对916份可摘局部义齿修复处方进行质量审核。

Q3 Medicine 华西口腔医学杂志 Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.7518/hxkq.2023.2021565
Na Zhang, Bochun Mao, Yunhan Dai, Shengkai Chen, Ziying You, Junjing Zhang, Xin Chen, Haoyue Dong, Li Yue, Haiyang Yu
{"title":"对916份可摘局部义齿修复处方进行质量审核。","authors":"Na Zhang,&nbsp;Bochun Mao,&nbsp;Yunhan Dai,&nbsp;Shengkai Chen,&nbsp;Ziying You,&nbsp;Junjing Zhang,&nbsp;Xin Chen,&nbsp;Haoyue Dong,&nbsp;Li Yue,&nbsp;Haiyang Yu","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2023.2021565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to assess the quality of prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures (RPDs) and to analyze the current situation of the communication and information delivery between clinicians and technicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All RPD prosthetic prescriptions received by a major dental laboratory in 4 weeks were involved in a quality audit, and the prescriptions were divided into three groups in accordance with the grades of clients. The filling of prosthetic prescriptions was recorded. The items in the prescriptions for audit included the general information of the patient, the general information of the clinician, the design diagram information, other detailed information, and the return date. The prescriptions were categorized into four levels on the basis of their quality by two quality inspectors who have been working for more than 10 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 916 prescriptions were collected and assessed. The names in the general information of the patient and the clinician were filled out best, both at the rate of 97.6% (<i>n</i>=894). The return date was filled out worst, only at the rate of 6.4% (<i>n</i>=59). Of those prescriptions, 86.8% (<i>n</i>=795) exhibited inadequate design diagram information. The results of the quality assessment demonstrated that 74.2% of prescriptions were assessed as noncompliant ones and failed to meet the acceptable clinical quality standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At present, the overall quality of RPD prosthetic prescriptions is poor. The responsibilities of clinicians and technicians are unclear, and the communication between them is not ideal.</p>","PeriodicalId":35800,"journal":{"name":"华西口腔医学杂志","volume":"41 3","pages":"315-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317851/pdf/wcjs-41-03-315.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit to assess the quality of 916 prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures.\",\"authors\":\"Na Zhang,&nbsp;Bochun Mao,&nbsp;Yunhan Dai,&nbsp;Shengkai Chen,&nbsp;Ziying You,&nbsp;Junjing Zhang,&nbsp;Xin Chen,&nbsp;Haoyue Dong,&nbsp;Li Yue,&nbsp;Haiyang Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.7518/hxkq.2023.2021565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to assess the quality of prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures (RPDs) and to analyze the current situation of the communication and information delivery between clinicians and technicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All RPD prosthetic prescriptions received by a major dental laboratory in 4 weeks were involved in a quality audit, and the prescriptions were divided into three groups in accordance with the grades of clients. The filling of prosthetic prescriptions was recorded. The items in the prescriptions for audit included the general information of the patient, the general information of the clinician, the design diagram information, other detailed information, and the return date. The prescriptions were categorized into four levels on the basis of their quality by two quality inspectors who have been working for more than 10 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 916 prescriptions were collected and assessed. The names in the general information of the patient and the clinician were filled out best, both at the rate of 97.6% (<i>n</i>=894). The return date was filled out worst, only at the rate of 6.4% (<i>n</i>=59). Of those prescriptions, 86.8% (<i>n</i>=795) exhibited inadequate design diagram information. The results of the quality assessment demonstrated that 74.2% of prescriptions were assessed as noncompliant ones and failed to meet the acceptable clinical quality standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At present, the overall quality of RPD prosthetic prescriptions is poor. The responsibilities of clinicians and technicians are unclear, and the communication between them is not ideal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"华西口腔医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"315-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317851/pdf/wcjs-41-03-315.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"华西口腔医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2023.2021565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"华西口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2023.2021565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价可摘局部义齿义肢处方质量,分析临床医师与技术人员之间的沟通和信息传递现状。方法:对某大型牙科实验室4周内收到的所有RPD假体处方进行质量审核,并根据客户的等级将处方分为三组。记录假体处方的填充情况。审核处方项目包括患者一般信息、临床医生一般信息、设计图信息、其他详细信息、复诊日期。两名工作了10多年的质量检查员根据处方的质量将其分为四个级别。结果:共收集评价处方916张。患者和临床医师一般资料中姓名的填写率最高,均为97.6% (n=894)。回访日期填写最差,仅为6.4% (n=59)。在这些处方中,86.8% (n=795)的设计图纸信息不充分。质量评价结果显示,74.2%的处方不符合标准,不符合临床可接受的质量标准。结论:目前RPD假体处方整体质量较差。临床医生和技术人员的职责不明确,他们之间的沟通不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Audit to assess the quality of 916 prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the quality of prosthetic prescriptions of removable partial dentures (RPDs) and to analyze the current situation of the communication and information delivery between clinicians and technicians.

Methods: All RPD prosthetic prescriptions received by a major dental laboratory in 4 weeks were involved in a quality audit, and the prescriptions were divided into three groups in accordance with the grades of clients. The filling of prosthetic prescriptions was recorded. The items in the prescriptions for audit included the general information of the patient, the general information of the clinician, the design diagram information, other detailed information, and the return date. The prescriptions were categorized into four levels on the basis of their quality by two quality inspectors who have been working for more than 10 years.

Results: A total of 916 prescriptions were collected and assessed. The names in the general information of the patient and the clinician were filled out best, both at the rate of 97.6% (n=894). The return date was filled out worst, only at the rate of 6.4% (n=59). Of those prescriptions, 86.8% (n=795) exhibited inadequate design diagram information. The results of the quality assessment demonstrated that 74.2% of prescriptions were assessed as noncompliant ones and failed to meet the acceptable clinical quality standard.

Conclusions: At present, the overall quality of RPD prosthetic prescriptions is poor. The responsibilities of clinicians and technicians are unclear, and the communication between them is not ideal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
华西口腔医学杂志
华西口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6397
期刊介绍: West China Journal of Stomatology (WCJS, pISSN 1000-1182, eISSN 2618-0456, CN 51-1169/R), published bimonthly, is a peer-reviewed Open Access journal, hosted by Sichuan university and Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. WCJS was established in 1983 and indexed in Medline/Pubmed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, Chemical Abstract(CA), CNKI, WANFANG Data, etc.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy and long-term stability of tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession: a Meta-analysis. Intentional replantation for the retreatment of mandibular second molar: a case report. Simultaneous implantation and tooth preparation technology guided by 3D-printed guide. Three-dimensional reconstruction reveals the correlation between the extent of alveolar clefts and secondary nasal deformity in adults. Application of modified articular disc anchorage in treating the perforation and rupture of temporomandibular joint disc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1