有冠状动脉阻塞和无冠状动脉阻塞的心肌梗死患者在治疗和预后方面的性别差异:一项前瞻性多中心研究。

European Heart Journal Open Pub Date : 2023-03-27 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oead033
Michael Lawless, Yolande Appelman, John F Beltrame, Eliano P Navarese, Hanna Ratcovich, Chris Wilkinson, Vijay Kunadian
{"title":"有冠状动脉阻塞和无冠状动脉阻塞的心肌梗死患者在治疗和预后方面的性别差异:一项前瞻性多中心研究。","authors":"Michael Lawless, Yolande Appelman, John F Beltrame, Eliano P Navarese, Hanna Ratcovich, Chris Wilkinson, Vijay Kunadian","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Women have an increased prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Whether sex differences exist in the outcomes of patients with MI and obstructive coronary arteries (MIOCA) vs. MINOCA remains unclear. We describe sex-based differences in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with MINOCA vs. MIOCA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A large-scale cohort study of patients with ST/non-ST elevation MI undergoing coronary angiography (01/2015-12/2019). Patient demographics, diagnosis, prescribed discharge medications, in-hospital complications, and follow-up data were prospectively collected. A total of 13 202 participants were included (males 68.2% and females 31.8%). 10.9% were diagnosed with MINOCA. Median follow-up was 4.62 years. Females (44.8%) were as commonly diagnosed with MINOCA as males (55.2%), unlike the male preponderance in MIOCA (male, 69.8%; female, 30.2%). Less secondary prevention medications were prescribed at discharge for MINOCA than MIOCA. There was no difference in mortality risk between MINOCA and MIOCA [in-hospital: adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-2.35, <i>P</i> = 0.350; long term: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.31, <i>P</i> = 0.813]. MINOCA patients had reduced mortality at long-term follow-up if prescribed secondary prevention medications (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.87, <i>P</i> = 0.004). Females diagnosed with MIOCA had greater odds of in-hospital and 1-year mortality than males (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.07, <i>P</i> = 0.014; aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38, <i>P</i> = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MINOCA patients have similar mortality rates as MIOCA patients. MINOCA patients were less likely than those with MIOCA to be discharged with guideline-recommended secondary prevention therapy; however, those with MINOCA who received secondary prevention survived longer. Females with MIOCA experienced higher mortality rates vs. males.</p>","PeriodicalId":11973,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/a1/oead033.PMC10114528.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in treatment and outcomes amongst myocardial infarction patients presenting with and without obstructive coronary arteries: a prospective multicentre study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Lawless, Yolande Appelman, John F Beltrame, Eliano P Navarese, Hanna Ratcovich, Chris Wilkinson, Vijay Kunadian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oead033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Women have an increased prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Whether sex differences exist in the outcomes of patients with MI and obstructive coronary arteries (MIOCA) vs. MINOCA remains unclear. We describe sex-based differences in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with MINOCA vs. MIOCA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A large-scale cohort study of patients with ST/non-ST elevation MI undergoing coronary angiography (01/2015-12/2019). Patient demographics, diagnosis, prescribed discharge medications, in-hospital complications, and follow-up data were prospectively collected. A total of 13 202 participants were included (males 68.2% and females 31.8%). 10.9% were diagnosed with MINOCA. Median follow-up was 4.62 years. Females (44.8%) were as commonly diagnosed with MINOCA as males (55.2%), unlike the male preponderance in MIOCA (male, 69.8%; female, 30.2%). Less secondary prevention medications were prescribed at discharge for MINOCA than MIOCA. There was no difference in mortality risk between MINOCA and MIOCA [in-hospital: adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-2.35, <i>P</i> = 0.350; long term: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.31, <i>P</i> = 0.813]. MINOCA patients had reduced mortality at long-term follow-up if prescribed secondary prevention medications (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.87, <i>P</i> = 0.004). Females diagnosed with MIOCA had greater odds of in-hospital and 1-year mortality than males (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.07, <i>P</i> = 0.014; aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38, <i>P</i> = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MINOCA patients have similar mortality rates as MIOCA patients. MINOCA patients were less likely than those with MIOCA to be discharged with guideline-recommended secondary prevention therapy; however, those with MINOCA who received secondary prevention survived longer. Females with MIOCA experienced higher mortality rates vs. males.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/a1/oead033.PMC10114528.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非阻塞性冠状动脉(MINOCA)心肌梗死(MI)的女性发病率较高。冠状动脉阻塞性心肌梗死(MIOCA)与冠状动脉非阻塞性心肌梗死(MINOCA)患者的预后是否存在性别差异仍不清楚。我们描述了MINOCA与MIOCA患者在诊断、治疗和临床预后方面的性别差异:对接受冠状动脉造影术的ST/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行大规模队列研究(01/2015-12/2019)。前瞻性地收集了患者的人口统计学特征、诊断、出院处方药、院内并发症和随访数据。共纳入 13 202 名参与者(男性占 68.2%,女性占 31.8%)。10.9%的患者被确诊为 MINOCA。中位随访时间为 4.62 年。女性(44.8%)与男性(55.2%)一样常被诊断为 MINOCA,这与 MIOCA 中男性居多(男性 69.8%;女性 30.2%)的情况不同。与 MIOCA 相比,MINOCA 在出院时开出的二级预防药物更少。MINOCA 和 MIOCA 的死亡风险没有差异[院内:调整后的几率比(OR)1.32,95% 置信区间(CI)0.74-2.35,P = 0.350;长期:调整后的危险比(HR)1.03,95% CI 0.81-1.31,P = 0.813]。MINOCA患者如果服用二级预防药物,长期随访时死亡率会降低(aHR 0.64,95% CI 0.47-0.87,P = 0.004)。确诊为MIOCA的女性患者的院内死亡率和1年死亡率高于男性(aOR 1.50,95% CI 1.09-2.07,P = 0.014;aHR 1.18,95% CI 1.01-1.38,P = 0.048):结论:MINOCA 患者的死亡率与 MIOCA 患者相似。MINOCA患者在出院时接受指南推荐的二级预防治疗的可能性低于MIOCA患者;但是,接受二级预防治疗的MINOCA患者存活时间更长。女性 MIOCA 患者的死亡率高于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex differences in treatment and outcomes amongst myocardial infarction patients presenting with and without obstructive coronary arteries: a prospective multicentre study.

