肝移植患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影的安全性和适应症:对美国国家住院患者样本数据库的分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.20524/aog.2023.0801
Zahid Ijaz Tarar, Umer Farooq, Mustafa Gandhi, Muhammad Usman Zafar, Saad Saleem, Faisal Kamal
{"title":"肝移植患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影的安全性和适应症:对美国国家住院患者样本数据库的分析。","authors":"Zahid Ijaz Tarar,&nbsp;Umer Farooq,&nbsp;Mustafa Gandhi,&nbsp;Muhammad Usman Zafar,&nbsp;Saad Saleem,&nbsp;Faisal Kamal","doi":"10.20524/aog.2023.0801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed to treat biliary complications after a liver transplantation; however, the previously available literature on the safety of ERCP in liver transplant patients is limited. We aimed to study the safety of ERCP in liver transplant patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2019 to identify patients who underwent ERCP and had a history of a liver transplantation, using the international classification of diseases, 10<sup>th</sup> revision. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the odds of post-ERCP complications in liver transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Liver transplant patients who underwent ERCP had a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding compared to the general adult population (11.39% vs. 9.19%, 0.83% vs. 0.53%, respectively). However, the adjusted odds of post-ERCP pancreatitis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.49; P=0.36) and bleeding (aOR 1.41, 95%CI 0.58-3.46; P=0.45) were similar in both the liver transplant and no-transplant groups. There was no difference in the odds of post-ERCP cholangitis (aOR 1.26, 95%CI 0.80-2.01; P=0.32), and sepsis (aOR 0.94, 95%CI 0.66-1.34; P=0.76) between liver transplant and no transplant groups. Biliary stricture was the most common indication for ERCP in the liver transplant group, whereas choledocholithiasis was the main reason for ERCP in the general adult population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERCP is a safe procedure for treating biliary complications in liver transplant patients. The odds of post-ERCP complications (pancreatitis, bleeding, sepsis, cholangitis) in liver transplant patients are comparable to those in patients with no transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/d3/AnnGastroenterol-36-459.PMC10304520.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in liver transplant patients: an analysis of the United States' National Inpatient Sample database.\",\"authors\":\"Zahid Ijaz Tarar,&nbsp;Umer Farooq,&nbsp;Mustafa Gandhi,&nbsp;Muhammad Usman Zafar,&nbsp;Saad Saleem,&nbsp;Faisal Kamal\",\"doi\":\"10.20524/aog.2023.0801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed to treat biliary complications after a liver transplantation; however, the previously available literature on the safety of ERCP in liver transplant patients is limited. We aimed to study the safety of ERCP in liver transplant patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2019 to identify patients who underwent ERCP and had a history of a liver transplantation, using the international classification of diseases, 10<sup>th</sup> revision. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the odds of post-ERCP complications in liver transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Liver transplant patients who underwent ERCP had a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding compared to the general adult population (11.39% vs. 9.19%, 0.83% vs. 0.53%, respectively). However, the adjusted odds of post-ERCP pancreatitis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.49; P=0.36) and bleeding (aOR 1.41, 95%CI 0.58-3.46; P=0.45) were similar in both the liver transplant and no-transplant groups. There was no difference in the odds of post-ERCP cholangitis (aOR 1.26, 95%CI 0.80-2.01; P=0.32), and sepsis (aOR 0.94, 95%CI 0.66-1.34; P=0.76) between liver transplant and no transplant groups. Biliary stricture was the most common indication for ERCP in the liver transplant group, whereas choledocholithiasis was the main reason for ERCP in the general adult population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERCP is a safe procedure for treating biliary complications in liver transplant patients. The odds of post-ERCP complications (pancreatitis, bleeding, sepsis, cholangitis) in liver transplant patients are comparable to those in patients with no transplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/d3/AnnGastroenterol-36-459.PMC10304520.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2023.0801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2023.0801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)用于治疗肝移植术后的胆道并发症;然而,以前关于肝移植患者ERCP安全性的文献是有限的。我们旨在研究肝移植患者ERCP的安全性。方法:我们使用2016-2019年的国家住院患者样本数据库,使用国际疾病分类第10次修订版,确定接受ERCP并有肝移植史的患者。采用多因素逻辑回归分析来确定肝移植受者ERCP术后并发症的发生率。结果:与普通成年人群相比,接受ERCP的肝移植患者发生ERCP后胰腺炎和出血的比率更高(分别为11.39%和9.19%,0.83%和0.53%)。然而,肝移植组和非肝移植组ERCP术后胰腺炎(调整后比值比[aOR]1.13,95%置信区间[CI]0.86-1.49;P=0.36)和出血(aOR1.41,95%CI0.58-3.46;P=0.45)的调整后比值相似。肝移植组和非肝移植组发生ERCP后胆管炎(aOR 1.26,95%CI 0.80-2.01;P=0.32)和败血症(aOR 0.94,95%CI 0.66-1.34;P=0.76)的几率没有差异。在肝移植组中,胆道狭窄是ERCP最常见的指征,而在普通成年人群中,胆总管结石是ERCP的主要原因。结论:ERCP是治疗肝移植患者胆道并发症的安全方法。肝移植患者发生ERCP术后并发症(胰腺炎、出血、败血症、胆管炎)的几率与未进行肝移植的患者相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in liver transplant patients: an analysis of the United States' National Inpatient Sample database.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed to treat biliary complications after a liver transplantation; however, the previously available literature on the safety of ERCP in liver transplant patients is limited. We aimed to study the safety of ERCP in liver transplant patients.

Methods: We used a National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2019 to identify patients who underwent ERCP and had a history of a liver transplantation, using the international classification of diseases, 10th revision. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the odds of post-ERCP complications in liver transplant recipients.

Results: Liver transplant patients who underwent ERCP had a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding compared to the general adult population (11.39% vs. 9.19%, 0.83% vs. 0.53%, respectively). However, the adjusted odds of post-ERCP pancreatitis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.49; P=0.36) and bleeding (aOR 1.41, 95%CI 0.58-3.46; P=0.45) were similar in both the liver transplant and no-transplant groups. There was no difference in the odds of post-ERCP cholangitis (aOR 1.26, 95%CI 0.80-2.01; P=0.32), and sepsis (aOR 0.94, 95%CI 0.66-1.34; P=0.76) between liver transplant and no transplant groups. Biliary stricture was the most common indication for ERCP in the liver transplant group, whereas choledocholithiasis was the main reason for ERCP in the general adult population.

Conclusions: ERCP is a safe procedure for treating biliary complications in liver transplant patients. The odds of post-ERCP complications (pancreatitis, bleeding, sepsis, cholangitis) in liver transplant patients are comparable to those in patients with no transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Inflammatory bowel disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa Region: a comprehensive analysis of incidence, prevalence, and mortality from 1990-2019. Meandering main pancreatic duct syndrome: a single-center cohort study and aggregated review. Micronutrient deficiencies in older patients with inflammatory bowel disease are not associated with worse adverse clinical outcome rates. Safe outpatient discharge after gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation and analgesia: a systematic literature review. The effect of shortening vasoactive drug durations alongside endoscopic therapy in esophageal variceal bleeding: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1