抗体-药物偶联物治疗三阴性和HER-2阳性乳腺癌的疗效和安全性:临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

Breast disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3233/BD-220052
Fatima Afzal, Wajeeha Aiman, Hafsa Zahoor, Ayfa Riaz Bajwa, Syeda Hafsa Kazmi, Aqsa Anwar, Muhammad Yasir Anwar, Sana Rashid, Hina Zubair, Tooba Kashif, Muhammad Ashar Ali
{"title":"抗体-药物偶联物治疗三阴性和HER-2阳性乳腺癌的疗效和安全性:临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Fatima Afzal,&nbsp;Wajeeha Aiman,&nbsp;Hafsa Zahoor,&nbsp;Ayfa Riaz Bajwa,&nbsp;Syeda Hafsa Kazmi,&nbsp;Aqsa Anwar,&nbsp;Muhammad Yasir Anwar,&nbsp;Sana Rashid,&nbsp;Hina Zubair,&nbsp;Tooba Kashif,&nbsp;Muhammad Ashar Ali","doi":"10.3233/BD-220052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer (BC) is the 2nd most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are monoclonal antibodies linked to cytotoxic agents and are directed towards a specific tumor protein. Therefore, they are more potent and can have relatively less toxicity. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ADCs in breast cancer. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for relevant studies and included 7 randomized clinical trials (N = 5,302) and 7 non-randomized clinical trials (N = 658). R programming language software was used to conduct this meta-analysis. In 4 RCTs on HER-2 positive BC (N = 2,825), the pooled HR of PFS and OS was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.61-0.84, I2 = 71%) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.64-0.84, I2 = 20%), respectively in favor of ADCs versus chemotherapy. In RCT on triple negative BC (N = 468), HR of PFS and OS were 0.55 (95%CI = 0.51-0.61) and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.54-0.66), respectively, in favor of saci-gov versus chemotherapy. In RCT on HER-2 positive residual invasive BC, HR of recurrence/death was 0.61 (95% CI = 0.54-0.69) in favor of ADC versus chemotherapy. In an RCT (N = 524), the HR of PFS and OS were 0.28 (95% CI = 0.22-0.37) and 0.55 (95%CI = 0.36-0.86), respectively, in favor of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-der) as compared to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). Anemia, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, and elevated aminotransferases were the common ≥grade 3 adverse events reported in 4%, 1%, 2%, 1%, 2%, 9%, and 3% of the patients, respectively. ADCs were more effective than single and double agent chemotherapy in patients with HER-2 positive or triple negative BC. Among ADCs, T-der was more effective than T-DM1.</p>","PeriodicalId":9224,"journal":{"name":"Breast disease","volume":"42 1","pages":"121-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in triple-negative and HER-2 positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Afzal,&nbsp;Wajeeha Aiman,&nbsp;Hafsa Zahoor,&nbsp;Ayfa Riaz Bajwa,&nbsp;Syeda Hafsa Kazmi,&nbsp;Aqsa Anwar,&nbsp;Muhammad Yasir Anwar,&nbsp;Sana Rashid,&nbsp;Hina Zubair,&nbsp;Tooba Kashif,&nbsp;Muhammad Ashar Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/BD-220052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Breast cancer (BC) is the 2nd most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are monoclonal antibodies linked to cytotoxic agents and are directed towards a specific tumor protein. Therefore, they are more potent and can have relatively less toxicity. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ADCs in breast cancer. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for relevant studies and included 7 randomized clinical trials (N = 5,302) and 7 non-randomized clinical trials (N = 658). R programming language software was used to conduct this meta-analysis. In 4 RCTs on HER-2 positive BC (N = 2,825), the pooled HR of PFS and OS was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.61-0.84, I2 = 71%) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.64-0.84, I2 = 20%), respectively in favor of ADCs versus chemotherapy. In RCT on triple negative BC (N = 468), HR of PFS and OS were 0.55 (95%CI = 0.51-0.61) and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.54-0.66), respectively, in favor of saci-gov versus chemotherapy. In RCT on HER-2 positive residual invasive BC, HR of recurrence/death was 0.61 (95% CI = 0.54-0.69) in favor of ADC versus chemotherapy. In an RCT (N = 524), the HR of PFS and OS were 0.28 (95% CI = 0.22-0.37) and 0.55 (95%CI = 0.36-0.86), respectively, in favor of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-der) as compared to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). Anemia, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, and elevated aminotransferases were the common ≥grade 3 adverse events reported in 4%, 1%, 2%, 1%, 2%, 9%, and 3% of the patients, respectively. ADCs were more effective than single and double agent chemotherapy in patients with HER-2 positive or triple negative BC. Among ADCs, T-der was more effective than T-DM1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast disease\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"121-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/BD-220052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BD-220052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳腺癌(BC)是癌症相关死亡的第二大常见原因。