ICU外科重症监护中桡动脉位置对导管寿命的影响。

Damien Marie, Claire Dahyot-Fizelier, Stéphanie Barrau, Matthieu Boisson, Denis Frasca, Angeline Jamet, Stéphane Chauvet, Nathan Ferrand, Amélie Pichot, Olivier Mimoz, Thomas Kerforne
{"title":"ICU外科重症监护中桡动脉位置对导管寿命的影响。","authors":"Damien Marie,&nbsp;Claire Dahyot-Fizelier,&nbsp;Stéphanie Barrau,&nbsp;Matthieu Boisson,&nbsp;Denis Frasca,&nbsp;Angeline Jamet,&nbsp;Stéphane Chauvet,&nbsp;Nathan Ferrand,&nbsp;Amélie Pichot,&nbsp;Olivier Mimoz,&nbsp;Thomas Kerforne","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of arterial catheters is frequent in intensive care for hemodynamic monitoring of patients and for blood sampling, but they are often removed because of dysfunction. The primary objective is to compare the prevalence of radial arterial catheter dysfunction according to location in relation to the radiocarpal joint in intensive care patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomized, controlled, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The surgical ICU of the university hospital of Poitiers in France.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>From January 2016 to April 2017, all patients over 18 years old admitted to the surgical ICU and requiring an arterial catheter were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Randomization into two groups: catheter placed near the wrist (within 4 cm of the radiocarpal joint) and catheter placed away the wrist. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of dysfunction. We also compared the prevalence of infection and colonization.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>One hundred seven catheters were analyzed (14 failed placements with no difference between the two groups, and 16 catheters excluded for missing data), with 58 catheters in near the wrist group and 49 in away the wrist group. We did not find any significant difference in the number of catheter dysfunctions between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.56). The prevalence density of catheter dysfunction was 30.5 of 1,000 catheter days for near the wrist group versus 26.7 of 1,000 catheter days for away the wrist group. However, we observed a significant difference in terms of catheter-related infection in favor of away the wrist group (<i>p</i> = 0.04). In addition, distal positioning of the catheter was judged easier by the physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The distal or proximal position of the arterial catheter in the radial position has no influence on the occurrence of dysfunction. However, there may be an association with the prevalence of infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/6e/cc9-5-e0905.PMC10115551.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Radial Arterial Location on Catheter Lifetime in ICU Surgical Intensive Care.\",\"authors\":\"Damien Marie,&nbsp;Claire Dahyot-Fizelier,&nbsp;Stéphanie Barrau,&nbsp;Matthieu Boisson,&nbsp;Denis Frasca,&nbsp;Angeline Jamet,&nbsp;Stéphane Chauvet,&nbsp;Nathan Ferrand,&nbsp;Amélie Pichot,&nbsp;Olivier Mimoz,&nbsp;Thomas Kerforne\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of arterial catheters is frequent in intensive care for hemodynamic monitoring of patients and for blood sampling, but they are often removed because of dysfunction. The primary objective is to compare the prevalence of radial arterial catheter dysfunction according to location in relation to the radiocarpal joint in intensive care patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomized, controlled, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The surgical ICU of the university hospital of Poitiers in France.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>From January 2016 to April 2017, all patients over 18 years old admitted to the surgical ICU and requiring an arterial catheter were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Randomization into two groups: catheter placed near the wrist (within 4 cm of the radiocarpal joint) and catheter placed away the wrist. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of dysfunction. We also compared the prevalence of infection and colonization.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>One hundred seven catheters were analyzed (14 failed placements with no difference between the two groups, and 16 catheters excluded for missing data), with 58 catheters in near the wrist group and 49 in away the wrist group. We did not find any significant difference in the number of catheter dysfunctions between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.56). The prevalence density of catheter dysfunction was 30.5 of 1,000 catheter days for near the wrist group versus 26.7 of 1,000 catheter days for away the wrist group. However, we observed a significant difference in terms of catheter-related infection in favor of away the wrist group (<i>p</i> = 0.04). In addition, distal positioning of the catheter was judged easier by the physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The distal or proximal position of the arterial catheter in the radial position has no influence on the occurrence of dysfunction. However, there may be an association with the prevalence of infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e0905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/6e/cc9-5-e0905.PMC10115551.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动脉导管在重症监护中经常用于患者的血流动力学监测和血液采样,但它们经常因功能障碍而被移除。主要目的是比较重症监护患者桡动脉导管功能障碍的患病率,根据位置与桡腕关节的关系。设计:前瞻性、随机、对照、单中心研究。地点:法国普瓦捷大学医院外科ICU。患者:2016年1月至2017年4月,所有18岁以上外科ICU收治的需要动脉导管的患者。干预措施:随机分为两组:导管放置在手腕附近(桡腕关节4cm内)和导管放置在手腕外。主要终点是功能障碍的发生率。我们还比较了感染和定植的流行程度。测量及主要结果:共分析了107根导管(14根放置失败,两组无差异,16根因数据缺失而被排除),其中近腕组58根,远离腕组49根。我们没有发现两组之间导管功能障碍的数量有显著差异(p = 0.56)。近腕组的导管功能障碍发生率为30.5 / 1000天,远腕组为26.7 / 1000天。然而,我们观察到在导管相关感染方面,远离手腕组有显著差异(p = 0.04)。此外,导管的远端定位更容易被医生判断。结论:桡骨位置动脉导管的远端或近端位置对功能障碍的发生无影响。然而,这可能与感染的流行程度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Radial Arterial Location on Catheter Lifetime in ICU Surgical Intensive Care.

The use of arterial catheters is frequent in intensive care for hemodynamic monitoring of patients and for blood sampling, but they are often removed because of dysfunction. The primary objective is to compare the prevalence of radial arterial catheter dysfunction according to location in relation to the radiocarpal joint in intensive care patients.

Design: Prospective randomized, controlled, single-center study.

Setting: The surgical ICU of the university hospital of Poitiers in France.

Patients: From January 2016 to April 2017, all patients over 18 years old admitted to the surgical ICU and requiring an arterial catheter were included.

Interventions: Randomization into two groups: catheter placed near the wrist (within 4 cm of the radiocarpal joint) and catheter placed away the wrist. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of dysfunction. We also compared the prevalence of infection and colonization.

Measurements and main results: One hundred seven catheters were analyzed (14 failed placements with no difference between the two groups, and 16 catheters excluded for missing data), with 58 catheters in near the wrist group and 49 in away the wrist group. We did not find any significant difference in the number of catheter dysfunctions between the two groups (p = 0.56). The prevalence density of catheter dysfunction was 30.5 of 1,000 catheter days for near the wrist group versus 26.7 of 1,000 catheter days for away the wrist group. However, we observed a significant difference in terms of catheter-related infection in favor of away the wrist group (p = 0.04). In addition, distal positioning of the catheter was judged easier by the physicians.

Conclusions: The distal or proximal position of the arterial catheter in the radial position has no influence on the occurrence of dysfunction. However, there may be an association with the prevalence of infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1