比较不同干预措施提高高血压患者服药依从性:网络荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000001015
Wei Yuan, Yu Zhang, LiHua Ma
{"title":"比较不同干预措施提高高血压患者服药依从性:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Wei Yuan, Yu Zhang, LiHua Ma","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension has become a major public problem. One of every 4 adults has hypertension. Medications are critical in controlling blood pressure, but patient medication adherence is low. Therefore, it is very crucial to promote medication adherence. However, the complexity and variety of interventions cause clinical decision-making difficulties for health managers and patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different interventions to improve medication adherence in patients with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, Wan Fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine disc databases for eligible studies. Medication adherence rate and medication adherence difference were assessed as outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and inconsistency detection were performed to evaluate whether the exclusion of high-risk studies affected the validity. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias table in Review Manager 5.4. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used to estimate the rankings among different interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials were included, and the interventions involved were categorized into 8 different categories. The network meta-analysis showed that the health intervention was the best to promote medication compliance in patients with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health intervention is recommended to improve medication adherence in patients with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Health managers are recommended to provide health intervention to patients with hypertension to improve their medication adherence. This approach reduces morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs for patients with cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"E9-E23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Different Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Patients with Hypertension: A Network Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Yuan, Yu Zhang, LiHua Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension has become a major public problem. One of every 4 adults has hypertension. Medications are critical in controlling blood pressure, but patient medication adherence is low. Therefore, it is very crucial to promote medication adherence. However, the complexity and variety of interventions cause clinical decision-making difficulties for health managers and patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different interventions to improve medication adherence in patients with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, Wan Fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine disc databases for eligible studies. Medication adherence rate and medication adherence difference were assessed as outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and inconsistency detection were performed to evaluate whether the exclusion of high-risk studies affected the validity. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias table in Review Manager 5.4. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used to estimate the rankings among different interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials were included, and the interventions involved were categorized into 8 different categories. The network meta-analysis showed that the health intervention was the best to promote medication compliance in patients with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health intervention is recommended to improve medication adherence in patients with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Health managers are recommended to provide health intervention to patients with hypertension to improve their medication adherence. This approach reduces morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs for patients with cardiovascular disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E9-E23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高血压已成为一个重大的公共问题。每四个成年人中就有一个患有高血压。药物对控制血压至关重要,但患者的药物依从性很低。因此,促进药物依从性是非常重要的。然而,干预措施的复杂性和多样性给卫生管理人员和患者带来了临床决策困难。目的:本研究的目的是比较不同干预措施提高高血压患者药物依从性的有效性。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、EMBASE、万方、中国国家知识基础设施、中国科技期刊数据库和中国生物医学光盘数据库,寻找符合条件的研究。评估药物依从率和药物依从性差异作为结局。通过敏感性分析和不一致检测来评价排除高危研究是否影响效度。使用Review Manager 5.4中的偏倚风险表评估偏倚风险。利用累积排名曲线下的曲面估计不同干预措施之间的排名。结果:纳入27项随机对照试验,干预措施分为8类。网络荟萃分析显示,健康干预对促进高血压患者服药依从性效果最好。结论:建议采取健康干预措施改善高血压患者的药物依从性。临床意义:建议健康管理人员为高血压患者提供健康干预,以提高他们的药物依从性。这种方法降低了心血管疾病患者的发病率、死亡率和医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Different Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence in Patients with Hypertension: A Network Meta-analysis.

Background: Hypertension has become a major public problem. One of every 4 adults has hypertension. Medications are critical in controlling blood pressure, but patient medication adherence is low. Therefore, it is very crucial to promote medication adherence. However, the complexity and variety of interventions cause clinical decision-making difficulties for health managers and patients.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different interventions to improve medication adherence in patients with hypertension.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, Wan Fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine disc databases for eligible studies. Medication adherence rate and medication adherence difference were assessed as outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and inconsistency detection were performed to evaluate whether the exclusion of high-risk studies affected the validity. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias table in Review Manager 5.4. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used to estimate the rankings among different interventions.

Results: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials were included, and the interventions involved were categorized into 8 different categories. The network meta-analysis showed that the health intervention was the best to promote medication compliance in patients with hypertension.

Conclusions: Health intervention is recommended to improve medication adherence in patients with hypertension.

Clinical implications: Health managers are recommended to provide health intervention to patients with hypertension to improve their medication adherence. This approach reduces morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs for patients with cardiovascular disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Hand Reflexology Massage on Pain and Anxiety After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Cardiovascular Health Behavior Prediction Model in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Sensitivity and Specificity of Pulse Oximetry for Identification of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review. Dignity, Resilience, and Quality of Life in Patients With Cardiac Disease: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Diet Quality Mediates the Relationship Between Chronic Stress and Inflammation in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1