促进移民正义的社区心理学:批判性地审视 COVID-19 综合症期间的边境暴力和抵抗。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American journal of community psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1002/ajcp.12669
Francesca Esposito, Dora Rebelo, Moshood Olanrewaju, Megan Vine, Maria Fernandes-Jesus, Debi Bodden, Aminata Kalokoh, Bradley Olson
{"title":"促进移民正义的社区心理学:批判性地审视 COVID-19 综合症期间的边境暴力和抵抗。","authors":"Francesca Esposito,&nbsp;Dora Rebelo,&nbsp;Moshood Olanrewaju,&nbsp;Megan Vine,&nbsp;Maria Fernandes-Jesus,&nbsp;Debi Bodden,&nbsp;Aminata Kalokoh,&nbsp;Bradley Olson","doi":"10.1002/ajcp.12669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the magnifying lenses of the COVID-19 <i>syndemic</i> to highlight how people racialized as migrants and refugees have been—and continue to be—disproportionally harmed. We use empirical evidence collected in our scholarly/activist work in Europe, Africa, South Asia, and the United States to examine migrant injustice as being produced by a combination of power structures and relations working to maintain colonial global orders and inequalities. This is what has been defined as “border imperialism.” Our data, complemented by evidence from transnational solidarity groups, show that border imperialism has further intersected with the hygienic-sanitary logics of social control at play during the COVID-19 period. This intersection has resulted in increasingly coercive methods of restraining people on the move, as well as in increased—and new—forms of degradation of their lives, that is, an overall multiplication of border violences. At the same time, however, COVID-19 has provided a unique opportunity for grassroot solidarity initiatives and resistance led by people on the move to be amplified and extended. We conclude by emphasizing the need for community psychologists to take a more vigorous stance against oppressive border imperialist regimes and the related forms of violence they re/enact.</p>","PeriodicalId":7576,"journal":{"name":"American journal of community psychology","volume":"73 1-2","pages":"27-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajcp.12669","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A community psychology for migrant justice: Critically examining border violence and resistance during the COVID-19 syndemic\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Esposito,&nbsp;Dora Rebelo,&nbsp;Moshood Olanrewaju,&nbsp;Megan Vine,&nbsp;Maria Fernandes-Jesus,&nbsp;Debi Bodden,&nbsp;Aminata Kalokoh,&nbsp;Bradley Olson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajcp.12669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article explores the magnifying lenses of the COVID-19 <i>syndemic</i> to highlight how people racialized as migrants and refugees have been—and continue to be—disproportionally harmed. We use empirical evidence collected in our scholarly/activist work in Europe, Africa, South Asia, and the United States to examine migrant injustice as being produced by a combination of power structures and relations working to maintain colonial global orders and inequalities. This is what has been defined as “border imperialism.” Our data, complemented by evidence from transnational solidarity groups, show that border imperialism has further intersected with the hygienic-sanitary logics of social control at play during the COVID-19 period. This intersection has resulted in increasingly coercive methods of restraining people on the move, as well as in increased—and new—forms of degradation of their lives, that is, an overall multiplication of border violences. At the same time, however, COVID-19 has provided a unique opportunity for grassroot solidarity initiatives and resistance led by people on the move to be amplified and extended. We conclude by emphasizing the need for community psychologists to take a more vigorous stance against oppressive border imperialist regimes and the related forms of violence they re/enact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of community psychology\",\"volume\":\"73 1-2\",\"pages\":\"27-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajcp.12669\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of community psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajcp.12669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajcp.12669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了 COVID-19 综合征的放大镜,以强调被种族化为移民和难民的人们是如何受到--并将继续受到--不成比例的伤害的。我们利用在欧洲、非洲、南亚和美国从事学术/活动工作时收集到的经验证据,将移民不公正现象视为由权力结构和关系共同造成的,这些权力结构和关系旨在维护殖民主义的全球秩序和不平等。这就是所谓的 "边境帝国主义"。我们的数据以及来自跨国团结组织的证据表明,在 COVID-19 期间,边境帝国主义与社会控制的卫生逻辑进一步交织在一起。这种交叉导致了对流动人口越来越多的强制限制手段,以及对他们生活越来越多的--新形式的--侮辱,即边境暴力的全面倍增。但与此同时,COVID-19 也为基层团结行动和流动人口的抵抗运动提供了一个独特的机会,使其得以扩大和延伸。最后,我们强调社区心理学家有必要采取更加有力的立场,反对压迫性的边境帝国主义制度及其重演/上演的相关暴力形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A community psychology for migrant justice: Critically examining border violence and resistance during the COVID-19 syndemic

This article explores the magnifying lenses of the COVID-19 syndemic to highlight how people racialized as migrants and refugees have been—and continue to be—disproportionally harmed. We use empirical evidence collected in our scholarly/activist work in Europe, Africa, South Asia, and the United States to examine migrant injustice as being produced by a combination of power structures and relations working to maintain colonial global orders and inequalities. This is what has been defined as “border imperialism.” Our data, complemented by evidence from transnational solidarity groups, show that border imperialism has further intersected with the hygienic-sanitary logics of social control at play during the COVID-19 period. This intersection has resulted in increasingly coercive methods of restraining people on the move, as well as in increased—and new—forms of degradation of their lives, that is, an overall multiplication of border violences. At the same time, however, COVID-19 has provided a unique opportunity for grassroot solidarity initiatives and resistance led by people on the move to be amplified and extended. We conclude by emphasizing the need for community psychologists to take a more vigorous stance against oppressive border imperialist regimes and the related forms of violence they re/enact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Community Psychology publishes original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; theoretical papers; empirical reviews; reports of innovative community programs or policies; and first person accounts of stakeholders involved in research, programs, or policy. The journal encourages submissions of innovative multi-level research and interventions, and encourages international submissions. The journal also encourages the submission of manuscripts concerned with underrepresented populations and issues of human diversity. The American Journal of Community Psychology publishes research, theory, and descriptions of innovative interventions on a wide range of topics, including, but not limited to: individual, family, peer, and community mental health, physical health, and substance use; risk and protective factors for health and well being; educational, legal, and work environment processes, policies, and opportunities; social ecological approaches, including the interplay of individual family, peer, institutional, neighborhood, and community processes; social welfare, social justice, and human rights; social problems and social change; program, system, and policy evaluations; and, understanding people within their social, cultural, economic, geographic, and historical contexts.
期刊最新文献
Proximal and distal minority stressors and mental health among young gay and bisexual men and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in Kisumu, Kenya. Social ecological predictors and correlates of Latinos' IPV behaviors: A systematic review and critique of the research literature. Issue Information Is cultural appropriateness culturally specific? Intersectional insights from a community-based participatory mental health intervention study conducted with diverse cultural groups. Freedom dreaming in carceral spaces: Youth care workers' imagined alternatives to anti-Black racism in residential facilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1