了解生物荧光颗粒计数与菌落形成单位的非等效性。

Joanny Salvas, Petra Merker, Mike Dingle, Cedric Joossen, Chris Knutsen, David Govezensky, Jim Cannon, Philip Villari, Anthony Cundell, Victoria Navarro, Margit Franz-Riethdorf, Allison Scott
{"title":"了解生物荧光颗粒计数与菌落形成单位的非等效性。","authors":"Joanny Salvas, Petra Merker, Mike Dingle, Cedric Joossen, Chris Knutsen, David Govezensky, Jim Cannon, Philip Villari, Anthony Cundell, Victoria Navarro, Margit Franz-Riethdorf, Allison Scott","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adopting emerging microbiological methods is often desirable because it enables more advantageous, real-time monitoring practices. However, when the newer method measures contamination based on a different detection principle and provides results that are based on different units of measure, a paradigm shift is necessary. That shift can be one of the most difficult challenges in any such project and requires careful consideration. In this article, we explore the challenges presented by the bio-fluorescent particle counting (BFPC) technology, when considering that the traditional colony-forming unit (CFU) is the gold standard that any change is measured against. We examine why attempts to correlate newer units of measure used by biofluorescent particle counters, namely the auto-fluorescent units (AFUs), to the traditional CFUs are not necessarily appropriate. The article explores in depth why there is no consistent correlation factor between the two units of measure, and why that should not be a barrier to fully leveraging, implementing, and using such modern technologies in routine monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"514-518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Non-Equivalency of Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counts versus the Colony-Forming Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Joanny Salvas, Petra Merker, Mike Dingle, Cedric Joossen, Chris Knutsen, David Govezensky, Jim Cannon, Philip Villari, Anthony Cundell, Victoria Navarro, Margit Franz-Riethdorf, Allison Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adopting emerging microbiological methods is often desirable because it enables more advantageous, real-time monitoring practices. However, when the newer method measures contamination based on a different detection principle and provides results that are based on different units of measure, a paradigm shift is necessary. That shift can be one of the most difficult challenges in any such project and requires careful consideration. In this article, we explore the challenges presented by the bio-fluorescent particle counting (BFPC) technology, when considering that the traditional colony-forming unit (CFU) is the gold standard that any change is measured against. We examine why attempts to correlate newer units of measure used by biofluorescent particle counters, namely the auto-fluorescent units (AFUs), to the traditional CFUs are not necessarily appropriate. The article explores in depth why there is no consistent correlation factor between the two units of measure, and why that should not be a barrier to fully leveraging, implementing, and using such modern technologies in routine monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"514-518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用新出现的微生物学方法往往是可取的,因为它可以实现更有利的实时监测实践。然而,当新方法根据不同的检测原理来测量污染,并提供基于不同计量单位的结果时,就有必要进行范式转换。这种转变可能是任何此类项目中最困难的挑战之一,需要慎重考虑。考虑到传统的菌落形成单位(CFU)是衡量任何变化的黄金标准,本文将探讨生物荧光颗粒计数(BFPC)技术所带来的挑战。我们探讨了为什么试图将生物荧光颗粒计数器使用的新计量单位(即自动荧光单位 (AFU))与传统的菌落形成单位(CFU)联系起来并不一定合适。文章深入探讨了为什么这两种测量单位之间没有一致的相关系数,以及为什么这不应该成为在常规监测中充分利用、实施和使用此类现代技术的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the Non-Equivalency of Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counts versus the Colony-Forming Unit.

Adopting emerging microbiological methods is often desirable because it enables more advantageous, real-time monitoring practices. However, when the newer method measures contamination based on a different detection principle and provides results that are based on different units of measure, a paradigm shift is necessary. That shift can be one of the most difficult challenges in any such project and requires careful consideration. In this article, we explore the challenges presented by the bio-fluorescent particle counting (BFPC) technology, when considering that the traditional colony-forming unit (CFU) is the gold standard that any change is measured against. We examine why attempts to correlate newer units of measure used by biofluorescent particle counters, namely the auto-fluorescent units (AFUs), to the traditional CFUs are not necessarily appropriate. The article explores in depth why there is no consistent correlation factor between the two units of measure, and why that should not be a barrier to fully leveraging, implementing, and using such modern technologies in routine monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation. Definition of particle visibility threshold in parenteral drug products - towards standardization of visual inspection operator qualification. Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification. Comparing Container Closure Integrity Test Methods-Performance of Headspace Carbon Dioxide Analysis versus Helium Leakage Using Positive Controls. Case Studies on Changes and Proposed Process Development Approaches Reflecting Applicability of PDA Technical Report No. 89: Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1