在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间,全国范围内放射肿瘤旅行和就医地点的变化。

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-22 DOI:10.3857/roj.2023.00164
Alexandra N De Leo, Fantine Giap, Matthew M Culbert, Nicolette Drescher, Ryan J Brisson, Vincent Cassidy, Etzer Michelet Augustin, Anthony Casper, David H Horowitz, Simon K Cheng, James B Yu
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间,全国范围内放射肿瘤旅行和就医地点的变化。","authors":"Alexandra N De Leo, Fantine Giap, Matthew M Culbert, Nicolette Drescher, Ryan J Brisson, Vincent Cassidy, Etzer Michelet Augustin, Anthony Casper, David H Horowitz, Simon K Cheng, James B Yu","doi":"10.3857/roj.2023.00164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable to coronavirus disease (COVID). Transportation barriers made travel to obtain medical care more difficult during the pandemic. Whether these factors led to changes in the distance traveled for radiotherapy and the coordinated location of radiation treatment is unknown.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed patients across 60 cancer sites in the National Cancer Database from 2018 to 2020. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed for changes in distance traveled for radiotherapy. We designated the facilities in the 99th percentile or above in terms of the proportion of patients who traveled more than 200 miles as \"destination facilities.\" We defined \"coordinated care\" as undergoing radiotherapy at the same facility where the cancer was diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 1,151,954 patients. There was a greater than 1% decrease in the proportion of patients treated in the Mid-Atlantic States. Mean distance traveled from place of residence to radiation treatment decreased from 28.6 to 25.9 miles, and the proportion traveling greater than 50 miles decreased from 7.7% to 7.1%. At \"destination facilities,\" the proportion traveling more than 200 miles decreased from 29.3% in 2018 to 24% in 2020. In comparison, at the other hospitals, the proportion traveling more than 200 miles decreased from 1.07% to 0.97%. In 2020, residing in a rural area resulted in a lower odds of having coordinated care (multivariable odds ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The first year of the COVID pandemic measurably impacted the location of U.S. radiation therapy treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/d7/roj-2023-00164.PMC10326508.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide changes in radiation oncology travel and location of care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra N De Leo, Fantine Giap, Matthew M Culbert, Nicolette Drescher, Ryan J Brisson, Vincent Cassidy, Etzer Michelet Augustin, Anthony Casper, David H Horowitz, Simon K Cheng, James B Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3857/roj.2023.00164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable to coronavirus disease (COVID). Transportation barriers made travel to obtain medical care more difficult during the pandemic. Whether these factors led to changes in the distance traveled for radiotherapy and the coordinated location of radiation treatment is unknown.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed patients across 60 cancer sites in the National Cancer Database from 2018 to 2020. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed for changes in distance traveled for radiotherapy. We designated the facilities in the 99th percentile or above in terms of the proportion of patients who traveled more than 200 miles as \\\"destination facilities.\\\" We defined \\\"coordinated care\\\" as undergoing radiotherapy at the same facility where the cancer was diagnosed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 1,151,954 patients. There was a greater than 1% decrease in the proportion of patients treated in the Mid-Atlantic States. Mean distance traveled from place of residence to radiation treatment decreased from 28.6 to 25.9 miles, and the proportion traveling greater than 50 miles decreased from 7.7% to 7.1%. At \\\"destination facilities,\\\" the proportion traveling more than 200 miles decreased from 29.3% in 2018 to 24% in 2020. In comparison, at the other hospitals, the proportion traveling more than 200 miles decreased from 1.07% to 0.97%. In 2020, residing in a rural area resulted in a lower odds of having coordinated care (multivariable odds ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The first year of the COVID pandemic measurably impacted the location of U.S. radiation therapy treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/d7/roj-2023-00164.PMC10326508.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2023.00164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2023.00164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癌症患者特别容易感染冠状病毒疾病(COVID)。在大流行期间,交通障碍使患者前往就医更加困难。这些因素是否会导致放射治疗的旅行距离和放射治疗的协调地点发生变化尚不得而知:我们分析了 2018 年至 2020 年全国癌症数据库中 60 个癌症站点的患者。对人口统计学和临床变量进行了分析,以了解放疗距离的变化。我们将行程超过 200 英里的患者比例排名第 99 位或以上的机构指定为 "目的地机构"。我们将 "协调治疗 "定义为在诊断癌症的同一机构接受放疗:我们对 1,151,954 名患者进行了评估。在大西洋中部各州接受治疗的患者比例下降了1%以上。从居住地到放射治疗地点的平均距离从 28.6 英里降至 25.9 英里,行程超过 50 英里的比例从 7.7% 降至 7.1%。在 "目的地设施",行程超过 200 英里的比例从 2018 年的 29.3% 降至 2020 年的 24%。相比之下,在其他医院,行程超过 200 英里的比例从 1.07% 降至 0.97%。2020年,居住在农村地区的患者接受协调护理的几率较低(多变量几率比=0.89;95%置信区间,0.83-0.95):结论:COVID大流行的第一年对美国放射治疗的地点产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nationwide changes in radiation oncology travel and location of care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Purpose: Patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable to coronavirus disease (COVID). Transportation barriers made travel to obtain medical care more difficult during the pandemic. Whether these factors led to changes in the distance traveled for radiotherapy and the coordinated location of radiation treatment is unknown.

Materials and methods: We analyzed patients across 60 cancer sites in the National Cancer Database from 2018 to 2020. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed for changes in distance traveled for radiotherapy. We designated the facilities in the 99th percentile or above in terms of the proportion of patients who traveled more than 200 miles as "destination facilities." We defined "coordinated care" as undergoing radiotherapy at the same facility where the cancer was diagnosed.

Results: We evaluated 1,151,954 patients. There was a greater than 1% decrease in the proportion of patients treated in the Mid-Atlantic States. Mean distance traveled from place of residence to radiation treatment decreased from 28.6 to 25.9 miles, and the proportion traveling greater than 50 miles decreased from 7.7% to 7.1%. At "destination facilities," the proportion traveling more than 200 miles decreased from 29.3% in 2018 to 24% in 2020. In comparison, at the other hospitals, the proportion traveling more than 200 miles decreased from 1.07% to 0.97%. In 2020, residing in a rural area resulted in a lower odds of having coordinated care (multivariable odds ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95).

Conclusion: The first year of the COVID pandemic measurably impacted the location of U.S. radiation therapy treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Implementing high-dose rate surface mould brachytherapy for carcinoma of eyelid: a practical approach and weekly review The effects of high-dose radiation therapy on bone: a scoping review Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation Long-term toxicities after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with or without total body irradiation: a population-based study in Korea Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1