抗体-药物偶联物(adc)是一种与细胞毒性药物连接的单克隆抗体,针对特定的肿瘤蛋白。因此,它们的效力更强,毒性相对更小。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了adc治疗乳腺癌的有效性和安全性。我们检索PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science和clinicaltrials.gov等相关研究,纳入7项随机临床试验(N = 5302)和7项非随机临床试验(N = 658)。采用R编程语言软件进行meta分析。在4个HER-2阳性BC的rct中(N = 2,825), PFS和OS的合并HR分别为0.72 (95% CI = 0.61-0.84, I2 = 71%)和0.73 (95% CI = 0.64-0.84, I2 = 20%),分别支持adc与化疗。在三阴性BC (N = 468)的RCT中,PFS和OS的HR分别为0.55 (95%CI = 0.51-0.61)和0.59 (95%CI = 0.54-0.66),支持saci-gov与化疗。在HER-2阳性残余浸润性BC的RCT中,复发/死亡的HR为0.61 (95% CI = 0.54-0.69),支持ADC与化疗。在一项RCT (N = 524)中,PFS和OS的HR分别为0.28 (95%CI = 0.22-0.37)和0.55 (95%CI = 0.36-0.86),与曲妥珠单抗-emtansine (T-DM1)相比,曲妥珠单抗-德鲁西替康(T-der)更有利。贫血、皮疹、腹泻、疲劳、高血压、血小板减少和转氨酶升高是常见的≥3级不良事件,分别在4%、1%、2%、1%、2%、9%和3%的患者中报道。在HER-2阳性或三阴性BC患者中,adc比单药和双药化疗更有效。adc中,T-der比T-DM1更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in triple-negative and HER-2 positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Breast cancer (BC) is the 2nd most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are monoclonal antibodies linked to cytotoxic agents and are directed towards a specific tumor protein. Therefore, they are more potent and can have relatively less toxicity. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ADCs in breast cancer. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for relevant studies and included 7 randomized clinical trials (N = 5,302) and 7 non-randomized clinical trials (N = 658). R programming language software was used to conduct this meta-analysis. In 4 RCTs on HER-2 positive BC (N = 2,825), the pooled HR of PFS and OS was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.61-0.84, I2 = 71%) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.64-0.84, I2 = 20%), respectively in favor of ADCs versus chemotherapy. In RCT on triple negative BC (N = 468), HR of PFS and OS were 0.55 (95%CI = 0.51-0.61) and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.54-0.66), respectively, in favor of saci-gov versus chemotherapy. In RCT on HER-2 positive residual invasive BC, HR of recurrence/death was 0.61 (95% CI = 0.54-0.69) in favor of ADC versus chemotherapy. In an RCT (N = 524), the HR of PFS and OS were 0.28 (95% CI = 0.22-0.37) and 0.55 (95%CI = 0.36-0.86), respectively, in favor of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-der) as compared to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). Anemia, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, and elevated aminotransferases were the common ≥grade 3 adverse events reported in 4%, 1%, 2%, 1%, 2%, 9%, and 3% of the patients, respectively. ADCs were more effective than single and double agent chemotherapy in patients with HER-2 positive or triple negative BC. Among ADCs, T-der was more effective than T-DM1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast disease
Breast disease Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The recent expansion of work in the field of breast cancer inevitably will hasten discoveries that will have impact on patient outcome. The breadth of this research that spans basic science, clinical medicine, epidemiology, and public policy poses difficulties for investigators. Not only is it necessary to be facile in comprehending ideas from many disciplines, but also important to understand the public implications of these discoveries. Breast Disease publishes review issues devoted to an in-depth analysis of the scientific and public implications of recent research on a specific problem in breast cancer. Thus, the reviews will not only discuss recent discoveries but will also reflect on their impact in breast cancer research or clinical management.
期刊最新文献
Sentinel node in breast cancer as an indicator of quality in medical care: Evaluation of statistics in Colombia. Telangiectasias induced by combination tucatinib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine in a patient with metastatic breast cancer. Clinicopathological analysis of 38 male patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer pathological stage at diagnosis in Tunisian patients. Use of axillary ultrasound to guide breast cancer management in the genomic assay era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1