使用Beers标准评估老年门诊患者用药质量:来自单中心回顾性研究的结果。

IF 2.8 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.4235/agmr.23.0036
Kittipak Jenghua, Kanchira Wutthi, Chanisorn Wannakrachang, Sitanan Chathongyos, Panadda Ngamsom
{"title":"使用Beers标准评估老年门诊患者用药质量:来自单中心回顾性研究的结果。","authors":"Kittipak Jenghua,&nbsp;Kanchira Wutthi,&nbsp;Chanisorn Wannakrachang,&nbsp;Sitanan Chathongyos,&nbsp;Panadda Ngamsom","doi":"10.4235/agmr.23.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No comprehensive assessment of the quality of medications used in older outpatients has been conducted in Thailand. This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of and factors contributing to older outpatients&apos; use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study retrospectively assessed the prescriptions of older (≥60 years) outpatients at a secondary-care hospital. For PIM identification, the 2019 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers criteria were applied, considering all five PIM categories: PIM category I (medications that are potentially inappropriate in most older adults), II (disease-/syndrome-exacerbating drugs), III (medications that should be used with caution), IV (clinically important drug-drug interactions), and V (medications that should be avoided or have their dosage reduced based on renal function).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 22,099 patients (mean age, 68.86±7.64 years). Nearly three-fourths of patients were prescribed PIMs, with 68.90%, 7.68%, 44.23%, 15.66%, and 3.05%, respectively, receiving category I-V medications. The positive factors associated with PIM use included female sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.16), age ≥75 years (OR=1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21), polypharmacy (OR=10.21; 95% CI, 9.31-11.21), ≥3 diagnostic categories (OR=2.31; 95% CI, 2.14-2.50), and ≥3 chronic morbidities (OR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.26-1.68). The negative factor associated with PIM use was a comorbidity score of ≥1 (OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIM use among older outpatients remains highly prevalent in clinical practice. The results of this study identified polypharmacy as the strongest factor affecting PIM use.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":"27 2","pages":"116-125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/91/agmr-23-0036.PMC10326409.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Medication Use Quality in Older Outpatients Using the Beers Criteria: Findings from a Single-Center Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kittipak Jenghua,&nbsp;Kanchira Wutthi,&nbsp;Chanisorn Wannakrachang,&nbsp;Sitanan Chathongyos,&nbsp;Panadda Ngamsom\",\"doi\":\"10.4235/agmr.23.0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No comprehensive assessment of the quality of medications used in older outpatients has been conducted in Thailand. This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of and factors contributing to older outpatients&apos; use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study retrospectively assessed the prescriptions of older (≥60 years) outpatients at a secondary-care hospital. For PIM identification, the 2019 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers criteria were applied, considering all five PIM categories: PIM category I (medications that are potentially inappropriate in most older adults), II (disease-/syndrome-exacerbating drugs), III (medications that should be used with caution), IV (clinically important drug-drug interactions), and V (medications that should be avoided or have their dosage reduced based on renal function).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 22,099 patients (mean age, 68.86±7.64 years). Nearly three-fourths of patients were prescribed PIMs, with 68.90%, 7.68%, 44.23%, 15.66%, and 3.05%, respectively, receiving category I-V medications. The positive factors associated with PIM use included female sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.16), age ≥75 years (OR=1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21), polypharmacy (OR=10.21; 95% CI, 9.31-11.21), ≥3 diagnostic categories (OR=2.31; 95% CI, 2.14-2.50), and ≥3 chronic morbidities (OR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.26-1.68). The negative factor associated with PIM use was a comorbidity score of ≥1 (OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIM use among older outpatients remains highly prevalent in clinical practice. The results of this study identified polypharmacy as the strongest factor affecting PIM use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"116-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/91/agmr-23-0036.PMC10326409.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.23.0036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.23.0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:泰国尚未对老年门诊患者使用的药物质量进行全面评估。本研究旨在了解老年门诊病人的患病率及影响因素;使用可能不适当的药物(PIMs)。方法:本横断面研究回顾性评估了一家二级医院老年(≥60岁)门诊患者的处方。对于PIM的识别,采用了2019年美国老年学会(AGS) Beers标准,考虑了PIM的所有五个类别:PIM类别I(对大多数老年人可能不合适的药物),II(疾病/综合征加重药物),III(应谨慎使用的药物),IV(临床上重要的药物-药物相互作用)和V(应避免或根据肾功能减少剂量的药物)。结果:纳入患者22,099例(平均年龄68.86±7.64岁)。近四分之三的患者使用pim,分别占68.90%、7.68%、44.23%、15.66%和3.05%的患者使用I-V类药物。与PIM使用相关的积极因素包括女性(优势比[OR]=1.08;95%可信区间[CI], 1.01-1.16),年龄≥75岁(OR=1.10;95% CI, 1.01-1.21),多药(OR=10.21;95% CI, 9.31-11.21),≥3个诊断类别(OR=2.31;95% CI, 2.14-2.50),且慢性发病率≥3例(OR=1.46;95% ci, 1.26-1.68)。与PIM使用相关的负面因素是合并症评分≥1 (OR=0.78;95% ci, 0.71-0.86)。结论:老年门诊患者PIM的使用在临床实践中仍然非常普遍。本研究的结果确定多药是影响PIM使用的最强因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Medication Use Quality in Older Outpatients Using the Beers Criteria: Findings from a Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Background: No comprehensive assessment of the quality of medications used in older outpatients has been conducted in Thailand. This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of and factors contributing to older outpatients' use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs).

Methods: This cross-sectional study retrospectively assessed the prescriptions of older (≥60 years) outpatients at a secondary-care hospital. For PIM identification, the 2019 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers criteria were applied, considering all five PIM categories: PIM category I (medications that are potentially inappropriate in most older adults), II (disease-/syndrome-exacerbating drugs), III (medications that should be used with caution), IV (clinically important drug-drug interactions), and V (medications that should be avoided or have their dosage reduced based on renal function).

Results: This study included 22,099 patients (mean age, 68.86±7.64 years). Nearly three-fourths of patients were prescribed PIMs, with 68.90%, 7.68%, 44.23%, 15.66%, and 3.05%, respectively, receiving category I-V medications. The positive factors associated with PIM use included female sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.16), age ≥75 years (OR=1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21), polypharmacy (OR=10.21; 95% CI, 9.31-11.21), ≥3 diagnostic categories (OR=2.31; 95% CI, 2.14-2.50), and ≥3 chronic morbidities (OR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.26-1.68). The negative factor associated with PIM use was a comorbidity score of ≥1 (OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86).

Conclusion: PIM use among older outpatients remains highly prevalent in clinical practice. The results of this study identified polypharmacy as the strongest factor affecting PIM use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impairment in activities of daily living and related factors in elderly patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis before hospitalization. Circulating BMP-7 Level is Independent of Sarcopenia in Older Asian Adults. Relationship between Muscle Mass and Muscle Strength with Bone Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Perioperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Delirium in Non-Dementia Older Patients after Non-Cardiac Surgery and Anesthesia: A Prospective Study. Preoperative Geriatric Characteristics Associated with Changes in Postoperative Cognitive Function and Quality of Life: a Prospective, Observational Analytic Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1