验证用于气管插管培训的带有触觉反馈的虚拟模拟器。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000708
Adam Ryason, Zhaohui Xia, Cullen Jackson, Vanessa T Wong, Hong Li, Suvranu De, Stephanie B Jones
{"title":"验证用于气管插管培训的带有触觉反馈的虚拟模拟器。","authors":"Adam Ryason, Zhaohui Xia, Cullen Jackson, Vanessa T Wong, Hong Li, Suvranu De, Stephanie B Jones","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a procedure that varies in difficulty because of patient characteristics and clinical conditions. Existing physical simulators do not encompass these variations. The Virtual Airway Skills Trainer for Endotracheal Intubation (VAST-ETI) was developed to provide different patient characteristics and high-fidelity haptic feedback to improve training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We demonstrate the effectiveness of VAST-ETI as a training and evaluation tool for ETI. Construct validation was evaluated by scoring the performance of experts ( N = 15) and novices ( N = 15) on the simulator to ensure its ability to distinguish technical proficiency. Convergent and predictive validity were evaluated by performing a learning curve study, in which a group of novices ( N = 7) were trained for 2 weeks using VAST-ETI and then compared with a control group ( N = 9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAST-ETI was able to distinguish between expert and novice based on mean simulator scores ( t [88] = -6.61, P < 0.0005). When used during repeated practice, individuals demonstrated a significant increase in their score on VAST-ETI over the learning period ( F [11,220] = 7206, P < 0.001); however when compared with a control group, there was not a significant interaction effect on the simulator score. There was a significant difference between the simulator-trained and control groups ( t [12.85] = -2.258, P = 0.042) when tested in the operating room.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of virtual simulation with haptic feedback for assessing performance and training of ETI. The simulator was not able to differentiate performance between more experienced trainees and experts because of limits in simulator difficulty.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Virtual Simulator With Haptic Feedback for Endotracheal Intubation Training.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Ryason, Zhaohui Xia, Cullen Jackson, Vanessa T Wong, Hong Li, Suvranu De, Stephanie B Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a procedure that varies in difficulty because of patient characteristics and clinical conditions. Existing physical simulators do not encompass these variations. The Virtual Airway Skills Trainer for Endotracheal Intubation (VAST-ETI) was developed to provide different patient characteristics and high-fidelity haptic feedback to improve training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We demonstrate the effectiveness of VAST-ETI as a training and evaluation tool for ETI. Construct validation was evaluated by scoring the performance of experts ( N = 15) and novices ( N = 15) on the simulator to ensure its ability to distinguish technical proficiency. Convergent and predictive validity were evaluated by performing a learning curve study, in which a group of novices ( N = 7) were trained for 2 weeks using VAST-ETI and then compared with a control group ( N = 9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAST-ETI was able to distinguish between expert and novice based on mean simulator scores ( t [88] = -6.61, P < 0.0005). When used during repeated practice, individuals demonstrated a significant increase in their score on VAST-ETI over the learning period ( F [11,220] = 7206, P < 0.001); however when compared with a control group, there was not a significant interaction effect on the simulator score. There was a significant difference between the simulator-trained and control groups ( t [12.85] = -2.258, P = 0.042) when tested in the operating room.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of virtual simulation with haptic feedback for assessing performance and training of ETI. The simulator was not able to differentiate performance between more experienced trainees and experts because of limits in simulator difficulty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314962/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:气管内插管(ETI)是一项因患者特征和临床条件而难度各异的手术。现有的物理模拟器无法涵盖这些变化。我们开发了气管插管虚拟气道技能训练器(VAST-ETI),以提供不同的患者特征和高保真触觉反馈来改善训练:我们证明了 VAST-ETI 作为 ETI 培训和评估工具的有效性。通过对专家(15 人)和新手(15 人)在模拟器上的表现进行评分来评估结构验证,以确保其能够区分技术熟练程度。通过学习曲线研究评估了收敛有效性和预测有效性。在该研究中,一组新手(N = 7)使用 VAST-ETI 接受了为期 2 周的培训,然后与对照组(N = 9)进行了比较:结果:根据模拟器的平均得分,VAST-ETI 能够区分专家和新手(t[88] = -6.61,P < 0.0005)。在反复练习中使用时,个人在学习期间的 VAST-ETI 分数显著增加(F[11,220] = 7206,P < 0.001);但与对照组相比,模拟器分数没有显著的交互效应。在手术室进行测试时,模拟器培训组和对照组之间存在明显差异(t[12.85] = -2.258,P = 0.042):我们的研究结果表明,带有触觉反馈的虚拟仿真在评估 ETI 性能和培训方面非常有效。由于模拟器难度的限制,模拟器无法区分经验丰富的学员和专家的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a Virtual Simulator With Haptic Feedback for Endotracheal Intubation Training.

Introduction: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a procedure that varies in difficulty because of patient characteristics and clinical conditions. Existing physical simulators do not encompass these variations. The Virtual Airway Skills Trainer for Endotracheal Intubation (VAST-ETI) was developed to provide different patient characteristics and high-fidelity haptic feedback to improve training.

Methods: We demonstrate the effectiveness of VAST-ETI as a training and evaluation tool for ETI. Construct validation was evaluated by scoring the performance of experts ( N = 15) and novices ( N = 15) on the simulator to ensure its ability to distinguish technical proficiency. Convergent and predictive validity were evaluated by performing a learning curve study, in which a group of novices ( N = 7) were trained for 2 weeks using VAST-ETI and then compared with a control group ( N = 9).

Results: The VAST-ETI was able to distinguish between expert and novice based on mean simulator scores ( t [88] = -6.61, P < 0.0005). When used during repeated practice, individuals demonstrated a significant increase in their score on VAST-ETI over the learning period ( F [11,220] = 7206, P < 0.001); however when compared with a control group, there was not a significant interaction effect on the simulator score. There was a significant difference between the simulator-trained and control groups ( t [12.85] = -2.258, P = 0.042) when tested in the operating room.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of virtual simulation with haptic feedback for assessing performance and training of ETI. The simulator was not able to differentiate performance between more experienced trainees and experts because of limits in simulator difficulty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Creation of a Novel Child Simulator and Curriculum to Optimize Administration of Seizure Rescue Medication. Increase in Newborns Ventilated Within the First Minute of Life and Reduced Mortality After Clinical Data-Guided Simulation Training. Systematic Review of Procedural Skill Simulation in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Optimal Duration of High-Fidelity Simulator Training for Bronchoscope-Guided Intubation: A Noninferiority Randomized Trial. Theoretical, Conceptual, and Operational Aspects in Simulation Training With Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1