帕金森病患者体位平衡的定量分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Parkinson's Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/9688025
Do Young Kwon, Yuri Kwon, Ji-An Choi, Junghyuk Ko, Ji-Won Kim
{"title":"帕金森病患者体位平衡的定量分析。","authors":"Do Young Kwon,&nbsp;Yuri Kwon,&nbsp;Ji-An Choi,&nbsp;Junghyuk Ko,&nbsp;Ji-Won Kim","doi":"10.1155/2023/9688025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postural instability has been identified as a fall risk factor with a significant impact on the quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to compare the center of pressure (COP) between faller and nonfaller patients with PD during static standing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two faller patients and 32 nonfaller patients with PD participated in this study. All patients performed the static balance test on a force plate. COP data were recorded during quiet standing. Mean distance, sway area, mean velocity, mean frequency, and peak power were derived from the COP data. Statistical analysis was performed using independent <i>t</i>-tests to compare faller and nonfaller patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fallers presented a greater average distance, wider sway area, faster average speed, and greater peak power than nonfallers (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In contrast, no significant group differences were observed in peak frequency and mean frequency (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although falls occur during dynamic activities, our study demonstrated that even a safe and simple static postural balance test could significantly differentiate between faller and nonfaller patients. Thus, these results suggest that quantitatively assessed static postural sway variables would be useful for distinguishing prospective fallers among PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19907,"journal":{"name":"Parkinson's Disease","volume":"2023 ","pages":"9688025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Analysis of Postural Balance in Faller and Nonfaller Patients with Parkinson's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Do Young Kwon,&nbsp;Yuri Kwon,&nbsp;Ji-An Choi,&nbsp;Junghyuk Ko,&nbsp;Ji-Won Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/9688025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postural instability has been identified as a fall risk factor with a significant impact on the quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to compare the center of pressure (COP) between faller and nonfaller patients with PD during static standing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two faller patients and 32 nonfaller patients with PD participated in this study. All patients performed the static balance test on a force plate. COP data were recorded during quiet standing. Mean distance, sway area, mean velocity, mean frequency, and peak power were derived from the COP data. Statistical analysis was performed using independent <i>t</i>-tests to compare faller and nonfaller patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fallers presented a greater average distance, wider sway area, faster average speed, and greater peak power than nonfallers (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In contrast, no significant group differences were observed in peak frequency and mean frequency (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although falls occur during dynamic activities, our study demonstrated that even a safe and simple static postural balance test could significantly differentiate between faller and nonfaller patients. Thus, these results suggest that quantitatively assessed static postural sway variables would be useful for distinguishing prospective fallers among PD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"9688025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10299878/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9688025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9688025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体位不稳定已被确定为一个跌倒危险因素,对帕金森病(PD)患者的生活质量有重大影响。本研究的目的是比较跌倒和非跌倒PD患者在静止站立时的压力中心(COP)。方法:32例跌倒性PD患者和32例非跌倒性PD患者参与本研究。所有患者均在力板上进行静平衡测试。在安静站立时记录COP数据。平均距离、摆动面积、平均速度、平均频率和峰值功率均来自COP数据。采用独立t检验进行统计学分析,比较跌倒患者和非跌倒患者。结果:摔倒者比未摔倒者平均距离大、摆动面积宽、平均速度快、峰值功率大(p p > 0.05)。结论:虽然跌倒发生在动态活动中,但我们的研究表明,即使是安全简单的静态姿势平衡测试也可以显著区分跌倒患者和非跌倒患者。因此,这些结果表明,定量评估静态姿势摇摆变量将有助于区分PD患者的潜在跌倒者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantitative Analysis of Postural Balance in Faller and Nonfaller Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Postural instability has been identified as a fall risk factor with a significant impact on the quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to compare the center of pressure (COP) between faller and nonfaller patients with PD during static standing.

Methods: Thirty-two faller patients and 32 nonfaller patients with PD participated in this study. All patients performed the static balance test on a force plate. COP data were recorded during quiet standing. Mean distance, sway area, mean velocity, mean frequency, and peak power were derived from the COP data. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-tests to compare faller and nonfaller patients.

Results: Fallers presented a greater average distance, wider sway area, faster average speed, and greater peak power than nonfallers (p < 0.05). In contrast, no significant group differences were observed in peak frequency and mean frequency (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Although falls occur during dynamic activities, our study demonstrated that even a safe and simple static postural balance test could significantly differentiate between faller and nonfaller patients. Thus, these results suggest that quantitatively assessed static postural sway variables would be useful for distinguishing prospective fallers among PD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Parkinson’s Disease is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, genetics, cellular, molecular and neurophysiology, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and Feasibility of Nonpharmacological Interventions for People With Parkinson's Disease and Cognitive Impairment on Patient-Centred Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale. A Cognitive-Behavioral Model of Apathy in Parkinson's Disease. Possible Implications of Managing Alexithymia on Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. Implications of Convolutional Neural Network for Brain MRI Image Classification to Identify Alzheimer's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1