安然度过危机:在经济危机期间,客户与公司的关系会有回报吗?

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1
Forrest V Morgeson, Udit Sharma, Xiaoxu Wu Schultz, Anita Pansari, Ayalla Ruvio, G Tomas M Hult
{"title":"安然度过危机:在经济危机期间,客户与公司的关系会有回报吗?","authors":"Forrest V Morgeson,&nbsp;Udit Sharma,&nbsp;Xiaoxu Wu Schultz,&nbsp;Anita Pansari,&nbsp;Ayalla Ruvio,&nbsp;G Tomas M Hult","doi":"10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Do stronger relationships with customers (customer-company relationships [CCR]) help firms better weather economic crises? To answer this question, we examine firm performance during the stock market crashes associated with the two most severe economic crises of the last 15 years-the protracted Great Recession crisis (2008-2009) and the shorter but extreme COVID-19 pandemic crisis (2020). Juxtaposing the predominant expected utility theory perspective with observed deviations in investor behavior during crises, we find that both pre-crash firm-level customer satisfaction and customer loyalty are positively associated with abnormal stock returns and lower idiosyncratic risk during a market crash, while pre-crash firm-level customer complaint rate negatively affects abnormal stock returns and increases idiosyncratic risk. On average, we find that one standard deviation higher CCR is associated with between $0.9 billion and $2.4 billion in market capitalization on an annualized basis. Importantly, we find that these effects are weaker for firms with higher market share during the COVID-19 crash, but not during the Great Recession crash. These results are found to be robust to a variety of alternate model specifications, time periods, sub-samples, accounting for firm strategies during the crises, and endogeneity corrections. When compared to relevant non-crash periods, we also find that such effects are equally strong during the Great Recession crash and even stronger during the COVID-19 pandemic crash. Contributing to both the marketing-finance interface literature and the nascent literature on marketing during economic crises, implications from these findings are provided for researchers, marketing theory, and managers.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weathering the crash: Do customer-company relationships pay off during economic crises?\",\"authors\":\"Forrest V Morgeson,&nbsp;Udit Sharma,&nbsp;Xiaoxu Wu Schultz,&nbsp;Anita Pansari,&nbsp;Ayalla Ruvio,&nbsp;G Tomas M Hult\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Do stronger relationships with customers (customer-company relationships [CCR]) help firms better weather economic crises? To answer this question, we examine firm performance during the stock market crashes associated with the two most severe economic crises of the last 15 years-the protracted Great Recession crisis (2008-2009) and the shorter but extreme COVID-19 pandemic crisis (2020). Juxtaposing the predominant expected utility theory perspective with observed deviations in investor behavior during crises, we find that both pre-crash firm-level customer satisfaction and customer loyalty are positively associated with abnormal stock returns and lower idiosyncratic risk during a market crash, while pre-crash firm-level customer complaint rate negatively affects abnormal stock returns and increases idiosyncratic risk. On average, we find that one standard deviation higher CCR is associated with between $0.9 billion and $2.4 billion in market capitalization on an annualized basis. Importantly, we find that these effects are weaker for firms with higher market share during the COVID-19 crash, but not during the Great Recession crash. These results are found to be robust to a variety of alternate model specifications, time periods, sub-samples, accounting for firm strategies during the crises, and endogeneity corrections. When compared to relevant non-crash periods, we also find that such effects are equally strong during the Great Recession crash and even stronger during the COVID-19 pandemic crash. Contributing to both the marketing-finance interface literature and the nascent literature on marketing during economic crises, implications from these findings are provided for researchers, marketing theory, and managers.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加强与客户的关系(客户-公司关系[CCR])是否有助于公司更好地应对经济危机?为了回答这个问题,我们研究了与过去15年中两次最严重的经济危机——旷日持久的大衰退危机(2008-2009年)和短暂但极端的新冠肺炎大流行危机(2020年)——相关的股市崩盘期间的公司表现。将主要的预期效用理论视角与危机期间观察到的投资者行为偏差相结合,我们发现,危机前公司层面的客户满意度和客户忠诚度都与市场崩溃期间的异常股票回报和较低的特殊风险呈正相关,而崩溃前公司层面的客户投诉率对异常股票回报产生负面影响,并增加了特殊风险。平均而言,我们发现CCR高出一个标准差,年化市值在9亿至24亿美元之间。重要的是,我们发现,在新冠肺炎危机期间,这些影响对市场份额较高的公司较弱,但在大衰退危机期间则不然。研究发现,这些结果对各种替代模型规范、时间段、子样本、危机期间企业战略的核算以及内生性修正都是稳健的。与相关的非突发时期相比,我们还发现,在大衰退崩溃期间,这种影响同样强烈,在新冠肺炎大流行崩溃期间,甚至更强烈。这些发现为研究人员、营销理论和管理者提供了启示,有助于市场营销-财务界面文献和经济危机期间市场营销的新兴文献。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weathering the crash: Do customer-company relationships pay off during economic crises?

Do stronger relationships with customers (customer-company relationships [CCR]) help firms better weather economic crises? To answer this question, we examine firm performance during the stock market crashes associated with the two most severe economic crises of the last 15 years-the protracted Great Recession crisis (2008-2009) and the shorter but extreme COVID-19 pandemic crisis (2020). Juxtaposing the predominant expected utility theory perspective with observed deviations in investor behavior during crises, we find that both pre-crash firm-level customer satisfaction and customer loyalty are positively associated with abnormal stock returns and lower idiosyncratic risk during a market crash, while pre-crash firm-level customer complaint rate negatively affects abnormal stock returns and increases idiosyncratic risk. On average, we find that one standard deviation higher CCR is associated with between $0.9 billion and $2.4 billion in market capitalization on an annualized basis. Importantly, we find that these effects are weaker for firms with higher market share during the COVID-19 crash, but not during the Great Recession crash. These results are found to be robust to a variety of alternate model specifications, time periods, sub-samples, accounting for firm strategies during the crises, and endogeneity corrections. When compared to relevant non-crash periods, we also find that such effects are equally strong during the Great Recession crash and even stronger during the COVID-19 pandemic crash. Contributing to both the marketing-finance interface literature and the nascent literature on marketing during economic crises, implications from these findings are provided for researchers, marketing theory, and managers.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-023-00947-1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
期刊最新文献
There is business like show business! What marketing scholars and managers can learn from 40 years of entertainment science research Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses Crossing incentive alignment and adaptive designs in choice-based conjoint: A fruitful endeavor Silently killing your panelists one email at a time: The true cost of email solicitations Engaging customers and suppliers for environmental sustainability: Investigating the drivers and the effects on firm performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1