Piotr Kanclerz, Carla Lanca, Szymon Adam Radomski, Michał Szymon Nowak
{"title":"非近视儿童的户外时间已减少到新冠肺炎大流行期间近视儿童的户外时间。","authors":"Piotr Kanclerz, Carla Lanca, Szymon Adam Radomski, Michał Szymon Nowak","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2023.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Low levels of outdoor activity are known to be an important risk factor for the development of myopia in schoolchildren. This study aimed to determine outdoor and near work patterns in Polish schoolchildren before and during school closure due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> All children undergoing a routine pediatric examination in the Elbląg branch of the Hygeia Clinic, together with their parents, were asked to fill an anonymous questionnaire. The subject's age, spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, time spent outdoors, screen time and total near work in hours per day before and during the pandemic, were recorded. As substantial differences in physical activity by time of year were reported, activity patterns for June (summer) and December (winter) were recorded. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the association between the presence of myopia and outdoor and total near work time at different timepoints. <b>Results:</b> A total of 61 schoolchildren aged 11.95 ± 2.74 (range 7 to 17) years were included in this study. The mean SE in the right eye was -1.78 ± 2.11 with 46% of the individuals (n=28) classified as myopic. Before the pandemic, higher time outdoors was associated with less myopic SE (OR=0.47, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.24 to 0.93). During the pandemic, time outdoors among non-myopic children was similar to myopic children, both during winter and summer months (2.18 ± 1.81 vs. 1.89 ± 1.50; <i>P</i>=.51, and 3.47 ± 2.66 vs. 3.31 ± 1.65; <i>P</i>=.79 respectively). Time outdoors was not significantly associated with myopia during the pandemic (OR=1.17, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.14). Total near work was not associated with myopia at any time point. <b>Conclusion:</b> The long-term influence of the changing patterns of outdoor and near work on myopia prevalence and progression in our population is still to be established. Nevertheless, it is likely that the decrease of outdoor time may influence the rates of myopia in this region.</p>","PeriodicalId":21385,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"67 1","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The outdoor time in non-myopic children has decreased to that of myopic children during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Kanclerz, Carla Lanca, Szymon Adam Radomski, Michał Szymon Nowak\",\"doi\":\"10.22336/rjo.2023.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Low levels of outdoor activity are known to be an important risk factor for the development of myopia in schoolchildren. This study aimed to determine outdoor and near work patterns in Polish schoolchildren before and during school closure due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> All children undergoing a routine pediatric examination in the Elbląg branch of the Hygeia Clinic, together with their parents, were asked to fill an anonymous questionnaire. The subject's age, spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, time spent outdoors, screen time and total near work in hours per day before and during the pandemic, were recorded. As substantial differences in physical activity by time of year were reported, activity patterns for June (summer) and December (winter) were recorded. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the association between the presence of myopia and outdoor and total near work time at different timepoints. <b>Results:</b> A total of 61 schoolchildren aged 11.95 ± 2.74 (range 7 to 17) years were included in this study. The mean SE in the right eye was -1.78 ± 2.11 with 46% of the individuals (n=28) classified as myopic. Before the pandemic, higher time outdoors was associated with less myopic SE (OR=0.47, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.24 to 0.93). During the pandemic, time outdoors among non-myopic children was similar to myopic children, both during winter and summer months (2.18 ± 1.81 vs. 1.89 ± 1.50; <i>P</i>=.51, and 3.47 ± 2.66 vs. 3.31 ± 1.65; <i>P</i>=.79 respectively). Time outdoors was not significantly associated with myopia during the pandemic (OR=1.17, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.14). Total near work was not associated with myopia at any time point. <b>Conclusion:</b> The long-term influence of the changing patterns of outdoor and near work on myopia prevalence and progression in our population is still to be established. Nevertheless, it is likely that the decrease of outdoor time may influence the rates of myopia in this region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"33-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2023.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2023.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:低水平的户外活动被认为是学童近视发展的重要危险因素。本研究旨在确定由于SARS-CoV-2大流行导致学校关闭之前和期间波兰学童的户外和附近工作模式。方法:所有在健康诊所Elbląg分院接受常规儿科检查的儿童及其父母填写一份匿名问卷。记录受试者的年龄、球面等效(SE)屈光误差、在户外度过的时间、屏幕时间以及在大流行之前和期间每天近距离工作的总小时数。由于报告了一年中不同时间体力活动的显著差异,因此记录了6月(夏季)和12月(冬季)的活动模式。采用多元logistic回归分析不同时间点近视发生率与户外及近工作时间的关系。结果:共纳入61名小学生,年龄11.95±2.74岁(7 ~ 17岁)。右眼平均SE为-1.78±2.11,其中46% (n=28)为近视。在大流行之前,户外活动时间越长,近视SE越少(OR=0.47, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.24至0.93)。在大流行期间,非近视儿童与近视儿童在冬季和夏季的户外活动时间相似(2.18±1.81∶1.89±1.50;P =。3.47±2.66 vs. 3.31±1.65;P =。79分别)。大流行期间,户外活动时间与近视无显著相关(OR=1.17, 95% CI 0.64至2.14)。在任何时间点,近距离工作与近视均无相关性。结论:户外和近距离工作方式的变化对我国人群近视发病率和发展的长期影响尚待确定。然而,户外活动时间的减少可能会影响该地区的近视发生率。
The outdoor time in non-myopic children has decreased to that of myopic children during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Objective: Low levels of outdoor activity are known to be an important risk factor for the development of myopia in schoolchildren. This study aimed to determine outdoor and near work patterns in Polish schoolchildren before and during school closure due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: All children undergoing a routine pediatric examination in the Elbląg branch of the Hygeia Clinic, together with their parents, were asked to fill an anonymous questionnaire. The subject's age, spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, time spent outdoors, screen time and total near work in hours per day before and during the pandemic, were recorded. As substantial differences in physical activity by time of year were reported, activity patterns for June (summer) and December (winter) were recorded. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the association between the presence of myopia and outdoor and total near work time at different timepoints. Results: A total of 61 schoolchildren aged 11.95 ± 2.74 (range 7 to 17) years were included in this study. The mean SE in the right eye was -1.78 ± 2.11 with 46% of the individuals (n=28) classified as myopic. Before the pandemic, higher time outdoors was associated with less myopic SE (OR=0.47, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.24 to 0.93). During the pandemic, time outdoors among non-myopic children was similar to myopic children, both during winter and summer months (2.18 ± 1.81 vs. 1.89 ± 1.50; P=.51, and 3.47 ± 2.66 vs. 3.31 ± 1.65; P=.79 respectively). Time outdoors was not significantly associated with myopia during the pandemic (OR=1.17, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.14). Total near work was not associated with myopia at any time point. Conclusion: The long-term influence of the changing patterns of outdoor and near work on myopia prevalence and progression in our population is still to be established. Nevertheless, it is likely that the decrease of outdoor time may influence the rates of myopia in this region.