n</i>  = 12) utilized the traditional call system wherein they had daytime and nighttime responsibilities. Residents completed a questionnaire regarding their perceptions of the night float rotation. Supervising attendings ( <i>n</i>  = 15) were also surveyed about their perceptions of the new rotation. <b>Results</b>  Zero of the four residents on the night float rotation reported burnout compared with 6 of 11 residents in the traditional call system. Most residents supported the adoption of the night float rotation, but this trend was less apparent among fellows and attendings. Most respondents believed the new night float rotation reduced burnout, fatigue, and work hours while increasing time for nonclinical activities. Perceived skills gained while on call were felt to be similar between the two call systems. Fellows and attendings believed residents in the night float system performed similarly or better than residents in the traditional system in indicators such as knowledge and enthusiasm. There was no significant difference in the average number of patient encounters (290.8 ± 30.5 vs. 310.7 ± 25.4, <i>p</i>  = 0.163), phone encounters (430.8 ± 20.2 vs. 357.1 ± 90.0, <i>p</i>  = 0.068), or average hours worked per week (57.3 ± 4.6 vs. 58.0 ± 5.7 <i>p</i>  = 0.797) per resident between night float residents and traditional call residents. <b>Conclusions</b>  This study shows resident support for a night float rotation in ophthalmology residency at Duke, with reductions in burnout and more time for nonclinical activities without affecting perceived clinical performance. We hope this study serves as an impetus for other ophthalmology programs considering a transition to a night float system.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 1","pages":"e120-e126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/08/10-1055-s-0042-1747969.PMC9927979.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transition to a Night Float System in Ophthalmology Residency: Perceptions of Resident Wellness and Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Sahil Aggarwal,&nbsp;C Ellis Wisely,&nbsp;Andrew Gross,&nbsp;Pratap Challa\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1747969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  The purpose of this study is to characterize the influence of a new night float rotation on resident wellness and performance in the Duke University Eye Center Ophthalmology Residency Program. <b>Methods</b>  We analyzed three classes of ophthalmology residents: one class ( <i>n</i>  = 4) utilized the new night float rotation with no daytime clinical duties, while two senior classes ( <i>n</i>  = 12) utilized the traditional call system wherein they had daytime and nighttime responsibilities. Residents completed a questionnaire regarding their perceptions of the night float rotation. Supervising attendings ( <i>n</i>  = 15) were also surveyed about their perceptions of the new rotation. <b>Results</b>  Zero of the four residents on the night float rotation reported burnout compared with 6 of 11 residents in the traditional call system. Most residents supported the adoption of the night float rotation, but this trend was less apparent among fellows and attendings. Most respondents believed the new night float rotation reduced burnout, fatigue, and work hours while increasing time for nonclinical activities. Perceived skills gained while on call were felt to be similar between the two call systems. Fellows and attendings believed residents in the night float system performed similarly or better than residents in the traditional system in indicators such as knowledge and enthusiasm. There was no significant difference in the average number of patient encounters (290.8 ± 30.5 vs. 310.7 ± 25.4, <i>p</i>  = 0.163), phone encounters (430.8 ± 20.2 vs. 357.1 ± 90.0, <i>p</i>  = 0.068), or average hours worked per week (57.3 ± 4.6 vs. 58.0 ± 5.7 <i>p</i>  = 0.797) per resident between night float residents and traditional call residents. <b>Conclusions</b>  This study shows resident support for a night float rotation in ophthalmology residency at Duke, with reductions in burnout and more time for nonclinical activities without affecting perceived clinical performance. We hope this study serves as an impetus for other ophthalmology programs considering a transition to a night float system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"e120-e126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/08/10-1055-s-0042-1747969.PMC9927979.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1747969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1747969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究的目的是描述杜克大学眼科中心眼科住院医师项目中新的夜间浮动轮换对住院医师健康和表现的影响。方法我们分析了三个级别的眼科住院医师:一个级别(n = 4)使用新的夜间浮动轮转,没有白天的临床职责,而两个级别(n = 12)使用传统的呼叫系统,他们有白天和夜间的职责。居民们完成了一份关于他们对夜间花车旋转的看法的调查问卷。督导主治医生(n = 15)也被调查了他们对新轮转的看法。结果4名夜间浮动轮转的住院医生中0人报告倦怠,而传统呼叫系统的11名住院医生中有6人报告倦怠。大多数住院医生支持夜间花车轮换,但这种趋势在研究员和主治医生中不太明显。大多数受访者认为,新的夜间浮动轮转减少了倦怠,疲劳和工作时间,同时增加了非临床活动的时间。在两种呼叫系统中,在呼叫时获得的感知技能被认为是相似的。研究员和主治医生认为,在知识和热情等指标上,夜间浮动系统中的居民与传统系统中的居民表现相似或更好。夜间流动居民与传统电话居民的平均就诊次数(290.8±30.5比310.7±25.4,p = 0.163)、电话就诊次数(430.8±20.2比357.1±90.0,p = 0.068)、每周平均工作时间(57.3±4.6比58.0±5.7 p = 0.797)均无显著差异。结论:本研究表明,杜克大学眼科住院医师支持夜间浮动轮转,减少了倦怠,并有更多的时间进行非临床活动,而不影响临床表现。我们希望这项研究能成为其他眼科项目考虑过渡到夜间浮动系统的推动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transition to a Night Float System in Ophthalmology Residency: Perceptions of Resident Wellness and Performance.

Purpose  The purpose of this study is to characterize the influence of a new night float rotation on resident wellness and performance in the Duke University Eye Center Ophthalmology Residency Program. Methods  We analyzed three classes of ophthalmology residents: one class ( n  = 4) utilized the new night float rotation with no daytime clinical duties, while two senior classes ( n  = 12) utilized the traditional call system wherein they had daytime and nighttime responsibilities. Residents completed a questionnaire regarding their perceptions of the night float rotation. Supervising attendings ( n  = 15) were also surveyed about their perceptions of the new rotation. Results  Zero of the four residents on the night float rotation reported burnout compared with 6 of 11 residents in the traditional call system. Most residents supported the adoption of the night float rotation, but this trend was less apparent among fellows and attendings. Most respondents believed the new night float rotation reduced burnout, fatigue, and work hours while increasing time for nonclinical activities. Perceived skills gained while on call were felt to be similar between the two call systems. Fellows and attendings believed residents in the night float system performed similarly or better than residents in the traditional system in indicators such as knowledge and enthusiasm. There was no significant difference in the average number of patient encounters (290.8 ± 30.5 vs. 310.7 ± 25.4, p  = 0.163), phone encounters (430.8 ± 20.2 vs. 357.1 ± 90.0, p  = 0.068), or average hours worked per week (57.3 ± 4.6 vs. 58.0 ± 5.7 p  = 0.797) per resident between night float residents and traditional call residents. Conclusions  This study shows resident support for a night float rotation in ophthalmology residency at Duke, with reductions in burnout and more time for nonclinical activities without affecting perceived clinical performance. We hope this study serves as an impetus for other ophthalmology programs considering a transition to a night float system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1