Aims: Women have an increased prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Whether sex differences exist in the outcomes of patients with MI and obstructive coronary arteries (MIOCA) vs. MINOCA remains unclear. We describe sex-based differences in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with MINOCA vs. MIOCA.

Methods and results: A large-scale cohort study of patients with ST/non-ST elevation MI undergoing coronary angiography (01/2015-12/2019). Patient demographics, diagnosis, prescribed discharge medications, in-hospital complications, and follow-up data were prospectively collected. A total of 13 202 participants were included (males 68.2% and females 31.8%). 10.9% were diagnosed with MINOCA. Median follow-up was 4.62 years. Females (44.8%) were as commonly diagnosed with MINOCA as males (55.2%), unlike the male preponderance in MIOCA (male, 69.8%; female, 30.2%). Less secondary prevention medications were prescribed at discharge for MINOCA than MIOCA. There was no difference in mortality risk between MINOCA and MIOCA [in-hospital: adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-2.35, P = 0.350; long term: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.31, P = 0.813]. MINOCA patients had reduced mortality at long-term follow-up if prescribed secondary prevention medications (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.87, P = 0.004). Females diagnosed with MIOCA had greater odds of in-hospital and 1-year mortality than males (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.07, P = 0.014; aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38, P = 0.048).

Conclusion: MINOCA patients have similar mortality rates as MIOCA patients. MINOCA patients were less likely than those with MIOCA to be discharged with guideline-recommended secondary prevention therapy; however, those with MINOCA who received secondary prevention survived longer. Females with MIOCA experienced higher mortality rates vs. males.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes of intracardiac flow dynamics measured by HyperDoppler in patients with aortic stenosis Development of a Small Animal Model Replicating Core Characteristics of Takotsubo Syndrome in Humans Elastin turnover in Williams Beuren and 7q11.23 microduplication syndromes Myeloid-specific interleukin-6 response: from vascular effects to the potential for novel personalized medicines Myeloid cell derived Interleukin-6 induces vascular dysfunction and vascular and systemic inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1