撒哈拉以南非洲孕妇对磺胺嘧啶-乙胺嘧啶使用的认识:范围审查。

Patricia Ogba, Oluwaseun Badru, Bonny Ibhawoh, Norm Archer, Andrea Baumann
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲孕妇对磺胺嘧啶-乙胺嘧啶使用的认识:范围审查。","authors":"Patricia Ogba,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Badru,&nbsp;Bonny Ibhawoh,&nbsp;Norm Archer,&nbsp;Andrea Baumann","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7828460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is a major global public health issue that disproportionately affects pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. The World Health Organization recommends intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) for its control. Despite its proven efficacy, drug uptake remains low. Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) safety concerns have been cited as one of several reasons for this low uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the health belief model to investigate perceptions of SP use among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. We looked for peer-reviewed publications in five international databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 19 articles out of a total of 246. It showed that pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa have a good understanding of malaria and its consequences, but this does not necessarily translate into increased IPTp-SP uptake. It is worrisome to know that some pregnant women (from 2 studies) did not believe that SP use is beneficial, and several participants (from 4 studies) were unsure or did not see the drug as an effective intervention. Many pregnant women believe SP harms them, their partners, or their unborn children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals should continue prescribing and encouraging pregnant women to use SP for malaria prevention until a better substitute becomes available.</p>","PeriodicalId":74100,"journal":{"name":"MalariaWorld journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine use among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Ogba,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Badru,&nbsp;Bonny Ibhawoh,&nbsp;Norm Archer,&nbsp;Andrea Baumann\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.7828460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is a major global public health issue that disproportionately affects pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. The World Health Organization recommends intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) for its control. Despite its proven efficacy, drug uptake remains low. Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) safety concerns have been cited as one of several reasons for this low uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the health belief model to investigate perceptions of SP use among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. We looked for peer-reviewed publications in five international databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 19 articles out of a total of 246. It showed that pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa have a good understanding of malaria and its consequences, but this does not necessarily translate into increased IPTp-SP uptake. It is worrisome to know that some pregnant women (from 2 studies) did not believe that SP use is beneficial, and several participants (from 4 studies) were unsure or did not see the drug as an effective intervention. Many pregnant women believe SP harms them, their partners, or their unborn children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals should continue prescribing and encouraging pregnant women to use SP for malaria prevention until a better substitute becomes available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MalariaWorld journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117231/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MalariaWorld journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MalariaWorld journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7828460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疟疾是一个主要的全球公共卫生问题,严重影响撒哈拉以南非洲的孕妇。世界卫生组织建议用磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(IPTp-SP)进行间歇性预防治疗以控制该病。尽管其疗效已被证实,但药物摄取仍然很低。磺胺嘧啶-乙胺嘧啶(SP)的安全性问题被认为是这种低摄入量的几个原因之一。方法:我们使用Arksey和O'Malley框架和健康信念模型进行了范围审查,以调查撒哈拉以南非洲孕妇对SP使用的看法。我们在五个国际数据库中寻找同行评议的出版物。结果:共纳入246篇文献,纳入19篇。它表明撒哈拉以南非洲的孕妇对疟疾及其后果有很好的了解,但这并不一定转化为增加IPTp-SP的吸收。令人担忧的是,一些孕妇(来自2项研究)不相信使用SP是有益的,一些参与者(来自4项研究)不确定或不认为该药物是一种有效的干预措施。许多孕妇认为SP会伤害她们、她们的伴侣或未出生的孩子。结论:卫生保健专业人员应继续开处方并鼓励孕妇使用SP预防疟疾,直到有更好的替代品可用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine use among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Background: Malaria is a major global public health issue that disproportionately affects pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. The World Health Organization recommends intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) for its control. Despite its proven efficacy, drug uptake remains low. Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) safety concerns have been cited as one of several reasons for this low uptake.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the health belief model to investigate perceptions of SP use among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. We looked for peer-reviewed publications in five international databases.

Results: The review included 19 articles out of a total of 246. It showed that pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa have a good understanding of malaria and its consequences, but this does not necessarily translate into increased IPTp-SP uptake. It is worrisome to know that some pregnant women (from 2 studies) did not believe that SP use is beneficial, and several participants (from 4 studies) were unsure or did not see the drug as an effective intervention. Many pregnant women believe SP harms them, their partners, or their unborn children.

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals should continue prescribing and encouraging pregnant women to use SP for malaria prevention until a better substitute becomes available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biochemical features of the Cry4B toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and its interaction with BT-R3, a bitopic cadherin G-protein coupled receptor in Anopheles gambiae. Relapsing Plasmodium vivax malaria in a 12-year-old Brazilian girl: A case report. Uneasy bedfellows: Public-Private partnerships for malaria control. Palestine 100 years ago seen through the malaria lens: an examination of successful malaria elimination, and of where the malaria community seems to have taken a wrong turning Regaining the path to malaria elimination: Lessons from the pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1